Obviously, taking these studies at face value, the studies involving human subjects would obviously
carry more weight compared to the studies involving rats and other animals.
Can your explain why your unsupported opinion
carries more weight compared to a few people I quoted: — the CEO of a major gas & electric utility — a geoscientist who ran the British equivalent of MIT and was later Chairman of Shell — and a Nobel physicist / Stanford professor?
Not exact matches
They would actually be
carrying just 20 pounds
more muscle than they would if they never even touched a
weight, and
compared to other advanced trainees of their heights and bone structures they would be just average.
This is related to an interesting phenomenon: if you
compare a smaller athlete to an athlete who has the same exact build but is 30 percent bigger, the bigger athlete will be only about 20 percent stronger, even though he has to
carry about 30 percent
more weight.
The diesel CX - 5
carries about 200 pounds of additional
weight compared to the gas - powered model and is characterized by heavier steering and a
more planted body.
Compared to half - tons it's not as soft as a Ram (air or steel sprung) or most F - 150s,
more like the firmness level of a GM or Tundra — and those typically
carry more weight.
The steering wheel also now
carries more weight and has greater response — yet, it's still quite soft
compared to conventionally - powered BMWs.
Keep in mind that
compared to the rest of the guinea pig, your guinea pig's legs and feet are very small to be
carrying all of that
weight and an appropriate surface will keep them much
more comfortable.
Adolescent pregnancy,
more common amongst indigenous Australians
compared with the general population,
carries increased risk of low birth
weight infants, prematurity and increased neonatal mortality.