That is why
the carbon fee proposal is so attractive — it provides another avenue through which we can further reduce our carbon footprint.»
Not exact matches
Yet even liberal groups call her «
fee»
proposal what it truly is — a «direct
carbon tax.»
Legendary Climate Scientist Likes a GOP
Proposal on Global Warming James Hansen, the «father of climate change awareness,» wants the same
carbon fee — and - dividend strategy proposed by Republicans https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/legendary-climate-scientist-likes-a-gop-
proposal-on-global-warming/
Readers who actually want a thorough and careful account of the pros and cons of I - 732 from a policy point of view should read the three detailed articles by the Sightline Institute here: http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/01/pros-cons-carbonwa-
carbon-tax-swap-ballot-initiative-732/ http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/02/does-initiative-732-
carbon-tax-have-a-budget-hole/ http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/03/weighing-critiques-of-carbonwa-i-732/ Readers who are interested in the messy political conflict over the initiative might start with a couple of Patrick Mazza's articles: http://cascadiaplanet.blogspot.com/2015/11/can-wa-state-climate-policy-train-wreck.html http://cascadiaplanet.blogspot.com/2015/12/wa-climate-initiative-conflict-on-road.html If you want to know why the Alliance's
proposal won't do much for low - income families facing higher energy costs as a result of a
carbon fee (though it would produce a lot of union trade jobs by funding State infrastructure spending) start here: http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/16/green-stamps-a-climate-equity-
proposal-for-the-pacific-northwest/
This means the
proposal not only ensures that families with low incomes are not burdened by a
carbon fee, but in fact will provide an income boost to these families and reduce income inequality.
Surprisingly, the GOP offices seemed to be much more open minded about Citizens» Climate Lobby's
proposal of
carbon fee and dividend.
The
proposal to put a
fee - per - ton on
carbon and rebating the proceeds to residents is supported by prominent economists, both liberal and conservative, and environmental experts, as a market - driven way to reduce
carbon consumption by encouraging energy conservation and use of renewable energy sources.
The
proposal requires fossil fuel companies doing business in the District to pay a
fee for every ton of
carbon dioxide they put into the atmosphere.
The
Carbon Fee Rebate proposal would rebate the proceeds of the carbon fee to DC residents on a per - capita bas
Fee Rebate
proposal would rebate the proceeds of the
carbon fee to DC residents on a per - capita bas
fee to DC residents on a per - capita basis.
Moreover, the
proposal to return this tax to District residents vis periodic rebate checks would be a wonderful thing for District residents, provided that residents who use a reasonable amount of
carbon - emitting energy over a period of time are able to recoup the
fees they paid.
In the particular case of the
carbon cycle, the closest and best argued
proposal for privatization I've seen is the
Fee & Dividend system as proposed by the Citizen's Climate Lobby (http://citizensclimatelobby.org/node/398).
Then, he shared his favorite solution to reduce the threat of change: CCL's
carbon fee and dividend
proposal.
I enjoyed sharing about my involvement with Citizens» Climate Lobby and explaining the details of their
carbon fee and dividend
proposal.
Mark your calendars now and plan to call your U.S. Senators and U.S. Representative on or before Friday, June 9, to support Citizens Climate Lobby's «
carbon fee and dividend»
proposal and other action to address climate change.
On the eve of the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit, Dr. Hansen's NY Times op - ed, «Cap and Fade» forcefully critiqued
proposals for cap - and - trade with offsets, arguing instead for an upstream
carbon «
fee» with all revenue returned directly to taxpayers via monthly «dividends.»
There are many
proposals on the table to price
carbon:
carbon taxes,
carbon fee & dividend, polluter penalties, and cap and trade schemes.
Energy Guardian (2/14/13) reports: «Senate Environment and Public Works Chairman Barbara Boxer on Thursday put a new
carbon emissions
fee bill on track for committee action by this summer, even as the chances for the
proposal to be enacted appeared slim... The
fee is part of a package of two climate bills by Boxer, D - Calif., and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I - Vt., that sidesteps President Barack Obama's call for a market - based mechanism to cut greenhouse gas emissions.»