In addition to its pivotal role in the atmosphere in the regulation of global climate, CO2 and its sister chemical species, HCO3 — and CO32 - comprise
the carbonate buffer system which regulates the pH of seawater.
Not exact matches
The addition of anthropogenic CO2 alters the thermodynamic
buffer factors (e.g., the Revelle factor) of the
carbonate system, decreasing the seagrass habitat's ability to
buffer natural
carbonate system fluctuations.
A simple glance at the
buffering power of the
carbonate equilibrium
system and the vast reservoir of DIC in the oceans would lead one to guess that CO2 acidification would be negligible — but it's the rate of change, not the long - term equilibria, that matters in terms of the real - time effect.
The resulting decline in the
buffering capacity of the inorganic
carbonate system (increasing Revelle factor) sets up a theoretically predicted feedback loop whereby the invasion of anthropogenic CO2 reduces the ocean's ability to uptake additional CO2.
The geochemical equilibrium
system anorthite CaAl2Si2O8 — kaolinite Al2Si2O5 (OH) 4 has by the pH of ocean water a
buffer capacity which is thousand times larger than a 0.001 M
carbonate solution (Stumm & Morgan, 1970).
Furthermore, this
carbonate buffer is not the only
buffer active in the atmosphere / hydrosphere / lithosphere
system.
It's interesting to consider that the pH of both the oceans and your blood is maintained by
carbonate (and / or bicarbonate)
buffers that keep the
system from getting too far out of whack.
So how, over the course of a few decades did «Science» decide that
Carbonates now the dominating
buffer system in the oceans?
I know it's been a lot of years since I studied Aquatic Chemistry, but I suspect that Silicates are still the dominating oceanic
buffer system and
Carbonates have only minor effects.