That, to some degree, is a more immediate question to a lot of them than
the carbon budget problem.
Not exact matches
An important shift this time around is from considering emissions pathways to viewing
carbon use as a
budget problem.
But the underlying
problem is that so little of the global
carbon budget remains.
This is a serious
problem in itself, but a more fundamental
problem with the emission
budget concept seems to be more - or-less unexplored: Do cumulative
carbon emission
budgets have a sound scientific foundation?
The main
problem is staying below the
carbon budget necessary for a livable world, along with economic development and equity.
LONDON, 4 March, 2017 — Climate scientists, struggling with the enduring
problem of the
carbon budget, may have to think again as a result of new research findings.
As
carbon prices in Europe collapse, Joan MacNaughton explains how governments can tackle climate change and their
budget problems by helping out the market
The real
problem is that the remaining
carbon budgets are so small, and the time so short, and the fossil - cartel so powerful, and the need for low -
carbon investment so pressing, that market / technology dynamics will not alone drive the necessary progress, at anything like the necessary speed.
«The
problem of fairly distributing the global mitigation effort is particularly important for the 1.5 °C temperature limitation objective, due to its rapidly depleting global
carbon budget.
So you not only have to * first * convince those who think there is no
problem, which comprise a significant amount of people in this country, but * second * even among those who agree about the nature of the
problem (or about the limits of temperature variance, concentrations of CO2, the total
carbon budget, etc.), there is no will to implement a singular solution that will cause significant adjustment in their mentality.
the
problem lies in the IPCC
carbon budget.