The boldest chapter lays out «
the case against freedom.»
Not exact matches
You can go to the
Freedom From Religion Foundation website and take a bible quiz, a church state quiz, see what's going on in the court
cases against the religious.
The protest by Southern Weekly may be an unusual
case of Chinese journalists» resistance to censorship, but it isn't a new dawn for
freedom of speech or rebellion
against the party.
In each and every one of these
cases, people want us to do what the terrorists want: Firstly, by a panicked response undertaken during a highly emotional time; secondly, by turning
against one another and blaming refugees and Muslims; thirdly, by clamping down on our
freedoms, whether of movement or communication; and finally by making our foreign policy — whether it is a retreat or a doubling up — responsive to the apocalyptic hysteria of a bunch of fascists.
This is the
case against the California «top - two» system (Proposition 14), filed by the Peace &
Freedom Party, the Libertarian Party of California, and the Alameda County Green Party.
Under the heading of «wow that was fast,» I've already received a response from the Federal Trade Commission to their recent loss in a Texas Federal Court in their
case filed
against Freedom Financial Processing, Debt Professionals...
However, legitimate debt relief companies like
Freedom Debt Relief offer third party legal representation options in
case a creditor attempts to take legal action
against you.
In some
cases these groups of escaped slaves fought open wars
against colonists» forces, as is the
case with one famous instance in Florida, when a group was granted
freedom in an agreement that predates the Emancipation Proclamation.
Lord Monckton, one of the leading scientists battling
against the «settled science», has just submitted a
Freedom of Information Act request to determine how the U.K. Supreme Court has ruled to support climate change activism in specific legal
cases before it.
http://www.thenewamerican.com & go to 10 July 2012 Sustainable
Freedom: Surging Opposition to Agenda 21, «Sustainable Development» There is also an article on the new american site about the bullying EPA losing a
case, in the supreme court,
against the sackett family, but I cant put my hand on the reference.
Now, because of posts like this, I predict that you and a few dozen others will go down in scientific history on this topic, relative to defense of scientific integrity and
freedom on an issue that spent the better part of a generation devolving to the point where RICO
cases are suggested
against dissenting scientists and corporations and «skeptics» are obliquely likened to Holocaust «deniers».
In order more fully to illustrate the mischief of denying a hearing to opinions because we, in our own judgment, have condemned them, it will be desirable to fix down the discussion to a concrete
case; and I choose, by preference, the
cases which are least favorable to me — in which the argument
against freedom of opinion, both on the score of truth and on that of utility, is considered the strongest.
When, suddenly, thanks to a whistle - blower (whom the prominent Illiberals in Congress want prosecuted [thehill.com], BTW), we learn of the massive prosecutorial misconduct (some of it, such as deleting files after receiving
Freedom of Information requests, outright criminal), that affects a substantial amount of evidence
against us, we move for the «court» to dismiss the entire
case.
The
case arises in the context of a debate over the relationship between laws
against hate speech and the principles of
freedom of speech.
This judgment has also come along at a time when the European Court of Human Rights» decision is awaited in the four conjoined
cases of Ladele, Eweida, Macfarlane and Chaplin, all of which involve issues of religious
freedom and two of which involve the same potential conflict between the right not to be discriminated
against on grounds of sexual orientation and the right to religious
freedom (see our posts here, here and here).
Under our First Amendment
freedom of press jurisprudence, it is almost impossible to win a
case against a credit reporting or data broker, etc..
Since 2006 Dmitri has been representing Moscow Gay Russia Project in a number of
cases concerning
freedom of assembly, hate crimes
against lgbt people in Russia, and discrimination based on sexual orientation.
While today's decision upholds the worldwide order
against Google, it nevertheless reflects many of the
freedom of expression concerns CCLA had voiced in our interventions in this
case.
In Common Services Agency v Scottish Information Commissioner [2008] UKHL 47 the House of Lords made a groundbreaking decision in favour of the Common Services Agency (CSA) in a
case it had brought
against the Scottish information commissioner (SIC), concerning the provision of anonymised personal data in response to a
freedom of information request.
How can you ensure that those
freedoms are not stripped away without due process — without being given a fighting chance
against a faceless and uncaring government, and judges and prosecutors who treat their
cases like numbers on a conveyor belt?
If a
case comes before the Court that does deal with Convention rights, say for instance a
freedom of assembly challenge is brought
against Ealing Council's decision to ban protestors outside the Marie Stopes clinic, then, following on from the logical conclusion of this Judgment, the High Court will need to be reviewing the PSPO at a higher level of scrutiny.
Having examined the foundational weaknesses of the Bell coalition's website blocking plan (existing Canadian law, weak piracy evidence, limited impact) and its negative effects (lack of court orders, overblocking, ineffectiveness, violation of net neutrality, vulnerability on
freedom of expression grounds, higher Internet costs, privacy risks), the
case against the plan enters the final phase with several posts on how it fails to meet the requirements under the Telecommunications Act.
While FIJA does not advocate for or
against any particular
case, we bring you for informational purposes this week's
Freedom Friday video.
Hicks Morley's Dan Michaluk was quoted in the January 23, 2012 edition of Law Times magazine in an article entitled «
Case pits disclosure
against academic
freedom.»
This
case provides an important opportunity to explore how equality rights should be balanced
against religious
freedom.
The present
case concerns the balancing of IP and Copyright
against the
freedom of the press and
freedom of expression.
The
case will proceed
against Apple, Macmillan and Penguin «for conspiring to end e-book retailers»
freedom to compete on price», the Justice Department said.
«Why, Even If You Have Nothing To Hide, Government Surveillance Threatens Your
Freedom: The
Case Against Expanding Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Powers.»
The
case made it all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada and pitted Quebec's regional objective of preserving French culture
against the fundamental
freedom of expression protected by Section 2 (b) of the Charter.
In dismissing the appeal
against dismissal of an application for judicial review of the Bar Council's decision, the Court examined the relevant ECHR
case law, which emphasised adequacy of representation over
freedom of choice as to the identity of counsel.
Similarly, in the more recent
case of R. v. Badesha, the court was called upon to balance a Sikh man's claim to his religious
freedom to wear a turban
against the health and social policy concerns justifying the mandatory wearing of helmets while riding motorcycles.30
Freedom of expression is in my view a different
case: thus the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench got it right when it decided that a former pastor could speak publicly
against homosexuality, short of inciting violence.