Not exact matches
«It
makes sense for all kids to reduce the amount of dye they take in,» says Arnold, who says that per
capita consumption of artificial food dyes has quadrupled in the last 50 years.
In a world where people are consuming increasingly more resources (including carbon) per
capita, it only seems logical that to
make significant improvements to the earth's natural environment we must address
consumption AND population.
You
made a huge claim that a 50 % reduction in population would lead to a 75 % reduction in
consumption per
capita.
It
makes little to no sense per
capita, of course, before we even get on to OPatrick's point about
consumption vs production emissions, and China would have a point bringing both of those up at negotiations - but ultimately, there's national policy to be
made.
NYC has some of the lowest per
capita energy
consumption in the US due to it's density which
makes it far more efficient.
The linkage between per
capita energy
consumption and per
capita water
consumption and climate is
made for some.
However, results from the model show that an unsustainable scenario can be
made sustainable by reducing per
capita depletion rates, reducing inequality to decrease excessive
consumption by the wealthiest, and reducing birth rates to stabilize the population [134].