Not exact matches
But fossil fuels will
still serve as a source of energy demand, and so the only way to achieve our goal is through
carbon -
capture technology.
The lion's share of these anticipated reductions are to come from
carbon capture and storage, a
technology that is
still very much in the experimental phase.
But even if the
carbon released during production were somehow
captured and sequestered — a
technology that remains unproven at any meaningful scale — some studies indicate that liquid coal would
still release 4 to 8 percent more global warming pollution than regular gasoline.
As our ongoing Energy Challenge series and plenty of independent studies have made clear, the country and world are
still not engaged seriously in advancing non-polluting energy
technologies, from solar cells to the elusive notion of
capturing carbon dioxide from power plants at a large scale and stashing it somewhere.
More efficient power plants and
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technology could boost prospects for coal, but the latter
still faces significant regulatory, policy and technical barriers that make its deployment uncertain.
I
still think this 2010 paper by Howard J. Herzog at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology very nicely lays out what to look for to gauge if countries are serious about this issue: «Scaling up
carbon dioxide
capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons.»
With the energy costs of
carbon capture still very high, the question of whether CCS is taken up in practice will be answered by the
carbon price and the cost of the
technology.
Still, we are cautiously optimistic that
carbon capture and storage could represent one of the most important next - generation low -
carbon technologies.
The only other American project to receive funding is another Tenaska effort, a plan
still in its early stages to retrofit with
carbon capture technology a coal - fired power plant in Louisiana.
And to achieve the Agreement's goals, they say controversial and
still - unproven
technologies − including bio-energy and
carbon capture and storage − will be needed.
With the world
still reliant on fossil fuels, the deployment of
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technology is critical, but there are no commercial plants in operation, the report said.
Besides the fact that
carbon dioxide is plant food and so the very opposite of pollution, the
technology of
carbon - dioxide
capture on a full - scale power plant is
still a technological fantasy.
For now the
technology of
capturing and storing
carbon emissions is unproven, expensive and
still in the research stage.
Here it is: New analysis from WWF shows that even with
carbon capture and storage
technology, the emissions for tar sands - based oil are
still well in excess
Global warming emissions from burning coal could be reduced by planting trees and using
technology still in development to
capture carbon dioxide from smokestacks, he said in the report.
The IEA highlights that urgent action is needed to support
Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS)
technologies, which made important strides last year but
still lags far behind other low -
carbon technologies.
Likewise, the
technology to
capture carbon emissions from coal plants and bury it underground is
still in its infancy.