Tampa, Florida - based Seminole Electric Cooperative recently announced plans asking for proposals for
carbon capture technology for its proposed 750 megawatt «clean coal» power plant.
Not exact matches
The coal industry was interested in ensuring that the Paris deal provides a role
for low - emission coal - fired power plants and financial support
for carbon capture and storage
technology, the officials said.
«Energy efficiency, bioenergy and
carbon capture and storage (CCS) are notable examples of where significant potential
for technology progress remains, but strong policy signals will be required to trigger the appropriate investments.»
It's essential to extend and expand tax incentives
for carbon capture, update state laws to include CCUS
technology in clean energy standards, and fund continued
carbon capture RD&D, among other things, if we are going to reach our emissions - cutting goals.
The conclusions are based on a model accounting
for fuel prices, GHG allowances and the payback period of
technologies such as combined heat and power and
carbon capture and storage.
Research published in the International Journal of Decision Support Systems investigates the pros and cons, assesses the risks associated with
carbon capture and provides a new framework
for assessing the necessary
technology.
Adoption of clean coal
technologies like
carbon capture and storage also will be a heavy lift
for the utility sector, since they can significantly drive up production costs.
Emitting CO2 would need to cost at least $ 30 per metric ton via a
carbon tax or a cap and trade market
for any of the various
carbon capture and sequestration
technologies to be economically competitive, according to the report.
Dubbed
carbon capture and storage (or
carbon sequestration), such
technology will be fully demonstrated
for the first time near Mattoon in southeastern Illinois, the FutureGen Alliance (a public — private partnership to build a prototype clean - coal plant) announced.
The DOE says that it will request $ 241 million
for fiscal year 2009 to demonstrate
technologies for cost - effective
carbon capture and storage
for coal - fired power plants — including $ 156 million
for the restructured FutureGen approach (aimed at commercializing the
technology by 2015) and $ 85 million
for the agency's Clean Coal Power Initiative.
Yohe estimates the cost of achieving a more modest goal of holding warming to roughly 2 degrees C at a cost of 0.5 to 1.5 percent of gross domestic product
for the U.S. by 2050, thanks to the expense incurred by,
for example, replacing existing coal - fired power plants with renewables or retrofitting them with
carbon -
capture technology.
The President's initiative will empower young men and women to invent and commercialize advanced energy
technologies such as efficient and cost effective methods
for converting sunlight to electricity and fuel,
carbon capture and sequestration, stationary and portable advanced batteries
for plug - in electric cars, advanced energy storage concepts that will enable sustained energy supply from solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources, high - efficiency deployment of power across «smart grids,» and
carbon neutral commercial and residential buildings.
Chu highlighted the department's biggest new research initiative, a set of eight new Energy Innovation Hubs, each one focused on a different energy - related challenge: solar electricity; fuels produced directly from sunlight; batteries and other kinds of energy storage;
carbon capture and storage; new
technologies for the electrical grid; efficient buildings; extreme materials; and modeling and simulation.
Priority areas of focus
for this Initiative may include: energy efficiency, smart grid, second - generation biofuels, and clean coal
technologies including
carbon capture and storage; solar energy and energy efficient building and advanced battery
technologies; and sustainable transportation, wind energy, and micro-hydro power.
While
carbon capture technology is common, it can be expensive and, in most cases, requires extreme and precise conditions
for the process to be successful.
Your otherwise informative «Instant expert» article about new
technologies for carbon capture (2 April) missed some important numbers.
For instance, how...
Governments that have signed Kyoto have until 2008 to decide whether the CDM should include
technologies that
capture carbon emissions,
for instance from a coal - fired power plant, and then bury them below ground.
Girding myself
for potentially indecipherable jokes, I'm here to see Lackner's potentially world - saving
technology: a plastic resin that can
capture carbon dioxide directly from the air.
«We
capture impurities» While Huaneng is leading the way in
capturing carbon for coal - fired power plants, an industry that is traditionally tied with CCUS, the Chinese coal giant Shenhua is trying to adopt CCUS
technology in a new sector: factories that produce chemicals out of coal.
If, as Perry has claimed, climate change is a baseless hoax, it makes no sense that he should advocate
for a
technology explicitly designed to
capture and sequester
carbon emissions from coal - fired power plants
for the sole purpose of averting the warming effect of those emissions.
«Lacking economic incentive is the biggest hurdle
for the development of
carbon capture, utilization and storage
technology,» Sung said.
The DOE is asking Congress
for $ 407 million to research how to burn coal most efficiently, along with $ 241 million to demonstrate such
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technologies — at least $ 900 million less than DOE said it would have cost to complete FutureGen.
To do this, facilities would have to incorporate
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technology in their construction, a promising but relatively new method of
capturing CO2 and either storing it underground or using the gas
for industrial purposes.
The most promising of these options include renewable sources of a variety of types, advanced fossil - fuel
technologies that can
capture and sequester
carbon, and hydrogen - powered fuel cells
for vehicle propulsion and dispersed electricity generation.
From the International Energy Agency to the United Nations — sanctioned Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), such
carbon capture and storage (CCS), particularly
for coal - fired power plants, has been identified as a
technology critical to enabling deep, rapid cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.
The fate of what might prove to be the most important
technology for solving global warming —
carbon capture and storage — is floundering
The report shall assess a variety of
carbon reduction
technologies, including the application of various
carbon capture and sequestration
technologies for both new and existing power plants.
It shows that
for this «plan B» to be on the table, we will need vigorous development, deployment and acceptance of
technologies like sustainable biomass in conjunction with
carbon capture and storage,» says IIASA Deputy Director Nebojsa Nakicenovic, a co-author on the paper and a co-chair of the GCP scientific steering committee.
He said operational costs need to fall to about $ 100 per ton of
captured carbon for the
technology to be scalable.
Conventional
technologies for capturing xenon use activated charcoal, which is fine black
carbon powder processed to be porous, with an effective surface area of 500 square meters a gram.
The United States has many promising options
for obtaining new supplies of electricity and changing its supply mix during the next two to three decades, especially if
carbon capture and storage and evolutionary nuclear
technologies can be deployed at required scales.
For the past decade, governments and utilities have been looking at how
carbon capture technologies might be deployed to reduce emission of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, while enabling low -
carbon electricity generation.
RD&D on
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technology is needed, especially given our conclusion that the current atmospheric CO2 level is already in the dangerous zone, but continuing issues with CCS
technology [7], [244] make it inappropriate to construct fossil fuel power plants with a promise of future retrofit
for carbon capture.
This year's winners are the GLO Transparent Ceramic Scintillator, a
technology that provides much faster imaging of metal parts; the Polyelectrolyte Enabled Liftoff (PEEL)
technology, a method of fabricating freestanding polymer films; and
for a suite of computational tools that help businesses develop
carbon capture technology.
In particular, these models love a
technology called «bioenergy
carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS)» because it has negative emissions — you grow biomass, harvest it and burn it
for electricity, and then store the pollution underground.
But every billion - dollar
carbon -
capture project, in the meantime, is raiding money that might otherwise go into basic research and development aimed at advancing solar
technology or large - scale energy storage or other fields where breakthroughs could help lay the groundwork
for a post-fossil global energy system — instead of providing a dicey Band - Aid to keep societies stuck on the coal rung of the heat ladder a while longer.
The report also includes detailed timelines of when various
technologies for capturing, storing, and monitoring
carbon would be ready.
In 2005, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published a report on
carbon dioxide
capture and storage that was enthusiastic about the possibilities of such
technology, but downbeat on prospects
for adoption given the cost.
We will establish an international initiative with the support of the IEA to develop roadmaps
for innovative
technologies and cooperate upon existing and new partnerships, including
carbon capture and storage (CCS) and advanced energy
technologies.
Dr. Depledge described signs of a shift in the oil kingdom's stance, including its endorsement of science pointing to big impacts from a building human influence on climate and commitment of money to pursue
technologies for capturing carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels and other new energy options.
A
technology developed at a national lab
for improving
carbon capture at power plants may be able to help craft breweries
capture and reuse CO2 from their fermentation processes, while also slashing costs.
We have advocates assuring us that rapid introduction of renewables, or rapid introduction of nuclear, or rapid introduction of
carbon capture, are all we need to avoid catastrophe; no need
for sharp demand reductions independent of non-fossil
technology introduction.
• Leads global sector public financing towards cleaner energy by calling
for the end of U.S. government support
for public financing of new coal - fired powers plants overseas, except
for the most efficient coal
technology available in the world's poorest countries, or facilities deploying
carbon capture and sequestration
technologies; and
One implication
for technology R&D policy is that in a world of cheap gas there's probably a lot of value in looking
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technologies for use on gas - fired power plants.
While ensuring the widespread deployment of
carbon capture / storage
technology does represent a significant challenge, it is more feasible than other policy options being offered by those who simply don't see any role
for coal in our energy future.
He said this was particularly true
for technologies like systems
for capturing and storing
carbon dioxide from power plants.
Mindful of the important role of a range of alternative energy
technologies, we recognize, in particular, the need
for research, development, and large - scale demonstration of and cooperation on
carbon capture and storage.
(See «Scaling up
carbon dioxide
capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons,» a 2009 paper by Howard J. Herzog at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology,
for just one of many sobering takes on what's needed.)
This is necessary
for a range of
technologies, including but not limited to onshore and offshore wind, solar PV and thermal, advanced geothermal, hybrid and electric vehicles and batteries,
carbon capture and storage, nuclear, smart - grid, and high - speed rail.
For fundamental transformation in the energy system, Australia will need some breakthroughs in
technologies such as solar thermal, geothermal, and perhaps biosequestration or [
carbon capture and storage].