Not exact matches
Several other senior SSCS people however confirmed that the
expulsion was because of the bow and arrow, but the increasing backlash
against my treatment had made SSCS come up with a suitable guise — in this
case, it was all part of the master strategy to help with sentencing.»
The French Farmers
case supports this obliquely, but more recently, the Court has recognised that public revulsion at crimes
against children may be a legitimate factor in deciding on
expulsion of such criminals.
In particular, on the basis of the criteria laid down by the
case ‑ law of the Court of Justice, Directive 2004/38 gives Union citizens protection
against expulsion.
The likelihood of reoffending may indeed be taken into account by the court or competent authority, but in order to assess, in addition to, or weighed
against, the other conditions or criteria laid down by that directive and the
case ‑ law of the Court, whether it is actually necessary to order
expulsion.