The
new car safety rating is usually based on the new car safety devices or the improved car safety devices provided or incorporated in cars.
Car insurance companies also look
at car safety ratings when calculating and determining car insurance rates.
New car safety ratings are being done using crash testing vehicles in a controlled laboratory or facility as a reference.
Kalra also suspects that people will fear autonomous cars less when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration establishes a self -
driving car safety rating, like its crash test ratings for traditional cars.
A host of new tests were introduced for 2014's
car safety ratings designed to test Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems that detect a potential accident and apply the car's brakes in an attempt prevent it.
[125] The Used
Car Safety Ratings evaluation found that VT / VX Commodores provide a «better than average» level of occupant protection in the event of an accident, with VY / VZ models uprated to «significantly better than average».
In Australia, the 1990 to 1995 Nissan 300ZX was assessed in the Used
Car Safety Ratings brochure as providing «average» protection for its occupants in the event of a crash.
If you want to know what safety features to look for in your first car, go to: Australian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) and Used
Car Safety Rating Program (UCSRP).
[27] The 2010 edition of Monash University's
Used Car Safety Ratings, found that the Golf Mk5 provides an «excellent» (five out of five stars) level of occupant safety protection in the event of an accident.
In Australia, the 1995 to 2000 Ford Mondeos were assessed in the Used
Car Safety Ratings 2006 as providing «significantly better than average» protection for their occupants in the event of a crash.
In Australia, 1984 — 2005 Civics were assessed in the Used
Car Safety Ratings 2006 on their level of occupant protection regardless of size or era.
[87] Holden's strong focus on safety can be seen in the Used
Car Safety Ratings.
[69] The Used
Car Safety Ratings, published in 2008 by the Monash University Accident Research Centre, found that first generation Commodores (VB — VL) provide a «worse than average» level of occupant safety protection in the event of an accident.
In Australia, the 1997 — 2003 Daewoo Lanos was assessed in the Used
Car Safety Ratings 2006 as providing «worse than average» protection for its occupants in the event of a crash.
[86][87] The Used
Car Safety Ratings, published in 2008 by the Monash University Accident Research Centre, found that V20 Camry models provide an «average» (3/5 stars) level of occupant safety protection in the event of an accident.
In Australia, the 1988 — 1991 CR - X was assessed in the Used
Car Safety Ratings 2006 as providing «significantly worse than average» protection for its occupants in the event of side impact.
On the other hand, the used
car safety ratings are based from collated information from police reports with regards to actual car crashes.
New
car safety ratings as well as used car safety ratings are established in most countries.
Used
car safety ratings or UCSR can be referred to by potential used car buyers to select a safe vehicle and not a worn - out car which could risk life.
If you are wondering whether used cars are safe or not, then find out how each car performs in the Used
Car Safety Ratings (UCSR).
Global vehicle pricing authority Redbook has incorporated the Used
Car Safety Ratings (UCSR) ratings into its vehicle data, to provide a more detailed safety report of older, second - hand vehicles.
If it is
car safety ratings that's paramount, then you might want to consider the results of the annual Top Safety Pick awards, released by the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety (IIHS).
Car safety ratings have been known to have a huge effect on your insurance rates.