Sentences with phrase «care costs mean»

It's a fact of life that economic downturns, increased life expectancies, reduced benefits, and rising health care costs mean your retirement dollars need to stretch even further.

Economic downturns, increased life expectancies, and rising health care costs mean your retirement nest egg needs to stretch even further.

Test of equality of health care cost means for patients with a medical condition according to their FP and patients with Health anxiety were done by computing the bootstrap test statistic achieved significance level (ASL)[38].

Not exact matches

The Trump administration's moves on Obamacare last week — including the decision to stop paying subsidies meant to lower low - income enrollees» out - of - pocket medical costs to insurance companies — have dominated health care headlines.

The founders planned to sell to Medicare Advantage health plans and at - risk medical providers, which meant they had to reduce costs as well as improve care.

Working longer can mean lower costs on the health - care side, according to McClanahan, as many individuals are able to take advantage of company health plans.

That meant finding a way to take care of the # 3,700 ($ 5,700 USD) cost of the program.

According to the Health Care Cost Institute, about 43 % of all spending by individuals with employer - sponsored insurance in 2011 was shoppable, meaning that it was spent on medical services whose prices could be significantly lowered without compromising quality.

Those rules could mean that doctors end up eating the cost of the care they have already provided, or have their receivables stay unpaid for longer stretches of time.

Publicly funded full - day kindergarten means parents no longer have to shell out for 10 months of child care for their five - year - olds (and, in Ontario, four - year - olds)-- a major cost savings.

Rising health care costs across the board mean you could be setting yourself up for financial struggles come retirement — especially if you haven't set aside enough money for one of your biggest expenses: long - term care.

Health insurers have a multibillion - dollar opportunity to lead a digital transformation of healthcare that will mean lower costs and better care for patients.

The retirement of the baby boomers over the next several decades will mean astronomic increases in costs, notably for health care, with relatively fewer people of working age to pay them.

They don't care Google will come along and pan all their client rankings, a low cost outsource model and an investment in aggressive outbound sales means they will just churn through sites burning clients as they go.

Also, another very helpful FHA feature is the 6 % sellers assist, which means most buyers only need to bring 3.5 % to the table (the down payment), and the seller can take care of the rest (the closing costs).

Its object is to make broader health insurance coverage available to women and, by that means, both to improve women's health and to eliminate disparities between men and women in the cost of health care.

This means we go to enormous lengths and at unbelievable costs to care for her and love her.

David Brooks has a very thoughtful column on the fact that a lot of soaring health care costs have to do using all means available to keep very sick people alive just a little bit longer.

I think the question is problematic as I think most people interpret it to mean quality of care rather than cost.

Big, ambitious politics means doing «something about the high cost of health care,» ending our «addiction to oil,» bringing «our brave men and women» home from Iraq.

Unclear what, exactly, President Obama meant in his Inaugural Address when he said, «We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its cost.»

and the «cost» of REASONABLY AND RATIONALLY embracing the basic tenets of Chrisitanity need not be so great... (i mean, you got ta care something about other people, etc).

Atheists should live a life which maximized pleasure and minimizes pain at ANY costs since there is not TRUE transcendental meaning in life and NOT care what anyone else thinks.

However, that means that the rest of us are already paying for care to the poor through higher costs, insurance premiums, etc..

They want to stay in power and to keep the general populace so busy arguing over issues like guns, abortion, gay marriage, etc that we don't notice / care / understand they are squeezing billions and trillions of dollars out of the economy for their corporate overloads (and themselves), while we are all meant to greatful for a cost of living adjustment and hopefully being able to own a home.

As the US Federal government pays for a greater and greater fraction of health care, I see it as inevitable that an increasing amount of care is provided by mid-level staff as a means of cost control.

Also, going into daycare and not being potty trained can also mean a higher cost of the child care too.

The Care.com 2016 Cost of Care Survey revealed what your different child care options mean for your wallet and how you can save moCare.com 2016 Cost of Care Survey revealed what your different child care options mean for your wallet and how you can save moCare Survey revealed what your different child care options mean for your wallet and how you can save mocare options mean for your wallet and how you can save money.

For low risk women without complicating conditions at the start of care in labour, the mean incremental cost effectiveness ratios associated with switches from planned birth in obstetric unit to non-obstetric unit settings fell in the south west quadrant of the cost effectiveness plane (representing, on average, reduced costs and worse outcomes).25 The mean incremental cost effectiveness ratios ranged from # 143382 (alongside midwifery units) to # 497595 (home)(table 4 ⇓).

Restriction of the analyses to low risk women without complicating conditions at the start of care in labour narrowed the cost differences between planned places of birth: total mean costs were # 1511 for an obstetric unit, # 1426 for an alongside midwifery unit, # 1405 for a free standing midwifery unit, and for # 1027 the home (table 2 ⇓).

Profiles of resource use, and their associated unit costs, for each planned place of birth are reported in detail in appendices 1 and 2 on bmj.com.25 The total mean costs per low risk woman planning birth in the various settings at the start of care in labour were # 1631 ($ 1950, $ 2603) for an obstetric unit, # 1461 ($ 1747, $ 2332) for an alongside midwifery unit, # 1435 ($ 1715, $ 2290) for a free standing midwifery unit, and # 1067 ($ 1274, $ 1701) for the home (table 1 ⇓).

And there was a study that came out on 2010 that showed that one - third of American families experience diaper need, meaning, they have to cut back on basic necessities like food, utilities, and child - care, in order to buy diapers because diapers can cost up to 3000 dollars for each child over the time you are diapering.

Maternal health: the cost of buying formula, the time spent finding fuel and preparing infant milk feeds or caring for a sick child mean that a mother also benefits from breastfeeding.

This means that when a child spends an almost equal number of days with each parent, each parent is providing about the same care for the child and accrues about the same costs.

The associated costs for all stages of antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care were calculated and presented as the mean cost per woman per group.

That means even if your baby is born with a health condition, you can rest easy knowing that his care will be covered and you won't bear the cost alone.

The increasing survival rates of soldiers having lost multiple limbs means care costs and compensation will continue to be on the agenda, while issues such as post traumatic stress disorder for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans may not fully emerge for decades.

That means that (at the current poverty level), the highest cost of a plan is $ 4,244 (cheaper than what you would currently pay for health care).

This means significantly reduced subscriptions for our members working in primary care in England, which is great news at a time when GPs are struggling with indemnity costs.»

That means richer pensioners will lose their fuel allowance and may have to contribute more to the costs of their care.

But for many families high child care costs are a real problem and can mean that it doesn't even add up to go to work.

It is worth noting that while people under age 65 in the U.S. live in a heavily market - dominated economy where poor employment outcomes mean poverty and a lack of access to health care, almost everyone over age 65 has most of their healthcare paid for by Medicare, (a FICA tax financed, single payer system that pays providers more or less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost controls), more than half of their nursing home costs paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it pays providers and moderately means tested), and receives enough of a guaranteed income from the combination of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings of their own), above the poverty line, regardless of the state of the local economy.

The 2 % share of the fund is a constitutional requirement meant to help the beneficiaries take care of their medical and other relevant costs.

White Plains Mayor Tom Roach says his Westchester County City id facing increasing costs for health care, and a newly imposed 2 % property tax cap has meant little money left over for anything else.

These funds are meant to transition distressed hospitals to new health care delivery models that are more cost effective.

(CNN)-- President Barack Obama's sweeping health care law came under fresh assault from Republicans over cost and complexity with a Senate lawmaker saying comprehensive doesn't mean comprehendible.

It means recognising that everyone has a contribution to make to the costs of care.

The analysis Now FactCheck has looked at the Labour option for a so - called «death tax» - a means tested compulsory contribution towards your social care costs paid at point of death.

Silver wants to exclude from a cap some government costs — such as pension and health care costs — meaning town governments and school districts would only apply the tax limit to other parts of their budgets, like payroll or equipment, according to Brian Sampson, of Unshackle Upstate, a group that supports the tax cap.

This means that by taking an over-the-counter medication, people can ward off a disease that, according to Alzheimer's Disease International's World Alzheimer Report 2016, affects an estimated 47 million people worldwide, costs health care systems worldwide more than US$ 818 billion per year and is the fifth leading cause of death in those aged 65 or older.