Sentences with phrase «case following an application»

Not exact matches

Still, the case against teleological ethics may here offer this response: Granting the difference between direct and indirect applications, this yields only the familiar distinction between «act - teleology» and «rule - teleology, «3 is problematic for the following reason: Social practices or patterns of social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to produce.

The conference arrangement provided a scientific basis, followed by case studies and applications in the field, an intensive day of current research and extension activities.

I didn't realize that with the zero income that the district is required to follow up on that (in the case of your district, means sending a new application), because of the logic that it is impossible to live with no income at all, so... thus... zero income wouldn't be a permanent status.

Haggerty's attorney, Paul Shechtman, filed a stay application on his client's behalf following Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman's decision last month that the high court will take up his case.

Among the allegations Mr. Amidu has put out concerning the judgement debt saga, as he filed a successful application at the Supreme Court to examine Mr. Woyome following the AG, Marietta Brew Appiah - Oppong's, discontinuation of the case, he said the AG withdrew her application to examine Mr. Woyome because President Mahama personally gave an order.

Following an application by Metuh, the judge had since October 3, 2017 signed the subpoena summoning Jonathan to appear as a defence witness in the case.

For example, in a grant application which requires an Abstract, Specific Aims, Background, Progress Report — or Preliminary Studies in the case of an initial application — Research Design and Methods, and Literature Cited, it would be wise to outline the sections in the following order: Progress Report / Preliminary Studies, Specific Aims, Research Design and Methods, Background, and Literature Cited.

Designation as an Advanced Comprehensive Stroke Center follows a rigorous application process that includes volume of cases, advanced imaging and care capabilities, around - the - clock availability of specialized treatments, dedicated neuro - intensive care beds for complex stroke patients, post-hospital coordination, participation in research, and staff with all necessary education and skills to care for the most complex stroke patients.

They presented a case of multi-day application of rTMS to visual cortex and demonstrated that rTMS provided a valuable therapeutic intervention in modulating visual hallucinations following occipital damage.

INDIANAPOLIS — The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice released the following statement in response to a ruling this afternoon by Eighth Judicial District Court (Clark County, Nev.) Judge Eric Johnson in a case challenging Nevada's education savings account (ESA) program, which has attracted more than 6,000 applications since its inception despite legal challenges preventing the accounts from operating.

As has been the case with other big - name applications, the Android edition of Kindle is actually following in the footsteps of iPhone iteration.

In that case, while these 529 savings are not reported as a student asset on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), any distribution from this 529 plan is reported as income to the beneficiary, potentially resulting in a significant reduction in eligibility for need - based aid the following year.

In most cases, following the initial application of oxygen, the animal will need transport to a veterinarian (just like humans generally take a ride to the hospital after being rescued from a fire).

In cases where the application of punishment is considered, best practices of application and next steps can best be determined by understanding and following the Humane Hierarchy of Behavior Change — Procedures for Humane and Effective Practices, outlined in the diagram attached.

Policies: This program has written policies This program works with purebred Goldens This program requires an application fee They adopt out of the service territory on a case by case basis with board approval Requires a dog be returned if the owner can not keep Takes ownership of a dog upon intake Requires a home visit before adoption approval Follows up with adopters after placement Dogs are observed and evaluated before adoption All dogs receive all vaccines (Rabies, DHLPP and any other regionally appropriate tests) before adoption All dogs have all tests (heartworm, fecal and other regionally appropriate tests) before adoption.

A new follow - up publication of Case Studies on Climate Services for Health is in preparation, and will take a next step to outline with greater detail how a wide range of health applications can benefit from using climate and weather information; what steps and processes can be used to co-develop and use climate and weather information in the health sector; and showcase how such partnerships and services can really make a difference to the health community.

The Court confirmed that the concept includes «data concerning the medium to long - term consequences of those emissions on the environment, in particular information relating to residues in the environment following application of the product in question, and studies on the measurement of the substance's drift during that application, whether those data come from studies performed entirely or in part in the field or from laboratory or translocation studies» (case C - 442 / 14, paragraph 96).

However, the General Court accepted Gifi's argument that the Board failed to examine all the evidence it had produced, and the Board's judgment did not mention several of the designs cited: «In the present case, it is clear that, in the light of the Board of Appeal's assertion that it was required to re-examine the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety, followed by a one - by - one examination of the contested design in relation only to Designs D 1 to D 17, it is impossible to infer from the wording of the contested decision, or the context in which it appears, what is the implied reasoning justifying the failure to take into account Designs D 18 to D 22.»

This suggests that cases examining applications for attorney's fees in patent cases may also follow the Court's decision in Kirtsaeng and place special importance on the objective reasonableness of a losing party's litigation position.

However, when there is no reasonable prospect that any such evidence could allow the applicant to prove his or her case on a balance of probabilities, the application must be dismissed following the summary hearing.

In Utah, the no - fault standard usually finds its application in car accident cases, giving injury victims an avenue to receive compensation for certain losses following a collision.

This case relates to whether a solicitor acting for an applicant can be found personally liable to pay the costs of the respondent following the court's refusal to grant an application to issue a witness summons against the respondent.

Whilst the Court does not explicitly reiterate this cautious attitude, the way it structures the application of the test to the facts of the case follows that proposed by the Advocate - General which represents a welcome departure from the way the Court applied the same test in Allianz.

Therefore, the Constitutional Court expressed the view that matters of social security and claims following from them did not in the case of so - called Slovak pensions contain a foreign element which is a prerequisite for the application of the co-ordination regulation.

The application was dismissed and in doing so Master Bouck provided the following feedback about case - law disclosure for Chambers applications:

«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»

Motion to be heard 12 (1) If a defendant against whom a proceeding is brought or maintained considers the whole of the proceeding or any claim within the proceeding has been brought in response to their expression or public participation, the defendant may, subject to subsection (2), bring an application for one or more of the following orders: a) To dismiss the proceeding or claim, as the case may be; b) For costs and expenses; c) For punitive or exemplary damages against the plaintiff.

Following the decision of the Court of Appeal in Howard League for Penal Reform & Anor, R (On the Application of) v The Lord Chancellor [2017] EWCA Civ 244, new regulations have come into force returning some prison law cases to the scope of legal aid.

APPLICATION OF RULE 17 (14) At a case conference, settlement conference or trial management conference conducted by the Family Case Manager, rule 17 applies subject to the following chancase conference, settlement conference or trial management conference conducted by the Family Case Manager, rule 17 applies subject to the following chanCase Manager, rule 17 applies subject to the following changes:

Iowa's headline - making may well lead other courts to take a close look at similar cases and consider the application of their existing law as well; it may also embolden clients to seek emotional distress damages when they otherwise would have expected the general rule against them to be followed.

These days the remedies for people who feel that the Home Office has misapplied the law or failed to properly assess their case are far more limited; basically a right to a second pair of Home Office eyes reviewing their application followed by an application for judicial review if their pockets are sufficiently deep to finance their own legal team and face the significant costs that may be sought by government lawyers if their claim fails.

The recent Duncan Lewis judicial review case of Ibrahim, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 1347 (Admin) saw Duncan Lewis Immigration Solicitor Shahnaz Roshan representing a Sudanese national claimant who was subject to immigration detention following completion of his sentence for a serious offence.

Based on this case and the holding in Woodman, it appears that strict technical application of Section 281 of the Insurance Act may be overlooked in an application to amend a claim, especially where any number of the following factors may be present:

Indeed, following the decision it would be surprising if those acting for funded claimants did not consider making such applications; whether they will be successful will of course depend on the facts of a given case and the conduct of the parties».

This dispute before the DIFC Courts arose out of one of the Claimants in this case («Midtown») applying for enforcement of the NY Judgment, which was followed by an application for immediate judgment.

In Legend3D, Inc. (Petitioner) v. Prime Focus Creative Services Canada Inc. (Patent Owner), Case IPR2016 - 00806, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) lifted a stay of a pending reissue application following a Final Written Decision, thereby allowing the Patent Owner another opportunity to pursue amended claims.

For example, let clients know that the firm and members of the firm will not «friend» or «follow» clients or communicate about clients» cases using unencrypted social media applications.

In this sense, the Court seems to have implicitly confirmed that Art. 4.2 TFEU represents a clause of last resort that allows an exception to the application of the Treaties only when it is not possible to make recourse other provisions such as Art. 6.3 TEU (namely, when at stake there is not a fundamental right, as could be — for instance — the case in the application of an exception to the «strict conditionality» which follows the implementation of the economic and financial measures enacted to counter the economic crisis).

This is the case even if the court deals with that application after the expiry of the relevant period... This still remains the case following the recent civil justice reforms.»

[17] In the Law of Evidence in Civil Cases by Sopinka and Lederman, at p. 14 the authors also make reference to the quotation from Stephen's Digest as to the meaning of relevance and make the following statement that is applicable and worthy of consideration when assessing the relevancy of the documents that are before me on this application:

Barker recently acted for key client Google in two right to be forgotten cases and defended it in a European Court of Human Rights application made by an individual following an unsuccessful defamation claim.

Notable cases in which Pierre was involved included an appeal against deprivation of citizenship on national security grounds following remittal to SIAC by the Supreme Court in the case of Pham («B2»); an appeal concerning registration under the statelessness provisions of the British Nationality Act 1981 in the case of MK (India); three out of hours applications for injunctions successfully preventing same - day removal and numerous challenges to Home Office policy and the Immigration Rules.

The Supreme Court of Canada has passed up the opportunity to clarify the application of the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity (IJI) to reserve lands following its decisions in Tsilhqot» in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44 and Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources), 2014 SCC 48 (Keewatin) in June 2014 by denying leave to appeal in the Sechelt Indian Band case.

The material is well organized, easy to follow, and clearly addresses the various applications of limited scope to multiple aspects of family law practice, from document assistance, negotiation coaching, case management, limited scope court appearances and coaching of clients who are mediating their disputes.

The Court of Appeal's decision in Sechelt was significant because it demonstrated that IJI was still alive and well in relation to the lands reserved head of s. 91 (24) following the efforts of the Supreme Court of Canada in a series of cases including Canadian Western Bank v Alberta, 2007 SCC 22 and British Columbia (Attorney General) v Lafarge Canada Inc, 2007 SCC 23 to limit the application of the IJI doctrine.

In the second case released this week (Gignac v. Rozylo) the result was not nearly as harsh but the case still demonstrates the reality that applications for statutory deductions can be made following vehicle collision cases.

16 In the case of Aquilini v. Aquilini, 2012 BCSC 1616, Mr. Justice Smith dealing with an application for the appointing of a business valuator (similar to the case at bar) identified the following relevant factors for a court to consider when determining whether to exercise its discretion under Rule 13 - 4 (3) to appoint a joint expert in absence of an agreement at para. 43:

While the Board need not entirely decide the issue in this case, applications that allege only that an employer failed to provide a harassment free workplace or that simply take issue with the employer's determination following a complaint are unlikely to succeed or be heard.

We will follow your case from beginning to end until you're immigration application is approved.

The well - established legal test for an Injunction comes from a Supreme Court of Canada case called R.J.R. MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), and requires that the following questions be addressed by the court charged with the task of considering the Injunction application: