They already know the truth, and so view their job as making
a case against any arguments from skeptics and doubters.
Not exact matches
Rush casts its net wide; there's a macroeconomic
argument woven through the book that makes the
case against taxation structures that are redistributive to the point of dampening the urge to succeed.
Trump frequently villainized Garcia Zarate and cited Steinle's death during his presidential campaign, using the
case to bolster his
argument for a border wall and aid his crusade
against «sanctuary cities.»
The first oral
arguments in the string of lawsuits filed
against DOL's fiduciary rule were heard on Aug. 25 by Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, in the
case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
In
arguments before U.S. District Judge William Alsup, attorneys for both parties laid out their
case related to Waymo's request for a temporary injunction
against Uber that would force the ride - hailing company to stop testing its autonomous cars.
This
argument could bolster Alphabet's overall
case against Uber if the Google parent company can only prove Uber possessed Alphabet's stolen technology but abandoned it.
There are many
arguments against the special
case of 0.01 BTC since it is unlikely to represent anything meaningful as the Bitcoin economy grows (it certainly won't be the equivalent of 0.01 USD, GBP or EUR).
Let's hope that when the Supreme Court hears oral
arguments on the
case on October 2, the Justices will side with regular working people like Hobson, not with the big bosses and corporations who want to use the fine print to rig the rules
against the rest of us.
is a convincing and remarkably candid
argument that the
case for homosexual relations must be made
against Scripture and the Christian tradition.
The
argument of the complainants might not have offered the strongest
case against the incursions of the administrative state, and yet the outcome had the eerie ring of things sure to come.
Her attorney, Saif ul Malook, based the appeal on the
argument that the person who brought the
case against Bibi, a local cleric, should not have been allowed to do so since he didn't hear the blasphemy first - hand.
In the
case of Hardin's
argument, if the calculations revealed that giving aid to certain countries would result in more rather than less disease and death, it would follow then that to do so would be an offense
against love and mercy.
The Challenge of Peace, without reference to the logic of prima facie duties, replicates the structure of Childress»
argument exactly: just war theory begins with a presumption
against war, and the just war criteria function to override this presumption (or to show that it should not be overridden) in particular
cases.
It appears to me to be in any
case gratuitous to read, as Gunkel does (in an
argument against the historicity of the event), «dass Elias die 450 Propheten Baals mit eigener Hand geschlachtet habe» (Hermann Gunkel, Elias, Jahwe und Baal, Tubingen: 1906, p. 36).
This was Augustine's great
case against the Pelagians; quite naturally it became the central Reformation
argument against the compromises, the relative means and the «spiritual barter system» of the late medieval church.
Ken, none of the answers you've listed above make a strong
case for / or
against supporting the
arguments listed.
«It seems to me that there is a persuasive
case for believing that the doctrine of Humanae Vitae, regardless of the pastoral difficulty it causes, regardless of the philosophical and theological
arguments thrown
against it, regardless of the historical conditioning of its neo-scholastic framework, has been, and is being taught infallibly, that is, irreversibly and without error, by the Church's ordinary universal magisterium.»
John, I think the best
argument against Pascal's wager is the fact that he underestimates (in the passage I quoted, actually) the cost of wagering for God if it is the
case that God doesn't exist.
In any
case, the
argument against Christian majoritarianism influencing public policy rests more on respect for minority feelings than on the alleged disintegration of the majority.
In a more recent work, Reason in the Balance: The
Case Against NATURALISM in Science, Law and Education (P. 3), Johnson continues his
argument, and makes clear what was implicit in the earlier work.
This ought to be a reminder that it discloses what will always be the world's attitude to the church and what
arguments will be used to the end of history in the world's
case against it.
One of the strongest
arguments in recent years for abolishing the death penalty has arisen, not from the moral prohibition
against the taking of life, but from the fact that with rare exceptions those who are executed are people who lack the means to secure good legal assistance, or lack the educational background to make full use of such assistance, or lack the social status which brings the
case to public attention.11
You are quite right in pointing out that I not only make a strong
case against gay marriage and
against abortion but also carefully delineate the
arguments from the other side.
The where is God question in this
case is used as an
argument against God: if he is who you say he is, why would this happen?
Many of the objections put forward by pro-life agencies in Britain
against recent euthanasia Bills gave precedence to the «thin end of the wedge» type of
argument, often pointing to Holland as a worst
case example.
José Mourinho declared the
case brought
against him for alleged tax fraud to be closed after he accepted the
arguments put forward by Spain's Inland R -LRB-...)
(Simplistic
arguments against all forms of cosleeping, in this
case, do not make sense, nor are the recommendations «practical» for those for whom they are intended.)
Apart from the
argument that we have a moral duty to help those who wish to come to this country (which you may or may not accept), there is an economic
case in favour of immigration in that the economy benefits from the availability of cheap labour, and there is a
case against in that growth in population especially in the crowded South - East creates a lot of pressure on infrastructure such as housing, transport, hospitals, and schools (and the growth in population is largely due to immigration).
One prominent legal commentator has argued that the
case against the church, to force it to perform same - sex religious marriage, is «reasonable»; another has claimed that the church's
argument is hysterical.
In a celebrated
case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson,
against the strong
argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact».
Labour's
argument was rejected - or failed to get across (partly because it all seemed about # 6 billion this year)- but
against opponents who said cutting waste was important, but in David Cameron's
case that he would reject any ministerial plan to cut public services.
Should Cameron wish to make a credible
case against electoral reform, he'd better start thinking of some new
arguments.
Opening
arguments began Monday in the
case against John Haggerty, a Queens political operative and Bloomberg campaign volunteer who is accused of stealing $ 1.1 million of the mayor's money in 2009.
It is a straw man
argument, designed to over-inflate the
case against him so he can defeat it.
Sunder: In the interests of intellectual strictness I have qualified the comment about the lack of intellectual and moral
case against PR to refer specifically to the two lines of
argument featured in the post.
Closing
arguments in the
case against Mangano, wife Linda Mangano and former Oyster Bay Town Supervisor John Venditto were scheduled to continue on Thursday.
A Manhattan federal judge on Monday promised to decide by the end of August whether to let a libel suit by Sarah Palin
against The New York Times proceed after hearing 90 minutes of
arguments on the
case.
Prosecutors made their closing
arguments Monday in the public corruption
case against Sheldon Silver, the former state Assembly speaker with extremely close ties to the real estate industry.
At 2:30 p.m., oral
arguments are set to begin regarding the Trump legal team's motion to dismiss a sexual harassment
case against the president, 111 Centre St., Room 352, Manhattan.
«Based on this superior
argument, the consultant appointed by government to investigate the alleged hidden remittances was instructed to withdraw the pending court
case against some commercial entities at the federal high court, Lagos.»
Federal prosecutors, bent on telling a story of public corruption, used cherry - picked evidence, untrustworthy witnesses and innuendo to build a
case against former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and his son, Adam, lawyers for the men said in closing
arguments yesterday.
«It's just surreal,» said Jaron Benjamin a week after the conviction of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and on the day of closing
arguments in the federal corruption
case against former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, knowing that those
cases may have been bolstered by work he did years ago in the fight to strengthen the state's rent laws.
MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT — «Power, greed, corruption» are at the heart of the
case against former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, federal prosecutors said Tuesday during opening
arguments in the trial.
During closing
arguments in the corruption trial
against state Sen. Dean Skelos and his son, Adam, a lawyer for the younger Skelos told jurors that the government's
case against the former majority leader relies on burdening the jury with heaps of emails, phone calls and witness testimony to distract jurors from the lack of a supposed smoking gun.
Without indicating what action he might take in the Ivy
case, Soares insisted he was working to prevent a defense attorney from raising a potentially disastrous legal
argument against any district attorney who might bring charges in a
case that falls into what Soares characterized as the executive order's ample ambiguities.
In a 90 - minute closing
argument, Christopher P. Conniff, a defense lawyer, told jurors that the
case against State Senator Dean G. Skelos and his son, Adam, amounted to little more than distractions, snippets of conversations taken out of context, and self - serving lies from two central witnesses.
Pawa also led the plaintiffs in a 2008
case, Kivalina v. Exxon Mobil Corp., in which an Alaskan village made
arguments against Exxon similar to those that Oakland and San Francisco are making now.
So if you ever want to see if we have a problem in policing related to race, pay related to gender or a problem with violence
against transgender individuals, in all of those
cases it becomes impossible to make a scientific
argument — because if those categories are never recorded in official documents, you can never do the data collection to show what's true.
But where treatment choice is in dispute, the usual situation places CAM practitioners
against the rest of the medical personnel, in which
case they need to have a good line of
arguments and a good and widely accepted reputation.
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Chief Judge Royce Lamberth, who earlier had ruled
against the National Institutes of Health, this time came down on NIH's side in several key
arguments in the
case.