The case discussed in this post is a particularly clear example of case where Jeffreys» prior makes no sense at all.
(Please note
the case discussed in this post was overturned by the BC Court of Appeal in reasons for judgment released on September 21, 2010.
Not exact matches
In my second post for Terrain, I discuss how growing your own food can actually help you check off that New Year's resolution to get healthier (here's the first post in case you missed it
In my second
post for Terrain, I
discuss how growing your own food can actually help you check off that New Year's resolution to get healthier (here's the first
post in case you missed it
in case you missed it).
But if districts are able to combine their considerable purchasing power, as is the
case with the Urban School Food Alliance (
discussed in past TLT
posts linked below), we may start to see more «real food» offerings like Back to the Roots cereal on kids» trays.
After collecting and analysing almost 6oo, ooo tweets through VOICES from the Blogs
posted in the three weeks leading up to polling day, which
discussed the primary election, we can confidently say that this was not the
case.
In this
case I wanted to
discuss my
post on Bad Dates and Your Dating Mind - set.
In case you missed it, our NY State Director Andrea Rogers had a piece in the New York Post also discussing the Brown v. New York lawsuit, sayin
In case you missed it, our NY State Director Andrea Rogers had a piece
in the New York Post also discussing the Brown v. New York lawsuit, sayin
in the New York
Post also
discussing the Brown v. New York lawsuit, saying:
The first
case study looks at KIPP LA Prep,
discussed in yesterday's
post as one of the best charter schools
in Los Angeles, against it's neighborhood middle school, Hollenbeck.
I wrote a more detailed
post as to why I think this is the
case... I think there is a link
in the article to a
post I did
in April that
discusses more of Markel's advantages (
in my opinion).
Your
post discusses the proposed correction to the Times Atlas that has resulted from the actions of the international glaciological research community — which you correctly applaud and hold up as a model for all scientists — «Of course, many scientists can do more, and we encourage all of our colleagues to speak publically about their research and, as the international glaciological research community did
in this
case, to try to correct misconceptions.»
A CA reader sent me the following interesting
case US v Frank Quattrone — which I'll try to
discuss in a separate
post.
Personally I think that recent research (including several studies
discussed in the above
post, published after the IPCC AR5 cutoff date) make a strong
case that internal variability (ocean cycles) are responsible for more of the slowdown
in surface warming than changes
in external forcings, but there's not a consensus about that yet.
Blog
posts discuss recent criminal
cases in Wisconsin; news involving the Wisconsin courts; and advice for people
in the Wisconsin court system.
Posts discuss cases dealing with the purchase, possession, import, export and smuggling of cultural artifacts, both
in the United States and internationally.
The following
post discusses whether the judgment delivered by the Grand Chamber of the Court
in this
case has been successful
in finally bringing the above - mentioned dispute to an end, and it also provides a closer look on the Court's reasoning as regards the choice of legal basis
in relation to the measures implementing association agreements.
Via Law and Magic I found this
post on Deceptology
discussing the
case of Gunderson v. County of San Diego,
in which the injured passenger received a $ 1.6 million settlement from the county, as well as the county's agreement to make extensive changes to the road to help keep future motorists from driving off the embankment.
As will be
discussed in this
post, the CJEU did not quite go as far as to accept that obesity is a disability, but it did recognise that,
in some
cases, differential treatment on the basis of obesity can amount to disability discrimination.
In that case, the workers criticized their supervisor in a series of Facebook posts and discussed bringing a book on worker's rights to the stor
In that
case, the workers criticized their supervisor
in a series of Facebook posts and discussed bringing a book on worker's rights to the stor
in a series of Facebook
posts and
discussed bringing a book on worker's rights to the store.
While this blog
post is an overview of the story, at best, a Pa personal injury lawyer would be able to
discuss the deeper issues and potential recovery
in a
case like this.
This next
case so shows, and it a nice compliment to Peak - Las Positas Partners v. Bollag, 172 Cal.App.4 th 101 (2009)[
discussed in our March 16, 2009
post][aggressive / tenacious litigation is a proper 1717 factor to weight
in the decision making process].
I write this second blog
post discussing Bullock because I think the
case will prove especially noteworthy for those who deal with the concept of «recklessness»
in their civil practice.
Supreme Court Dec. 29, 2016)-- 4 - 3 decision, majority opinion by Justice Cuellar and dissent by Justice Werdegar;
discussed in our Dec. 29, 2016
post: Attorney - client privilege does not categorically shield from California Public Records Act disclosure billing invoices sent by clients
in concluded, non-active
cases because legal consultation was not the purpose of the invoices; however, the privilege did protect billing invoice entries
in active, pending
cases.
-- authored by Circuit Judge Hurwitz [majority decision] and concurring opinion by Circuit Judge Reinhardt;
discussed in our Oct. 10, 2015
post: District court
in Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act
case which substantially reduced fee request was reversed based upon its reliance on inapt practice area hourly rates, upon its discounts for plaintiff's attorneys not delegating tasks to associates given that only small firms prosecuted these type of
cases, and upon its use of stale prior fee awards involving fee claimant's attorneys.
In a subsequent
post (probably the very next one) I'll also report on the standard - essential patent
case that was
discussed, for a second time, on Friday.
Posts discuss criminal
cases in Arizona, the Ninth Circuit and more broadly around the country, especially SCOTUS decisions.
In this post, international commercial litigator Steven Loble discusses recent case, Singularis Holdings Ltd. v PricewaterhouseCoopers, in which the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which is the ultimate court of appeal for UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies, and for some Commonwealth countries, set out the limits of a court's power to assist in obtaining evidence.
In this
post, international commercial litigator Steven Loble
discusses recent
case, Singularis Holdings Ltd. v PricewaterhouseCoopers,
in which the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which is the ultimate court of appeal for UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies, and for some Commonwealth countries, set out the limits of a court's power to assist in obtaining evidence.
in which the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which is the ultimate court of appeal for UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies, and for some Commonwealth countries, set out the limits of a court's power to assist
in obtaining evidence.
in obtaining evidence...
In either
case, if you have any questions or concerns about
posting a bond for you or a loved one, contact Haddad Law Firm today to
discuss your options!
After the judge admonished jurors not to
discuss the
case verbally or
in writing, Wilson
posted an entry on his blog about the
case.
Case teams should be realistic about what they need to accomplish and use the information
discussed in this
post to guide them.
Also, coverage of the much -
discussed Hudson v. Michigan knock and announce rule
case and a round - up of law school
posts in honor of Fathers» Day acheiving work - life balance.
Or at least that's what I wrote
in a
post last summer that
discussed several products that could do things such as help you predict how a particular judge might rule on an issue or which
cases that judge was likely to find most persuasive.
Postings discuss current
cases and administrative guidance as well as economic and tax issues
in the news.
In this post, I'll expand on those ideas and discuss additional techniques for effective attorney - client communication when facing setbacks in a cas
In this
post, I'll expand on those ideas and
discuss additional techniques for effective attorney - client communication when facing setbacks
in a cas
in a
case.
In future
posts we'll
discuss how you can really utilize all of Evernote's features to thoroughly organize your
cases and notes, but for now a good place to start would be by simply downloading and installing Evernote to your computer, smartphone and tablets.
Not surprisingly, the very first comment his
post received was from someone who perhaps remembered Flea's fate: «I know you feel the need to vent but for your own sake, stop here and do not
discuss this
case in public.»
In this
post, Nathan Cambien
discusses extensively new
case law by the CJEU on the topic of what actually constitutes «sufficient «movement for EU citizens to be able to invoke e.g. the right to be joined or accompanied by close family members.
That
case has been running ahead of the San Bernardino
case I
discussed in my last
post titled Apple v. FBI: The Court Record So Far dated February 26, 2016.
As
discussed in some prior
posts (here and here and here), there might be a pattern of leniency
in some white - collar
cases after Booker (which might
in turn reflect a perception that the federal guidelines are too tough on white - collar offenders).
Over at SCOTUSblog, Lyle Denniston has this fascinating
post discussing legal developments
in the
case of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person charged
in the United States with a crime for a role
in the September 11 terrorist attacks.
I have written extensively about what an injury
case is worth
in Georgia, but this
post will
discuss soft tissue injuries specifically.
Another
case which has recently been settled without being resolved on the merits (Waldman v. Thompson Reuteurs Canada Ltd. —
discussed in my blog
post here) raised the issue of whether the open courts principle effectively creates an implied public licence to use any materials submitted to the courts as part of court proceedings.
In short, this case scares me in a much more personal way than prior discussed in my prior CFAA post
In short, this
case scares me
in a much more personal way than prior discussed in my prior CFAA post
in a much more personal way than prior
discussed in my prior CFAA post
in my prior CFAA
posts.
Most of my
posts will
discuss issues related to my primary work representing clients
in personal injury, workers» compensation, defective product and small business
cases.
(UPDATE June 28, 2012 — the
case discussed in the below
post was reversed by the BC Court of Appeal
in reasons for judgement released today; you can click here to read the Court of Appeal's reasons)
There have been numerous
posts on SLAW
discussing SharePoint;
in addition, Microsoft has an industry page for law firms that provides some useful links to
case studies.
In yesterday's blog post, we discussed why the estate of Taylor Meyer might be able to prevail in its wrongful death claim, or at least why the case might be able to reach a favorable settlemen
In yesterday's blog
post, we
discussed why the estate of Taylor Meyer might be able to prevail
in its wrongful death claim, or at least why the case might be able to reach a favorable settlemen
in its wrongful death claim, or at least why the
case might be able to reach a favorable settlement.
This will not be our typical
post where we
discuss and analyze pain and suffering verdicts
in personal injury
cases; instead,
in the long line of blawg review hosts before us, we have been asked by the good folks at Blawg Review, to review what some of the best law... Continue Reading
In case that you have no experience and is unfamiliar with the claim process, you can definitely take professional help from any insurance lawyer.
In our previous
post we
discuss «how self - driving car lowers the auto insurance rates ``.
h)
Post material that advocates illegal activity or
discusses illegal activities with the intent to commit them (
in either
case as determined by How - To Geek
in its sole discretion);
You can also find people
discussing cases and
posting photos of them
in various forums around the web.