Sentences with phrase «care about global warming»

Do these other people truly care about global warming?

While some austerity mongers, like David Cameron in Britain, claim to care about global warming and may believe that the fictional shortage of government money he promotes is a stand - in for the real shortage of atmospheric assets of the earth, the overall effect of austerity is to, as with neoliberalism more generally, to undermine the critically important instrument of government at exactly the time when it is needed most.

The study informs an ongoing discussion among people who care about global warming.

Since hurricanes don't seem to care about global warming in the least either way, why should we?

The only people who care about global warming are the greenies and people they have frightened or misled.

Since its launch, more than 150,000 people in 160 countries have visited the site — but the jury is still out on whether those who care about global warming will be motivated to participate.

They may care about global warming but the depth of their care for nature will atrophy, unless they're personally engaged with the outdoors.»

I care about global warming, and I am not particular willing to accept it as an article of faith.

He starts to address this question in his post, but dribbles off and shifts the focus to a couple of surveys that show people deeply care about global warming — even when there's abundant evidence that much of public attitude on climate is, as I've been saying, the equivalent of water sloshing in a shallow pan — lots of fluctuations, little depth or commitment (particularly when money is involved).

Well if they care about global warming they should, because we are poised for a world of plug - in SUVs running on coal.

Even if you don't care about global warming or sea levels, power and unproductive employees cost money.

After this first blush reading of just this issue, if someone cares about global warming, they should work to see that McCain is nominated on the Republican side.

What is an earnest green who cares about global warming to do now?

These are not the actions of a society or a state that really cares about global warming.

China has shown the world how much it truly cares about global warming by burning significantly more dirty, carbon - unfriendly coal than it previously pretended.

Steven Goddard has amassed massive amounts of graphs and data evidence of fraud with GISS, NOAA, BOM ect., No one actually cares or is even looking at this study, Hopefully it is because no one cares about global warming anymore except a few warmist fanatics and skeptics etc... Only serious legal action funded by a wealthy skeptic or the like will actually make anyone notice that is the sad fact I'm afraid.

Indeed, if R Gates cares about global warming he must not be concerned about misogynistic mass murderers sufficiently.

By the way, FAN, here's what someone who actually cares about global warming looks like Bjorn Lomborg: «The UN Climate Summit in Lima achieved little, just like the previous meetings for more than 20 years.

Not exact matches

I can have differences of opinion with my friends about health care or global warming or eschatology or women in church leadership without taking it personally or holding a grudge.

I'm all about taking care of the environment but global warming is a way for the govenment to control and scare it's people.

They can say «Hey look, one of you smart people decided to come back to our ideology of «ignorance is bliss» where we don't need to worry about global warming, or sharing what we have with the poor or any science and wellfare stuff at all because God will just take care of it...»

Global warming is dependent upon the atmospheric CO2 concentration, so we need to care about carbon.

I don't care about consensus, but for what it's worth: 10 out of 17 means a 59 % consensus that climate sensitivity is likely to be 2C or lower and as such global warming is not dangerous according to UN politically agreed criteria.

In this case, you had to read six paragraphs down to get the message people would care about and even argue heatedly about, which could have sparked headings like «Global Warming From CO2 Likely Lowballed».

What they're talking about, whether they know it or not, or care to acknowledge it or not, is global warming.

The International Energy Agency estimates that an 80 % chance of keeping global warming to within 2C of pre-industrial temperatures would require investment of roughly $ 1 trillion per year up to 2050, about 10 % of existing expenditure on health care.

This is especially true for eco-friendly singles who care about important issues like global warming and pollution.

I would recommend this movie to anyone concerned obout global warming or to anyone who truely cares about saving our forests.

I care about nature - surroundings which are threatened by industrial development and the massive costs created by global warming and unbridled capitalism and twist the attitude of contemporary human beings and society.

They don't care to abide by the law anymore than they care about controlling global warming.

Although I'm not an expert on Branson, my understanding is that he cares for the environment and is concerned about global warming, but / and he also sees the future, and the future involves higher fuel efficiencies and more environment - friendly energy sources.

Global warming is just part of climate change, and it is climate change that we must care about, because the way we live depends on a stable climate, with adequate rain, without droughts and / or increased flooding.

David Tenenbaum # 8 (Gee, when we have a bunch of candidates that don't seem to «believe» in evolution, who don't care what happens to the planet because they discount what science tells us about global warming, I can't think a «science debate» is such a bad idea.)

N. Y. Times (Aug. 8, 08)- We are much more likely to experience global freezing than we are global warming in the future but who cares about facts - please check out Earth's geological and climatic history before reachin any conclusions - g

Gee, when we have a bunch of candidates that don't seem to «believe» in evolution, who don't care what happens to the planet because they discount what science tells us about global warming, I can't think a «science debate» is such a bad idea.

From the standpoint of doing something about global warming, the uncertainties are irrelevant unless we don't care what kind of world we leave for future generations - of humans and polar bears.

The piece falls into the partisan trap of painting all opponents in one color when in fact there are conservatives who care about science and energy, even some (Charles Krauthammer comes to mind) who — while challenging the portrayal of global warming as a real - time crisis — see the value in a high tax on gasoline, swapped for lower taxes elsewhere.

Ousted congressman Bob Inglis (R - SC) has a theory about why he lost this year's midterm primary: conservative voters did not much care for Inglis's belief in global warming.

Well, apparently Mr. Revkin took offense that I suggested he may not care about future generations because he emailed me to tell me so, explaining that he wrote so many articles on global warming, etc. etc..

If you don't care about humans and the other species here, global warming may not be all that important; nature has caused warmer and colder times in the past, and life survived.

Would anybody else reading on this thread care to clue him in about how many people in «climatology» and the allied sciences must be said (to paraphrase Kipling) «to have been shown the way to promotion and pay» through their allegiance to the anthropogenic global warming fraud?

You seem to assume that a proof for human global warming has occured, and don't care about the (scientific) proof for that.

The end - of - the - world prognostications from the Left of global warming catastrophe that never came but, the Left never cared if they were right or wrong about that and it does not worry them that the EPA prefers politics to science.

Posted in Global Warming Comments Off on Americans Care Deeply About «Global Warming» — But Not «Climate Change»

Well, maybe there's an element of natural variability in the global climate that doesn't care about your SUV any more than it did back in the medieval warm period.

To those of us who have dared to question on scientific and economic grounds the official story on global warming, it is a continuing surprise that there is so little concern about whether or not that story is objectively true... The herd and the hive do not care.

Except that this is a game played by Western civilization on itself by Westerners — no one else is listening — and, other than people like Al Gore — who could care less about truth — the bad actors of global warming alarmism that are still left are so far to the Left that they will probably be seen more as communists than scientists.

Environmental activists should stop talking about global warming because no one cares.

I assume the question about the military using those heaters despite pretending to be concerned about global warming was rhetorical, since Dennie herself has often answered it: They don't care!

If we take the Politicians, Oil, Coal & Chemical companies out of the picture for a moment and just look at the people that they designed their Skeptical Anti-man induced Global Warming spins for... you clearly see a huge group of hateful and stupid people who don't care what the issue is about, as long as it deviates from what they consider a Liberal view... they're happy.