There has been a «resurgence,» so to speak, of media
caring about religious subplots and overtones.
Yet as someone who
cares about religious liberty, I remain nervous, for there appears to be more than one Mitt Romney.
The Romans really didn't
care about your religious beliefs.
You are naive to not
care about his religious beliefs.
And those who
care about religious liberty should know at least as much about that case, McCullen v. Coakley, as they do about the more narrowly decided case with which the Court ended its term.
The article is only irrelevant if the voting public ignores, or at least doesn't
care about religious beliefs.
School is their to teach our kids and get them ready for the real world who
cares about religious holidays.
If
we care about religious freedom, we're more likely to be purveyors of those stories.
So who
cares about religious people, you can't convince someone of reality when they fabricate their own, they fabricate their proof, their facts, best thing is just do your thing and stay way from them as much possible, most of the times they turn more people into atheists than atheists themselves by the things they say and do anyway, lol so no need for us to do it.
Beck is giving good advice whether
you care about the religious aspects of it is one thing but at least he has the good sense to say something and people should take heed.
I don't think the trial was the first time that she connected Christian Scientist with the lack of medical intervention, I got the impression that she didn't
care about the religious context, but only the motivation of the people involved.
Not exact matches
It no longer
cares about our ancient blood and
religious ties with Britain or Europe, or
about the crucial strategic roles of our European and East Asian allies.
And «Prof» Stevie P again «sits» in judgement but who
cares what he professes since he refuses to be honest
about his own beliefs, something all
religious «experts» should do before pontificating.
Hey Swine, show me one single post here where an atheist
cares about the sex life of a
religious person.
I don't
care about how school buildings are used unless teachers in those buildings are forced to teach a particular
religious belief.
To fix this we need to put in people who can actually think and
care about the people and not some hypocrite that can't eve follow their own
religious teachings.
I also do not
care about church history as I am not
religious.
Too bad most of the «
religious» leaders in this country don't
care about spirituality.
It's not arrogance, it's reality... something I know
religious people don't
care about.
He
cared about people more than His own reputation with the
religious establishment.
You'd better
care about Romney's
religious background.
I don't
care about Romney's
religious background nearly so much as I do the lack of integrity he displayed in so readily backtracking on a number of important ethical and legal issues in order to appeal to the Republicans» conservative Christian national base.
First, who really
cares what the Church, or any other
religious organization thinks
about policy?
Right wing
religious extremists don't
care about the scientific process all they want to do is promote the dogma.
For example, we have an atheist Prime Minister — and no one
cares because this is personal (it is not
about her politics)-- just as public schools are used for general education and
religious education is served by your place of worship, associated community, family, etc..
A true atheist should
care less
about religious displays.
An overly long article describing how the devout struggles over something no one
cares about, and a professional opinion from BU telling us that these
religious nutjobs are taking things way too seriously.
But my entire point, Bob, is based on the premise that
religious believers do not
care, repeat, do not
care, one iota,
about «proof.»
ID people know they can't test it and that it's worthless they just don't
care because ID isn't
about science, it's
about religious evangelism..
I could
care less
about the
religious aspect, but it is not my responsibility to buy your healthcare...
I don't even really
care whether «
religious ecstasy» is local or regional within the brain, what I
care about is intellectual honesty.
Besides if all the American people
care about is the person's
religious affiliation, then we are in big trouble.
We
care about a candidates
religious beliefs because we fear what the candidate might do to us in the name of religion.
«There's no issue in the world I
care more
about than
religious liberty.
That's how the world got Bush and Hitler...
religious poeople
care about faith over humanity.Thanks a lot children...
He must necessarily be concerned
about the
care of all the people regardless of their particular
religious affiliation or non-affiliation.
A church or other
religious body which
cares about human love will offer its service, its wisdom, and its ritual to those who wish to have them; but it will not control the legal foundations of marriage according to its own prescriptions.
I don't
care if people agree with my
religious beliefs, what I do
care about is that they know I don't sacrifice babies or engage in homilies to Satan during ritual.
Hypocrits are what they all are and part of a Corporate
Religious Ministry that has no shame, or guilt
about hording their riches, while the voiceless go hungry and without basic health
care.
Huckabee's 2008 Iowa victory and Santorum's surge suggest that, in spite of the dominant stereotypes
about evangelicals, they value
religious authenticity more than rhetoric and
care about more issues than gay - marriage and abortion.
As to your
religious beliefs, you don't have a damn thing to say
about what a person does in their private life, including their health -
care decisions.
Pay, however, is a sound indicator of how much
religious communities
care about the quality of their leadership.
I am an atheist — I do not
care about any faith's
religious head attire.
But that's not the case here, and from the sounds of it, most
religious leaders couldn't
care less
about the ads.
Well, the best I can say at the moment is that the president - elect, in addition to his recent conversion to the pro-life cause, does not appear to
care one way or the other
about religious liberty.
I could
care a less
about their
religious retardation issue... FINE THEM!
Without minimizing the difficulties, theological schools and the
religious groups they serve must ask themselves the hard questions: Do we
care about the quality of
religious leaders we educate?
If you
care about your way of life, then you should
care about this even if you are not
religious.
If you don't
care very much
about religion, you're not likely to oppose state action for
religious reasons.
and then they are excommunicated and the fight is over... this is a hopeless fight especially when religion is involved... they either fight for rights and lose it all (and essentially go to hell) or give in and listen to their
religious leaders... I do not believe in what they do and could
care less really but they are in a no win situation and they as nuns should not be worried
about birth control or anything of the such... they took the vows..