Sentences with phrase «case against them should»

Other robot makers embraced the innovations of their end - users, though they, too, have a case against them should they choose to pursue it.

Lawyers for Michigan's governor argue that the cases against him should be dismissed.

In other words, JMAR claims that the case against them should be immediately dismissed because Loper settled with Snyder, and JMAR is indemnified from the suit by Snyder.

Histed said the case against him should be tossed due to the perception of bias.

Not exact matches

Bergdahl's defense team filed a last - minute motion on Oct. 23 to completely dismiss the case against him, citing past statements in which Trump had referred to the sergeant as «a no - good traitor who should have been executed» during his presidential campaign.

But the Republican candidate has a potential ace up his sleeve when it comes to making a case against the New York Times should he decide to do that.

The employer should make sure that they have a legitimate case against the employee in this instance because many situations are covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and other laws that protect employees.

Kelly and Case both agree that we should be designing for the centaur which is really about our brains working together with, not against silicon brains.

Keep a record of all acts of bullying so you have a case, should human resources look at disciplinary action against that employee.

In such cases, the C - corporation seller should be prepared to sign legal documents that will indemnify the buyer against a range of liabilities.

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)- A lawsuit filed by drivers against ride service Uber should not proceed as a class action, the company argued in a court filing on Thursday, citing written statements of support from hundreds of other Uber drivers in a case that could decide whether they are independent contractors or employees.

When the case goes against him and his supporters, they should have to pay court costs, lost time to JPL / NASA staff dealing with case, etc..

Her attorney, Saif ul Malook, based the appeal on the argument that the person who brought the case against Bibi, a local cleric, should not have been allowed to do so since he didn't hear the blasphemy first - hand.

The judge should be dismissed from the bench and the case should be relooked at since the judge acted with prejudice against the victim.

But you can always make a case that every person has the potential to make society better or more advanced and bringing harm to another human being should be against the law.

All biblical instructions, case studies, or personal deliberations, should be bumped against the greatest commandment before you act.

That this is the case should be gratifying to the Western liberal democracies who, for half a century, stood firm against the manifold onslaughts of those who sought to snuff out the flame of liberty.

The Challenge of Peace, without reference to the logic of prima facie duties, replicates the structure of Childress» argument exactly: just war theory begins with a presumption against war, and the just war criteria function to override this presumption (or to show that it should not be overridden) in particular cases.

Theologians who have quite properly protested against the notion that God was such that he needed to be made friendly and available to his creatures by reason of some event (in this case the death of Christ) which opened up for him this possibility, have failed to see that in this inadequate and often misleading way of speaking, there was an insight of which they should have taken due account.

Although the judge's decision did not deal with whether or not the sexual abuse actually happened, this latest turn of events is something of a victory for SGM, whose legal strategy has been to first argue that the First Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitations.

We should remind our professors and students of the atheist Rousseau's powerful case against the prejudices of enlightenment.

As we learned during our series on abuse in the church, cases of fabricated allegations of child abuse are quite rare, so when this many consistent counts are leveled against an organization, we should be wary of jumping to the defense of the accused and treating the alleged victims as liars.

«Both the statute and case law surrounding private prosecutions are adamant that courts must protect the right of access to these private prosecutions, by not assessing punitive costs against the person seeking justice - unless the case is frivolous, and never should have been brought.

The point is illustrated by the logic which the National Academy of Sciences employed to persuade the Supreme Court that «creation - scientists» should not be given an opportunity to present their case against the theory of evolution in science classes.

Citing examples of Christian mothers who were instrumental in the abolition of slavery and the passage of laws against child labor, she makes a strong case that virtues such as compassion and creativity that are «refined in the practice of motherhood can and should be used in other arenas to bring God's love, peace, mercy and justice to the world.»

They should not only apply to state - citizen, but also to citizen - citizen relationships In the case of information provision there should be protection against information oligopolies organized by fellow - citizens.

While John Locke's admonition against the «blind precipitancy» of passion should always guide the serious philosopher, an excess of zeal may well be forgiven when it involves the kind of innocent fallout that inevitably accompanies genius — as is the case with Karl Popper.

Against the Mental Capacity Bill, for example, a powerful case was put forward arguing that respect for the will of the patient was being legally and morally undermined - but not why the individual's will is relevant, let alone why it should be inviolable.

In the case of christians, it is them using their belief to justify hate against gays; oppression of women (ie; telling them what they should and shouldn't do with their bodies; basically anything that steps on a persons equal rights within a free country.

In the case of complaints against the actions of a RA - Cert client, the complainant should first attempt to resolve the issue directly with the client prior to requesting that RA - Cert become involved.

If I'm not wrong, in case we don't win against Jazz we coulg get also 20th pick (also luck should strike us).

And in both cases, while pushing back against the idea that the new team should be considered Chivas 2.0, the only story they could tell was how they were drawn to the new club via their earlier ties to Chivas.

There's obvious deficiencies in our squad but injuries also factor into the case against wenger as well, they're not a valid excuse anymore because he should have resolved that problem years ago.

Injuries are of major concern but more importantly when the game is not going how you expect you don't leave it till the final ten minutes to change the dynamic, and you don't field your best 11 against the lesser teams (unless you don't trust the players on the bench, in which case you should sell them) sometimes I wish he was as brave as mourinho who is not afraid to take a player off at half time if he thinks it provides him with a better chance of winning.

If that's the case, we should be seeing this against City Welbeck Cazorla Ozil Sanchez Flamini Ramsey

I would not even dwell on age, because we can even look at a recent case, a certain Zlatan which many wanted here, we should not have nothing against a RVP return, because that would just be plain stupid

In any case we do always seem to make it more difficult than it should be and when this occurs we provide stellar performances, previous bayern games, our monaco game away from home, coming back from 2 - 0 down against hull idk but to me it shows a lack of preparation / concentration for the big occasions.

Former USC assistant Todd McNair's defamation lawsuit against the NCAA should provide a wealth of illuminating details about the controversial Reggie Bush case.

What we can and should continue to do is make our cases for and against serious candidates with as many facts as we can muster.

The problem for Wenger is that he may not know if any retrospective action will take place until after the game against BATE, so should we start with Alexis anyway just in case?

I agree this should be easy, but we thought that would be the case against Burnley as well!

Expect to see a fairly strong lineup from Leeds in the match, as Thomas Christiansen is looking for players to step up and make the case that the should be included in the starting XI against Bolton.

Against the average teams in the league, Blackburn have been clinical at home and it should be a case of the same as they travel back to Lancashire to face Stoke City.

Let's hope our Premier League status is already safe at that time but, in case we are still in a fight for survival, an away game at Southampton and the final game — at home against promoted Burnley — should give us a chance if we need one.

In most cases, children shouldn't be forced into attending weight loss camp against their will, as their own motivating factors are essential to being successful in the long - term.

An attorney should be able to offer advice beginning in the investigation period, and then throughout any cases if charges are filed against your tween or teen.

I know that in most cases such confrontations shouldn't be necessary and mothers should find ways to work with the hospital staff, not against them.

Moreover, each and every member of Congress should be notified that he or she is personally liable (can be sued) for his or her own failure, or the same in conspiracy with other members, to perform what is a ministerial and constitutional duty, that is, to require and / or insist that Presidential electoral votes only be counted for candidates who are «natural born citizens» under Article II of the United States Constitution, the failure of which creates a cause of action for deprivation of claimants» constitutional rights (as allowed under the Bivens case) against employees of the Federal Government, in this case, to a lawful President and Commander in Chief, and therefore, for deprivation of adequate continuation of the United States as a Constitutional Republic.

All of these cases, statutes, and principles taken together should indicate the virtual impossibility in pursuing a claim against the government in this case.

Should Cameron wish to make a credible case against electoral reform, he'd better start thinking of some new arguments.