These statements appeared to support
the case against the teacher.
In «Class Warfare» lawyer Steven Brill demonstrates his litigation skills as he lays out
his case against teachers» unions and the so - called anti-reformers.
Not exact matches
Mantel's memoir, like the novels, is thick with smoldering grievances:
against teachers («I don't know if there is a
case on record of a child of seven murdering a schoolteacher, but I think there ought to be»); adults generally («In Hadfield, as everywhere in history of the world, violence without justification or apology was meted out by big people to small»); and above all,
against the Catholic Church, which stood in judgment on her mother when Mantel was a child.
Sometimes, as in the
case of a fisher caste in South India, they asked for Christian
teachers as a means of obtaining the protection of the European
against some hereditary foe.
And on June 21, 2002, the New York Times, in «Silently Shifting
Teachers in Sex Abuse Cases,» noted a study of 225 complaints against teachers from 1990 — 94 and found that in only one percent of the cases did superintendents follow up to ensure that molesting teachers didn't continue teaching, while at least 16 percent of the teachers were able to get new teachi
Teachers in Sex Abuse
Cases,» noted a study of 225 complaints against teachers from 1990 — 94 and found that in only one percent of the cases did superintendents follow up to ensure that molesting teachers didn't continue teaching, while at least 16 percent of the teachers were able to get new teaching
Cases,» noted a study of 225 complaints
against teachers from 1990 — 94 and found that in only one percent of the cases did superintendents follow up to ensure that molesting teachers didn't continue teaching, while at least 16 percent of the teachers were able to get new teachi
teachers from 1990 — 94 and found that in only one percent of the
cases did superintendents follow up to ensure that molesting teachers didn't continue teaching, while at least 16 percent of the teachers were able to get new teaching
cases did superintendents follow up to ensure that molesting
teachers didn't continue teaching, while at least 16 percent of the teachers were able to get new teachi
teachers didn't continue teaching, while at least 16 percent of the
teachers were able to get new teachi
teachers were able to get new teaching jobs.
Not many of the
cases have held
against street preachers or
against Christian preaching being classified as hate speech... but the very fact that these
cases are being brought and that there are real
cases of
teachers being sacked or from the health service... I think it is under threat, yes.»
JOLIET — After dozens of students and
teachers were sickened by a contaminated school lunch two years ago, the Will County state's attorney made headlines by charging two state education employees with reckless conduct, apparently the first criminal charges
against government employees in a food - poisoning
case.
In papers submitted by the UK Government last year in the
case and seen by the BHA, the Government attempted to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a
teacher brought a claim
against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated
against them in their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider context.
«Allegations kept on file even when there is no
case against the individual means that these
teachers remain under a veil of suspicion throughout the entirety of their working lives.
Education reform groups like StudentsFirstNY and the New
Teacher Project say a lawsuit
against New York State inspired by the Vergara
case could change local tenure laws and present a long - awaited opportunity to legally assess long - term sticking points with the unions, such as merit pay and seniority rules.
Finally, the Brooklyn - bred Democrat pointed to
cases in which Gorsuch had ruled
against individuals who had sued employers for firing them, including a
teacher suffering from cancer and a truck driver who abandoned his load in a winter storm after his brakes failed.
You helped us fight back
against teacher layoffs and severe cutbacks, and you helped us make the
case that it's time that millionaires pay their fair share of taxes.
But it should no longer be the
case that only the lucky students get to learn in schools where
teachers have decided to work
against standard expectations.
Although many parents and politicians argue passionately
against mobile classrooms — the majority of which never move —
teachers across the country seem much less perturbed by their use, and in many
cases, actually prefer them.
While it's hard to make the
case for licensure when it requires only taking a collection of courses, it's even harder to argue
against a standards - based licensure system that ensures that every child will have a well - trained, high - quality
teacher.
In this
case, a story about a 25 - year veteran
teacher's admirable efforts to teach his U.S. History AP students about the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is littered with pat phrases intended to score points
against education reformers.
The
cases against Lindsey Clark, Monzoor Hussain, Hardeep Saini, Arshad Hussain and Razwan Faraz — who were former principals and senior
teachers at schools in Park View Academy Trust — have therefore been dropped.
A federal judge is questioning whether a new exam for aspiring
teachers in New York is discriminatory
against minorities, a
case that could derail the state's efforts to create a more rigorous set of tests for entry into the profession.
Likewise, Peterson overstates the
case against collective bargaining for
teachers.
In making the
case against further
teacher union endorsements of Clinton, the blog Defend Public Education meticulously chronicled Broad's relationship with the candidate, going back to a visit Broad made in 1983 to the Arkansas home of Clinton and her husband, then - Gov.
More on the federal suit filed
against Connecticut, backed by Students Matter, the California - based group that recently challenged
teacher tenure in the Vergara vs. California
case.
The Wright v. New York
case was first filed in 2014, when nine families from across the state brought suit
against the State of New York and others, claiming that
teacher tenure, dismissal, and quality - blind layoff laws deprive New York children of their right to a sound basic education as guaranteed under the New York State Constitution.
A
case concerning a complaint
against a
teacher shall be reviewed and a final order entered by a panel composed of five commission members, at least one of whom must be a parent or a sworn law enforcement officer and at least three of whom must be
teachers.
A Mullica Township
case landed somewhere in between, where district brought up charges
against a kindergarten
teacher in whose class a boy and girl snuck off into the bathroom unsupervised, where there was possibly physical contact.
The
case, brought forward two years ago by Silicon Valley entrepreneur and education activist Dave Welsh, challenged the court to weigh
teacher job protections
against a student's constitutional right to equal access to a quality education.
«If you have a school that's struggling, in most
cases, the parents, the district and the
teachers are working really hard to try and fix it,» said Kathleen Oropeza, a Florida mom who co-founded the nonprofit FundEducationNow.org and fought
against parent trigger bills the past two legislative sessions.
And, in many
cases, these changes are happening
against a backdrop of furious debate about the specific statistical methods being used to determine each
teacher's effectiveness.
The
case has been brought by nine students
against the state, with the California
Teachers Association and the California Federation of
Teachers joining the defense.
As Elias is making the state's
case against the lower court ruling, he points to the high
teacher attrition rate, saying California loses 22 percent of the workforce in the first four years of teaching.
1912: NEA endorses Women's Suffrage 1919: NEA members in New Jersey lead the way to the nation's first state pension; by 1945, every state had a pension plan in effect 1941: NEA successfully lobbied Congress for special funding for public schools near military bases 1945: NEA lobbied for the G.I. Bill of Rights to help returning soldiers continue their education 1958: NEA helps gain passage of the National Defense Education Act 1964: NEA lobbies to pass the Civil Rights Act 1968: NEA leads an effort to establish the Bilingual Education Act 1974: NEA backs a
case heard before the U.S. Supreme Court that proposes to make unlawful the firing of pregnant
teachers or forced maternity leave 1984: NEA fights for and wins passage of a federal retirement equity law that provides the means to end sex discrimination
against women in retirement funds 2000s: NEA has lobbied for changes to the No Child Left Behind Act 2009: NEA delegates to the Representative Assembly pass a resolution that opposes the discriminatory treatment of same - sex couple
(1) The Vergara Decision: This
case pits nine Oakland public school students
against the State of California, arguing that (a) granting tenure after less than two years, (b) retaining
teachers during layoffs based on seniority instead of merit, and (c) the near impossibility of dismissing incompetent
teachers, is harming California's overall system of public education, and is disproportionately harming public education in low income communities.
Lefkowitz, the attorney who will be leading the New York
case, has successfully litigated other
cases that pitted him
against teachers unions.
The
case was brought
against the state by six
teachers and the N.C. Association of Educators.
During our follow - up conversations with districts, we found
cases where
teacher recommendations are biased
against high - achieving minority students; we also found
cases where
teacher recommendations are advancing minority students who do not test well on standardized tests.
But on Sunday, in a resolution committing to fighting attacks
against teachers, the union did debate demanding Duncan's resignation, ultimately settling on cheeky language that mirrored the Vergara
case.
The district fared no better in its
case against elementary school special education
teacher Gloria Hsi, despite allegations that included poor judgment, failing to report child abuse, yelling at and insulting children, planning lessons inadequately and failing to supervise her class.
District officials thought they had a strong
case against fourth - grade
teacher Shirley Loftis, including complaints and other evidence they said dated back a decade.
A small group of
teachers picketed a screening at Oakland's Piedmont Theater, distributing fliers defending unions and tenure rights and making the
case against charter schools and standardized tests.
In the meantime, nearly 30
cases have already been decided by the arbitration system set up by the law, the latest coming down this week
against a Cumberland County vocational high school
teacher accused of shoving a student.
A Supreme Court
case from this past spring that many of our members may have heard about in the national press, Friedrichs v. California
Teachers Association, would likely have been decided
against unions had Justice Antonin Scalia not died unexpectedly.
In May 2015, the online article, The
Case Against Standardized Testing — Harvard Political (harvardpolitics.com/united-states/
case-standardized-testing/) explained, again, how standardized testing focus negatively impacted curriculum and student learning as well as how it compromised
teacher evaluations.
This article explores the
case of the Winston Society, a wikispace launched by high school English
teacher Ed Cator (a pseudonym) to provide
teachers with their own space to share teaching ideas, construct knowledge collaboratively, and work
against NCLB (the No Child Left Behind Act) and related educational policies.
They're graciously taking on the
case pro bono, but it's mutually beneficial — because California's Parent Trigger law is at the forefront of an ed - reform battle raging hotly across America, pitting charter operators and radical reformers
against powerful
teachers unions.
NYC
teachers have been warned
against sharing their professional analyses of the educational appropriateness of state tests and former Chancellor Farina told parents at a private meeting in District 15 that she herself would in fact opt out in certain
cases yet declined to share this with all NYC parents, despite D15 parents» strong urging that she do so.
(2010); The New
Teacher Project, The
Case Against Quality - Blind
Teacher Layoffs (2011); Boyd, Donald; Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; and Wyckoff, James, «
Teacher Layoffs: An Empirical Illustration of Seniority v. Measures of Effectiveness» The Urban Institute, CALDER (2010); Goldhaber, Dan and Theobold, Roddy, «Assessing the Determinants and Implications of
Teacher Layoffs.»
The principal had repeatedly flaunted
teachers» Weingarten rights and Martin was instrumental in convincing a
teacher that I originally represented to testify in an unfair labor practice, ULP,
case against the principal.
Through their accounts, Rizga makes a strong
case against test scores as a way to monitor individual learning and for
teachers being in charge of school reform and accountability.
The
case against the regulator Ofqual and exam boards AQA and Edexcel had been brought by a total of 167 individual pupils, supported by 150 schools and 42 councils, plus six professional bodies, including
teachers» unions.
If you haven't been following this
case, it is
against a notorious author / box set promoter / marketer /» mastermind»
teacher who goes by the name of Rebecca Hamilton — and also runs other author businesses like OTOH Books (formerly GenreCrave).
If we dismiss the absurd stuff in the dubious last - minute document about getting
teachers to stop teaching science, the shock - horror bit seems to be that people who disagree with the AGW hypothesis gave money to an organisation which makes the
case against it.