Sentences with phrase «case at oral argument»

Not exact matches

At the Center for Law and Religion Forum, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I have recorded a podcast on last week's oral argument in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, the Contraception Mandate case.

Next Monday, March 24 — the day before oral arguments in the Hobby Lobby andConestoga Wood Products cases — the Religious Freedom Project at Georgetown University's Berkley Center will host an event, «Everybody's Business: The Legal, Economic, and Political Implications of....

Also at 9 a.m., parents and students from Middle Village Preparatory Charter School in Queens rally outside the Queens County Courthouse before oral arguments are heard in its case, 88 - 11 Sutphin Blvd., Queens.

At 2:30 p.m., oral arguments are set to begin regarding the Trump legal team's motion to dismiss a sexual harassment case against the president, 111 Centre St., Room 352, Manhattan.

Both agencies acted with official city and state misconduct, and in both cases, honest, credible evidence was repeatedly dismissed and ignored, and so was the corruption that remains to date — where knowingly false statements were made to discredit me (then later completely reversed during oral argument by my accusers), and both the DOI investigators (who appeared at my doorstep many times to collect evidence) and MTA Office of the Inspector General investigators invited me back to their headquarters (more than six times), from 1989 to 2008), and continued to take no action to restore and reinstate my city job, pension and social security contributions.

At 10 a.m., a Long Island man seeking exoneration after he pleaded guilty as an 18 - year - old in 1988 to sexually abusing boys and served 13 years in prison, Jesse Friedman, attends oral arguments in a state appeals court hearing seeking Nassau County DA and police files in the case; 45 Monroe Pl., Brooklyn.

At the end of the oral arguments, Fisher asked the plaintiffs to submit further written arguments concerning whether they have standing in the case, and on the «political question» — presumably, whether or not this is a matter to be decided by the courts or political system.

The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in a Rhode Island case that tests the constitutionality of prayers at public school graduation ceremonies.

Oral arguments in Schwartz v. Lopez, the Carson City case, begin at 10 a.m. at the Regional Justice Center, 200 Lewis Ave., in downtown Las Vegas.

At oral argument, plaintiffs described this case as part of a series of cases intended to move the entire industry... more and more to zero revenue sharing, based on the notion that zero revenue sharing is much less expensive for plans and for participants.

Virginia Rutledge, counsel for The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (which filed a friend of the court brief in the case), told A.i.A., «The outcome can't be predicted based on questions raised during oral argument, but the Court has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use of Cariou's imagery and the significance of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive of allegations of market harm.»

We are experienced at briefing and oral argument before the Supreme Court on the merits of cases, and also at the certiorari stage.

Second is today's oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, which «concerns the torture of Ogoni leaders in Nigeria, but at stake is the future of the law under which this case was brought, the Alien Tort Statute.»

Typical practice is to release transcripts the day of argument and audio the Friday after oral argument, Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Jonathan Adler noted at the Volokh Conspiracy.

The weekly posts here offer an insider's perspective on oral arguments in major cases at the federal appellate level and news stories about sitting Supreme Court justices.

You'll see what's compelling at oral argument and in briefs, and you'll get a chance to peek behind the scenes and see how judges actually decide cases.

He notes that at the oral argument of the case, one of the plaintiffs» lawyers proudly described himself as a «bounty hunter,» to which the court in its opinion remarked, «We will have more to say about exactly who Proposition 65 was created for later, but it wasn't bounty hunters.»

I had the strong impression at oral argument that the panel had not understood (or perhaps even read) the briefs we or the government had submitted, and was in any event not particularly interested in the real issues in the case.

He lamented that at oral argument, lawyers tend to focus too much on the case law.

It was Alito's first written opinion this term, Kimberly Atkins at DC Dicta notes, adding, «The decision was not entirely surprising, given the comments from the justices during oral arguments in the case.»

When longtime courtroom sketch artist William J. Hennessy Jr. showed up last week at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, supplies in hand, to capture oral arguments in a high - profile Guantanamo detainee case, the court's chief deputy clerk stopped him short.

Although none of the 2006 term's blockbuster opinions may emerge from the Court's very first oral argument session, it does appear that the 9th Circuit is well on its way to being reversed in at least three of the four cases to be argued in October.

Essentially, the financial backing that Michael Ketchmark uses to invest in this area means that the personal injury lawyers at Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. can pay ordinary people to sit through oral arguments and case evidence put together by the personal injury lawyers at Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. in a mock trial situation so that the lawyers can study the effects and possible outcomes of their cases before filing the claims for real.

Shullman analyzed oral arguments in ten cases at the United States Supreme Court, noting each question asked by the Justices and assigning a score from one to five to each depending on how helpful or hostile she considered the question to be.

Yet another issue will be on display during oral arguments at the Supreme Court next week: whether indigent defendants in capital cases must prove they need more experienced lawyers and resources before they will be provided.

At the oral argument before this Court, when respondents» counsel was asked whether «this is just a purely Title VII case as it comes to us from the Court of Appeals without any constitutional overtones,» counsel responded:

And this morning at «The Volokh Conspiracy,» Orin Kerr has a post titled «An Analysis of United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing» that begins, «On December 18th, the en banc 9th Circuit will hear oral argument on an important case involving how the Fourth Amendment applies to the search and seizure of computers.»

There is little case law on the requirements of Rule of Civil Procedure 41.1 as it regards sealing the record, and it appears the Court of Appeals raised this issue on its own at oral argument.

Barry «is a very active judge at oral argument, which is usually a sign a judge has already read the briefs and is very actively thinking about the case,» said David Fine, an appellate lawyer based in Harrisburg, Pa. «She is very polite in questioning and at the same time also direct.»

The BIICL paper submitted that «a carefully drafted written submission can, when skilfully used at the oral hearing, enhance the impact of argument... the use of a skeleton argument allows the advocate two shots at persuading the court of his case».

Carolyn Elefant stated, «[I'm excited about] new legal research products like CaseText's CARA that take a new approach to legal research — I can't wait to have it scrape the cases from a brief so I can have them all at my fingertips at oral argument.»

As detailed in this post at SCOTUSblog, on Tuesday morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. O'Brien and Burgess, a combined pair of cases concerning the application of the machine - gun mandatory minimum sentencing enhancement of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c).

While today you don't have to travel hundreds of miles by dogsled to hear cases as your predecessor judges based in Alaska once did, you probably now have the most grueling commute of any federal appellate judge to arrive at the locations where your court regularly hears oral arguments.