Sentences with phrase «carbon fee proposal»

That is why the carbon fee proposal is so attractive — it provides another avenue through which we can further reduce our carbon footprint.»

Not exact matches

Yet even liberal groups call her «fee» proposal what it truly is — a «direct carbon tax.»
Legendary Climate Scientist Likes a GOP Proposal on Global Warming James Hansen, the «father of climate change awareness,» wants the same carbon fee — and - dividend strategy proposed by Republicans https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/legendary-climate-scientist-likes-a-gop-proposal-on-global-warming/
Readers who actually want a thorough and careful account of the pros and cons of I - 732 from a policy point of view should read the three detailed articles by the Sightline Institute here: http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/01/pros-cons-carbonwa-carbon-tax-swap-ballot-initiative-732/ http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/02/does-initiative-732-carbon-tax-have-a-budget-hole/ http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/03/weighing-critiques-of-carbonwa-i-732/ Readers who are interested in the messy political conflict over the initiative might start with a couple of Patrick Mazza's articles: http://cascadiaplanet.blogspot.com/2015/11/can-wa-state-climate-policy-train-wreck.html http://cascadiaplanet.blogspot.com/2015/12/wa-climate-initiative-conflict-on-road.html If you want to know why the Alliance's proposal won't do much for low - income families facing higher energy costs as a result of a carbon fee (though it would produce a lot of union trade jobs by funding State infrastructure spending) start here: http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/16/green-stamps-a-climate-equity-proposal-for-the-pacific-northwest/
This means the proposal not only ensures that families with low incomes are not burdened by a carbon fee, but in fact will provide an income boost to these families and reduce income inequality.
Surprisingly, the GOP offices seemed to be much more open minded about Citizens» Climate Lobby's proposal of carbon fee and dividend.
The proposal to put a fee - per - ton on carbon and rebating the proceeds to residents is supported by prominent economists, both liberal and conservative, and environmental experts, as a market - driven way to reduce carbon consumption by encouraging energy conservation and use of renewable energy sources.
The proposal requires fossil fuel companies doing business in the District to pay a fee for every ton of carbon dioxide they put into the atmosphere.
The Carbon Fee Rebate proposal would rebate the proceeds of the carbon fee to DC residents on a per - capita basFee Rebate proposal would rebate the proceeds of the carbon fee to DC residents on a per - capita basfee to DC residents on a per - capita basis.
Moreover, the proposal to return this tax to District residents vis periodic rebate checks would be a wonderful thing for District residents, provided that residents who use a reasonable amount of carbon - emitting energy over a period of time are able to recoup the fees they paid.
In the particular case of the carbon cycle, the closest and best argued proposal for privatization I've seen is the Fee & Dividend system as proposed by the Citizen's Climate Lobby (http://citizensclimatelobby.org/node/398).
Then, he shared his favorite solution to reduce the threat of change: CCL's carbon fee and dividend proposal.
I enjoyed sharing about my involvement with Citizens» Climate Lobby and explaining the details of their carbon fee and dividend proposal.
Mark your calendars now and plan to call your U.S. Senators and U.S. Representative on or before Friday, June 9, to support Citizens Climate Lobby's «carbon fee and dividend» proposal and other action to address climate change.
On the eve of the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit, Dr. Hansen's NY Times op - ed, «Cap and Fade» forcefully critiqued proposals for cap - and - trade with offsets, arguing instead for an upstream carbon «fee» with all revenue returned directly to taxpayers via monthly «dividends.»
There are many proposals on the table to price carbon: carbon taxes, carbon fee & dividend, polluter penalties, and cap and trade schemes.
Energy Guardian (2/14/13) reports: «Senate Environment and Public Works Chairman Barbara Boxer on Thursday put a new carbon emissions fee bill on track for committee action by this summer, even as the chances for the proposal to be enacted appeared slim... The fee is part of a package of two climate bills by Boxer, D - Calif., and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I - Vt., that sidesteps President Barack Obama's call for a market - based mechanism to cut greenhouse gas emissions.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z