He makes a strenuous
case against God's goodness.
With that you have
no case against God since this mutant bunch never was.
I agreed, subject to the condition that he would, in turn, read George Smith's Atheism:
The Case Against God.
As for the ideologists who claim to know the way to a perfectly just society and who «build
a case against God in defense of man, on whom can they depend when human activity proves powerless?»
Not exact matches
Theologians who have quite properly protested
against the notion that
God was such that he needed to be made friendly and available to his creatures by reason of some event (in this
case the death of Christ) which opened up for him this possibility, have failed to see that in this inadequate and often misleading way of speaking, there was an insight of which they should have taken due account.
By the word of
God we define: The Easterners can not complain
against the Patriarch to western Patriarchs; that every
case that can not be settled in his presence must await the judgement of Christ... (and) on no grounds whatever one can think or say that the Catholicos of the East can be judged by those who are below him, or by a Patriarch equal to him he himself must be the judge of all those beneath him, and he can be judged only by Christ who has chosen him, elevated him and placed him at the head of his church.
Altizer's position represents his attempt to grasp the inner logic of the Incarnation, though he is fully conscious of the fact that the profanity of contemporary culture plays an essential role in his formulation of a radically immanental interpretation of Christ.31 He presents a telling
case against attempts in Christian theology to conceive
God as an immutable Absolute wholly unaffected by the contingencies of history.
They implicitly revive the old Manicheistic error postulating the existence of two forces acting
against each other:
God and an inert matter; in this
case, chance and intelligent design.
Just another
case of man fighting
against God.
Citing examples of Christian mothers who were instrumental in the abolition of slavery and the passage of laws
against child labor, she makes a strong
case that virtues such as compassion and creativity that are «refined in the practice of motherhood can and should be used in other arenas to bring
God's love, peace, mercy and justice to the world.»
In this
case, an insult
against a religious order who are literally causing
God's people to stumble, on the part of
God incarnate, is utterly justified.
Instead, there was a pattern of ongoing, thorough - going, and persistent moral rebellion
against God that went on for years — in many
cases, for generations — in spite of repeated warnings by
God.
John, I think the best argument
against Pascal's wager is the fact that he underestimates (in the passage I quoted, actually) the cost of wagering for
God if it is the
case that
God doesn't exist.
If this had not been the
case, then there could not have been the almost constant revolts
against Rome led by messianic pretenders who began a war in the expectation that
God would end it which are a feature of the history of this period.
These considerations may be taken separately or they may be combined to make an apparently quite powerful cumulative
case against the rationality of belief in
God.
Weather you believe or not (I open my eyes every day) so it's not hard to All will stand before the lord on the day of reckoning which man will no doubtedly usher in and those who don't believe or
against god will try to wage war on the almighty to no avail, only to be left in ruins... the great Satan (adversary) will be all who oppose
god in battle, that serpent of old is still here today, we live in the middle of a brood of vipers and this website is part of the venom aimed at distorting the faithfuls belief as well as a an agonist for those who wish to continue to disbelieve... CNN is anti
god To my brothers and sisters who truly live in Christ Peace be with you and never forget your path despite the darkness that is trying to consume you, bring enough oil for your lamps to live in this darkness and bring extra in
case of a delay, he will not abandon you... we will not be forgotten Amen To those who don't, I know the myth of Santa and the easterbunny really choked up your insides to find that they were not real, but childhood is over and it was a cruel human joke designed to make it that much harder for you to believe in that which visits you and you can't see, no matter you have life so is it too much to ask for a little belief?
For all its power, however, Voltaire's poem is a very feeble thing compared to the
case for «rebellion»
against «the will of
God» in human suffering placed in the mouth of Ivan Karamazov by that fervently Christian novelist Dostoevsky; for, while the evils Ivan recounts to his brother Alexey are acts not of impersonal nature but of men, Dostoevsky's treatment of innocent suffering possesses a profundity of which Voltaire was never even remotely capable.
The where is
God question in this
case is used as an argument
against God: if he is who you say he is, why would this happen?
In this
case, furthermore, the intended violence of Christians
against other Christians and
against non-Christians is something whose «results» include the calling down of
God's wrath upon the Church, part of which may well include the secularized crucible of what was once a «Christian culture.»
This is directed
against the Gnostics who claimed that they were in the most intimate possible fellowship with
God, fellowship not even possible for the ordinary man, and who yet wallowed in sin, either on the principle that the body is evil and therefore it does not matter what is done with it or in it, or on the principle that in sin the body does no more than fulfil its own nature, and that in either
case the spirit is left quite untouched.
It is rebellion
against God; sin spelled in lower -
case letters are all the behaviors that are not in harmony with
God's will.
Certainly the loss was not intentional; it was more a matter of drifting away, or like the
case of Samson who rose from sleep to go out
against the Philistines not realizing that in the night he had been shorn of
God's strength.
You speak
against their
god (in this
case, nay - cher), and they WILL shut you up.
«Anyone who has a
case against any man of
God should swear an oath, proceed to the law court and face the rigours, rather than engage in media trial and character assassination, which have become the hallmark of this administration.»
In
case anyone was in doubt about the ire Darwin's work would arouse, the local vicar is seen telling him, «You're pitting science
against God!»
The fiery California atheist who last week lost his bid at the U.S. Supreme Court to get «under
God» stricken from the Pledge of Allegiance vows to continue the fight with new plaintiffs, preferably in
cases against school districts all over the country.
Chambers, who says Nebraska is as good a place for such a
case as any since
God is omnipresent, asked the court for a summary judgment or for an injunction
against God from engaging in the acts detailed in the suit.
As in the
case of fire insurance, a standard insurance plan would only protect your property
against disasters such as storm and tempest and, hence, you may have to opt for an add - on cover to shield your property
against an act of
God.