Sentences with phrase «carbon fee rises»

If the carbon fee rises continually and predictably, the resulting energy transformations should generate many jobs, a welcome benefit for nations still suffering from long - standing economic recession.

Not exact matches

Imagine if a bloc of countries favoring action had agreed on a common gradually rising carbon fee collected within each of country at domestic mines and ports of entry.

Energy efficiency and alternative low - carbon and no - carbon energies should be allowed to compete on an equal footing, without subsidies, and the public and business community should be made aware that the fee will continually rise.

As the carbon fee gradually rose and as additional nations, for their own benefit, joined this bloc of nations, development of carbon - free energies and energy efficiency would have been spurred.

Economic efficiency would be improved by a rising carbon fee.

If, in contrast, leading nations agree in 2015 to have internal rising fees on carbon with border duties on products from nations without a carbon fee, a foundation would be established for phaseover to carbon free energies and stable climate.

In the video, Hansen doesn't discuss his preferred mechanism for propelling a shift away from fossil fuels — a rising fee on carbon - containing fuels that is fully returned to citizens.

In the case of climate, the fee would have to steadily rise to propel a steady shift away from energy choices that come with a lot of carbon dioxide releases, and it'd have to encompass all sources (and perhaps credit «sinks,» like new forests, that sop up the gases).

A steadily rising fee on the production of fossil fuels based on the carbon emissions that will be released when they are burned will raise the price of fossil fuels, not all energy options.

However, I want it to be clear that, although I - 732 is the closest proposed law to a simple honest carbon fee and dividend, a good example for other states and nations of a nearly revenue - neutral rising carbon fee, the national fee - and - dividend should be simpler, with 100 % of the money collected from the fossil fuel industry distributed uniformly to the public.

Benefits of the carbon fee - and - dividend (in which an across - the - board rising carbon fee is collected from fossil fuel companies at the domestic mine or port — of - entry, with 100 % of the money given to the public, an equal amount to each citizen) include the following:

They now have several hundred chapters and thousands of volunteers, who write letters - to - the editor and visit congressional representatives, so that, when the court gives the order, there will be understanding and support for the approach that can actually work: an across - the - board rising carbon fee with the funds distributed equally to all residents.

C. Technically, it is still possible to solve the climate problem, but there are two essential requirements: (1) a simple across - the - board (all fossil fuels) rising carbon fee [2] collected from fossil fuel companies at the domestic source (mine or port of entry), not a carbon price «scheme,» and the money must go to the public, not to government coffers, otherwise the public will not allow the fee to rise as needed for phase - over to clean energy, (2) honest government support for, rather than strangulation of, RD&D (research, development and demonstration) of clean energy technologies, including advanced generation, safe nuclear power.

We stand united in our call for a fair, meaningful and steadily rising carbon fee, rebate, and investment solution that will equitably achieve DC's greenhouse gas emissions goals.

I support creating a gradually rising fee on all carbon fuels and then rebating the revenue in equal shares to every single resident of the nation's capital.

Gaining their support for a rising revenue - neutral carbon fee, which is in fact a conservative approach, is possible.

The carbon fee would be an insurance policy aimed at rapidly dropping the emissions blamed with increasing the average temperature of the world's land and atmosphere, which are linked by scientists to increased melting of glaciers and icecaps and rising sea levels that pose a direct threat to south Louisiana, he said.

c. Only workable solution: rising across — the — board flat fee on carbon, collected from fossil companies at point where fossil fuel enters domestic market (domestic mine or port of entry).

The focus of CCL's lobbying efforts is a bill that will put a steadily - rising fee on carbon - based fuels and return the revenue to all households.

However, that optimism is based on the assumption that we are close to the point when it is widely recognized that a policy with an across - the - board rising carbon fee that rapidly phases down carbon emissions also makes good economic sense.

Citizens» Climate Lobby recommends a policy known as «carbon fee and dividend,» — a steadily rising fee is placed on fuels based on the amount of CO2 they will emit when burned.

Imagine if a bloc of countries favoring action had agreed on a common gradually rising carbon fee collected within each of country at domestic mines and ports of entry.

We conclude elsewhere and reaffirm in our present paper that the crisis calls for an across - the - board rising carbon fee and international technical cooperation in carbon - free technologies.

If, in contrast, leading nations agree in 2015 to have internal rising fees on carbon with border duties on products from nations without a carbon fee, a foundation would be established for phaseover to carbon free energies and stable climate.

As the carbon fee gradually rose and as additional nations, for their own benefit, joined this bloc of nations, development of carbon - free energies and energy efficiency would have been spurred.

As both the fee and the household dividend rise steadily, each year, a clear, economy - wide price signal is sent to all investors, calling capital from the sidelines to finance new, low - carbon alternatives.

The transformation of our fossil fuels - based energy system to reliance on energy efficiency, renewable energy and sustainable fuels won't happen fast enough without carbon fees or taxes sending the appropriate persistent and rising price signals into every corner of the economy and every aspect of life.

With a carbon fee - and - rebate policy called the Climate and Community Reinvestment Act of D.C., companies that buy and sell fossil fuels in the District would pay a steadily - rising fee on each ton of heat - trapping pollution they cause.

The rising fee will be charged to the roughly 1,140 fossil fuel producers via a simple line item on their monthly / quarterly estimated tax filings, and the rising dividends will be distributed equally to every citizen regardless of how much carbon they consume.

However, I found the revenue - neutral Carbon Fee & Dividend solution by Citizens» Climate Lobby to be far superior to just a carbon tax because it protects consumers like us who will bear the brunt of these rising carbon costs, especially low - income households, who pay a higher percentage of their income on energy.

As much as we love carbon fee - and - dividend, with its powerful logic of linking rising carbon taxes to rising «green checks,» the revulsion against Trump and the G.O.P. could make it harder to sell progressives on programs with a seemingly middle - of - the - road cast.

Thus Nordhaus's DICE model says that the price of carbon emissions should eventually rise to more than $ 200 a ton, effectively more than quadrupling the cost of coal, but that most of that increase should come late this century, with a much more modest initial fee of around $ 30 a ton.

«The message for policymakers is that we have a global crisis that calls for international cooperation to reduce emissions as rapidly as practical,» the study states, before endorsing a rising carbon fee as a policy solution.

Citizens Climate Lobby is pushing for a national carbon fee and dividend that puts a rising cost on greenhouse gasses and returns it to households equally.

The carbon tax outlined in the council's brief begins with a $ 40 / ton CO2 fee, which would rise over time at an as - yet unspecified rate.

Hansen describes it as a «flat, across - the - board rising fee on carbon emissions» that would be levied on fossil fuels at a domestic mine or port of entry.

A fee - and - dividend system imposes a fee on the initial sale of a fossil fuel which is then redistributed to the public; the rising cost of carbon - intensive products would, it is hoped, encourage families to keep their carbon footprints low.