Sentences with phrase «care of a reasonable person»

The property owner will normally be held to the standard of care of a reasonable person acting under the same or similar circumstances.

Not exact matches

But if you keep your prices reasonable and become known for taking extra good care of the boats you transport, you may find people hiring you to take care of this for them anyway.

As Jennifer puts it, Planned Parenthood's primary mission is one that no reasonable person could oppose: general health care for all women, regardless of income.

And I bet none of those healed had any kind of health insurance with huge rip - off insurance companies who charged them ridiculous premiums and then said they wouldn't cover whatever their illness was, or had limits on what they would pay, or gave payoffs to crooked politicians to keep people from getting decent health care at reasonable prices, or forbade them from buying the medications they needed from anywhere they were available, or even had forms to fill out.

But as a reasonable and caring person I can honestly tell you that these poor fanatics and their embarrassingly idiotic claims are, to me no different than any human being who has one shred of actual faith in the bible or any supernatural «relationship» with creator theology.

The law says that all employees have a right to take a reasonable amount of unpaid time off to deal with emergencies involving people you care for.

[31] It is a bill that would address federal adoption incentives and would amend the Social Security Act (SSA) to require the state plan for foster care and adoption assistance to demonstrate that the state agency has developed policies and procedures for identifying, documenting in agency records, and determining appropriate services with respect to, any child or youth over whom the state agency has responsibility for placement, care, or supervision who the state has reasonable cause to believe is, or is at risk of being, a victim of sex trafficking or a severe form of trafficking in persons.

A # 3.7 k tax on a # 400,000 profit (less than 1 % overall) sounds reasonable to me — and the homes of most elderly people in care are typically sold well within three years.

Under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, people have a duty of care not only to ensure that an animal doesn't suffer unnecessarily, but also to take reasonable steps to ensure that the animal's welfare needs are met.

I am not arguing that the elderly, the disabled, etc., need what reasonable people can agree is a basic decent level of health care appropriate to our society and the state of our economy which keeps them alive, but you are advocating giving free health care that exceeds what someone who pays thousands of dollars in insurance premiums every year can receive!

Sensible, Romantic, Passionate, Quiet in some cases, Kind, Caring, Teddy Bear, Cuddle Bug, Sense of Humor... I like making people laugh, Responsible, Reasonable, HONEST / TRUTHFUL.

Working as a volunteer, introduced me to another segment of our society, where people were dependant on charity to ensure a reasonable amount of medical care for their severely sick and / or handicapped child.

A credit services organization or a representative of the organization may not: (1) make or use a false or misleading representation in the offer or sale of the services of the organization, including: (A) guaranteeing to «erase bad credit» or words to that effect unless the representation clearly discloses this can be done only if the credit history is inaccurate or obsolete; and (B) guaranteeing an extension of consumer credit regardless of the person's credit history unless the representation clearly discloses the eligibility requirements for obtaining the extension; or (2) make, or advise a consumer to make, a statement relating to a consumer's credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity that the person knows, or should know by the exercise of reasonable care, to be false or misleading to a: (A) consumer reporting agency; or (B) person who has extended consumer credit to a consumer or to whom a consumer is applying for an extension of consumer credit.

Prohibited acts.A credit services organization, a salesperson, agent, or representative of a credit services organization, or an independent contractor who sells or attempts to sell the services of a credit services organization shall not: (1) Charge a buyer or receive from a buyer money or other valuable consideration before completing performance of all services, other than those described in subdivision (2) of this section, which the credit services organization has agreed to perform for the buyer unless the credit services organization has obtained a surety bond or established and maintained a surety account as provided in section 45 - 805; (2) Charge a buyer or receive from a buyer money or other valuable consideration for obtaining or attempting to obtain an extension of credit that the credit services organization has agreed to obtain for the buyer before the extension of credit is obtained; (3) Charge a buyer or receive from a buyer money or other valuable consideration solely for referral of the buyer to a retail seller who will or may extend credit to the buyer if the credit that is or will be extended to the buyer is substantially the same as that available to the general public; (4) Make or use a false or misleading representation in the offer or sale of the services of a credit services organization, including (a) guaranteeing to erase bad credit or words to that effect unless the representation clearly discloses that this can be done only if the credit history is inaccurate or obsolete and (b) guaranteeing an extension of credit regardless of the person's previous credit problem or credit history unless the representation clearly discloses the eligibility requirements for obtaining an extension of credit; (5) Engage, directly or indirectly, in a fraudulent or deceptive act, practice, or course of business in connection with the offer or sale of the services of a credit services organization; (6) Make or advise a buyer to make a statement with respect to a buyer's credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity that is false or misleading or that should be known by the exercise of reasonable care to be false or misleading to a consumer reporting agency or to a person who has extended credit to a buyer or to whom a buyer is applying for an extension of credit; or (7) Advertise or cause to be advertised, in any manner whatsoever, the services of a credit services organization without filing a registration statement with the Secretary of State under section 45 - 806 unless otherwise provided by the Credit Services Organization Act.

Your liability may be somewhat limited or reduced if the injured person did not exercise reasonable care, such as not walking on a clearly icy sidewalk in high heels with a huge stack of Christmas presents in their arms blocking their view.

(e) Make, or advise a consumer to make, any statement with respect to aconsumer's credit worthiness, credit standing or credit capacity that is falseor misleading, or that should be knownby the exercise of reasonable care to be false or misleading, to a consumerreporting agency or toa person who has extended credit to a consumer or to whom a consumer isapplying for anextension of credit.

(1) A credit services organization, its salespersons, agents, and representatives, and independent contractors who sell or attempt to sell the services of a credit services organization may not do any of the following: (a) conduct any business regulated by this chapter without first: (i) securing a certificate of registration from the division; and (ii) unless exempted under Section 13 -21-4, posting a bond, letter of credit, or certificate of deposit with the division in the amount of $ 100,000; (b) make a false statement, or fail to state a material fact, in connection with an application for registration with the division; (c) charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration prior to full and complete performance of the services the credit services organization has agreed to perform for the buyer; (d) dispute or challenge, or assist a person in disputing or challenging an entry in a credit report prepared by a consumer reporting agency without a factual basis for believing and obtaining a written statement for each entry from the person stating that that person believes that the entry contains a material error or omission, outdated information, inaccurate information, or unverifiable information; (e) charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration solely for referral of the buyer to a retail seller who will or may extend credit to the buyer, if the credit that is or will be extended to the buyer is upon substantially the same terms as those available to the general public; (f) make, or counsel or advise any buyer to make, any statement that is untrue or misleading and that is known, or that by the exercise of reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading, to a credit reporting agency or to any person who has extended credit to a buyer or to whom a buyer is applying for an extension of credit, with respect to a buyer's creditworthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity; (g) make or use any untrue or misleading representations in the offer or sale of the services of a credit services organization or engage, directly or indirectly, in any act, practice, or course of business that operates or would operate as fraud or deception upon any person in connection with the offer or sale of the services of a credit services organization; and (h) transact any business as a credit services organization, as defined in Section 13 -21-2, without first having registered with the division by paying an annual fee set pursuant to Section 63J -1-504 and filing proof that it has obtained a bond or letter of credit as required by Subsection (2).

(3) Make, or advise any buyer to make, any statement that is untrue or misleading, or that should be known by the exercise of reasonable care to be untrue or misleading, with respect to a buyer's credit reporting agency or to any person who has extended credit to a buyer or to whom a buyer has made application for an extension of credit.

(3) Make, or counsel or advise any buyer to make, any statement that is false or misleading or that should be known by the exercise of reasonable care to be false or misleading, or omit any material fact to a consumer reporting agency or to any person who has extended credit to a buyer or to whom a buyer is applying for an extension of credit with respect to a buyer's credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity; or

Make, counsel or advise any buyer to make, any statement which is untrue or misleading and which is known, or which by the exercise of reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading, to a consumer credit reporting agency or to any person who has extended credit to a buyer or to whom a buyer is applying for an extension of credit, with respect to a buyer's creditworthiness, credit standing or credit capacity.

A credit repair business and its salespersons, agents, and representatives, and independent contractors who sell or attempt to sell the services of a credit repair business, shall not do any of the following: (1) Charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration prior to full and complete performance of the services that the credit repair business has agreed to perform for or on behalf of the consumer; (2) Charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration solely for referral of the consumer to a retail seller or to any other credit grantor who will or may extend credit to the consumer, if the credit that is or will be extended to the consumer is upon substantially the same terms as those available to the general public; (3) Represent that it can directly or indirectly arrange for the removal of derogatory credit information from the consumer's credit report or otherwise improve the consumer's credit report or credit standing, provided, this shall not prevent truthful, unexaggerated statements about the consumer's rights under existing law regarding his credit history or regarding access to his credit file; (4) Make, or counsel or advise any consumer to make, any statement that is untrue or misleading and which is known or which by the exercise of reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading, to a consumer reporting agency or to any person who has extended credit to a consumer or to whom a consumer is applying for an extension of credit, with respect to a consumer's creditworthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity; or (5) Make or use any untrue or misleading representations in the offer or sale of the services of a credit repair business or engage, directly or indirectly, in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deception upon any person in connection with the offer or sale of the services of a credit repair business.

(3) To make or to advise a buyer to make a statement with respect to the buyer's creditworthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity that is: (A) false or misleading; or (B) that should be known by the exercise of reasonable care to be false or misleading; to a consumer reporting agency or to a person that has extended credit to the buyer or to whom the buyer is applying for an extension of credit.

(4) Make or advise a buyer to make a statement with respect to a buyer's credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity that is false or misleading or that should be known by the exercise of reasonable care to be false or misleading to a consumer reporting agency or to a person who has extended credit to a buyer.

Under Title 21, Chapter 67, § 1680.4, within seven days of a seizure, the agency that seized the animals will ask its district attorney to file a petition with the courts to mandate that a person pay «reasonable costs» for the care and feeding of the animals throughout the court case.

It shall be the duty of all owners and custodians of animals, to exercise reasonable care and to take all necessary steps and precautions to protect other people, property, and animals from injuries or damage which might result from their animal's behavior, regardless of the instinct or motivation for such behavior.

The Foster Home also agrees to indemnify and hold harmless One Love, its officers, volunteers, agents, employees, contractors and representatives from any and all losses, fines, claims or damages, including reasonable attorneys» fees, arising out of or relating to the foster animal or his / her voluntary foster care of such animal, including any claims for injury or damage to persons or property caused by the foster animal.

Totally a dedicated and fully qualified trainer with all the titles and certificates, plus the bonus of a caring person for everyone (animals and people)!!!!!!!!! The fee charged is better than reasonable (home visits) plus the caring and result factor makes Carol your best investment of a lifetime!

The Foster Home also agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Partnering for Pets, Inc. its officers, volunteers, agents, employees, contractors and representatives from any and all losses, fines, claims or damages, including reasonable attorneys» fees, arising out of or relating to the foster animal or his / her voluntary foster care of such animal, including any claims for injury or damage to persons or property caused by the foster animal.

    (e) Necessary and reasonable veterinary care including vaccinations that are required or recommended by a licensed veterinarian, and care and treatment a reasonably prudent person would find appropriate or necessary for injuries, neglect, illness or disease with records of such care and treatment that are available for inspection at all times.

If the evidence indicates lack of proper and reasonable care of an animal, the burden is on the person to affirmatively demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the person is able and fit to have custody of and provide adequately for an animal.

(e) Any person making inspections under this section shall be trained by the commissioner in reasonable standards of animal care.

The most reasonable approach is not to expect perfection, but to expect and work toward a better quality of life for pets and the people who care for them.

I indemnify, hold harmless and release Judd Foundation, its directors, officers, employees, members, managers, affiliate, agents and contractors from any and all claims, liabilities, loss, damages, costs and expense of any kind whatsoever (including reasonable attorneys fees) by myself or any other person, entity, or corporation, and covenant not to sue or make any other claim arising out of the any communication with Judd Foundation about the preservation, conservation, installation, care, handling or treatment of artwork (s) by Donald Judd.

The law's definition of «allowable expenses» includes «all reasonable charges incurred for reasonably necessary products, services and accommodations for an injured person's care, recovery, or rehabilitation.»

In the context of driving, the duty of care is to drive in the same manner as a reasonable person would under the circumstances.

Therefore the insurer became required to «pay all «reasonable and necessary expenses» for attendant care» but it required that the expenses be «incurred» in that the person has «paid the expense, has promised to pay the expense» and the person providing the services «has sustained an economic loss» as a result of providing the services.

Negligence is the failure to observe reasonable care, and since people ordinarily act reasonably, the plaintiff or defendant may introduce evidence of a custom that is relevant to the issue of negligence.

A person who calls an ambulance has the reasonable expectation of getting the medical care they need and arriving at the hospital safely.

Improper braking technique that rises to the level of negligence happens when a driver breaches his duty to operate the tractor - trailer with the reasonable care expected of a skilled commercial truck operator and causes an accident that leads to harm to another person.

The failure to exercise the requisite standard of care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would exercise in the circumstances, or taking action that a reasonable person would not.

If a person is already taking every reasonable precautionary measure, is he likely to take additional measures, knowing that however much care he takes, it will not serve as a defence in the event of breach?

John can't plead that he happened to have no clue about the effect of falling hammers — the law doesn't care about his personal knowledge, it cares about what a reasonable person would know.

In the Court of Appeal's judgment in Young v Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds)[2006] EWCA Civ 1534, [2007] 1 All ER 895, Lord Justice Dyson summarised the effect of Adams: «The claimant is to be assumed to be a person who has suffered the injury in question, but in all other respects he is to be assumed simply to be a reasonable person.»

Instead, the law requires that a person bringing a birth injury claim based on cerebral palsy or another condition show that the doctor failed to act as a reasonable and prudent doctor would have acted, considering their specialty and the level of care generally used by doctors in the same specialty.

The standard of care for medical professionals is defined as the level of care that a reasonable person, in this case a doctor, would exercise in similar circumstances.

Any adult who owes a duty of reasonable care toward a child may be found to have breached that duty of care if the adult fails to take the precautions any person of ordinary prudence would take to prevent a child from sustaining a burn injury of any kind.

In general, this means that the person responsible for the lot breached the duty of reasonable care owed to visitors.

The plaintiff must prove that the defendant failed to behave with the level of care that a reasonable person in the same circumstances would have exercised, or violated a law or statute (negligence per se).

Reasonable people would agree that our actions should be tempered by considerations for the safety and well - being of others, that we are bound by a «duty of care.»

In the case of R. v. Roy, the Supreme Court of Canada found that the trial judge erred in law by inferring from the fact that Roy had committed a dangerous act while driving that his conduct displayed a marked departure from the standard of care expected of a reasonable person in the circumstances.