Sentences with phrase «case for global warming»

First, as we've discussed so often before, the contents of our article reveal that the hysterical case for global warming doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

The «hockey stick» may be a cause celebre among denialists, but it's only a secondary part of the mainstream case for global warming, which is based on the physics of the greenhouse effect and the observed warming of recent decades.

It claims to be «The Undeniable Case for Global Warming» from AGHG emissions.

And people keep on focusing on the two original studies by Mann because by focusing on just those studies this creates the impression that the whole case for global warming lies in studies of that sort, and that the science never moved beyond those two studies.

may be a cause celebre among denialists, but itâ $ ™ s only a secondary part of the mainstream case for global warming, which is based on the physics of the greenhouse effect and the observed warming of recent decades.

The accusation was incendiary: that scientists had grossly exaggerated the case for global warming by manipulating their data.

NASA's James Hansen bolstered the case for global warming and spoke out against government censorship.

Controversy arose after various allegations were made including that climate scientists colluded to withhold scientific evidence and manipulated data to make the case for global warming appear stronger than it is.

His attack on one climate - change study, known as the «hockey stick» — a study often cited to make the case for global warming — plucked McIntyre from obscurity and got him featured on the front page of the February 14, 2005, Wall Street Journal.

IF the case for global warming is so open and shut, why the need for a report as disingenuous as Mr Kofi Annan's... warning that climate change - induced disasters, such as droughts and floods, kill 315,000 each year and cost $ 125 billion, numbers it says will rise to 500,000 dead and $ 340 billion by 2030.

Why is it that they think every paper which strengthens the case for global warming is some kind of fraud, but every paper which they think weakens the case, is some kind of «bombshell»?

Nor that all progress is always good... But humankind has a great capacity for finding technological solutions to seemingly intractable problems, and this will likely be the case for global warming.

My suspicion is that their efforts will only end up making the case for global warming air - tight.

As a matter of science, the case for global warming, or climate change or whatever they are market it as this week, is pathetically non existent.

As for the cause, last year, Time reported on a comprehensive new review paper of «100 peer - reviewed post-IPCC studies» in an article titled, «Report: The Case for Global Warming Stronger Than Ever»

Moreover, the case for global warming does not rely primarily on observed warming; it has models, historical studies and other science behind it.

The case for global warming must instead be based on century - long temperature records over a large part of the globe.

The scandal fueled skepticism about the case for global warming just weeks before world leaders met to agree a global deal on climate change at a United Nations conference in Copenhagen last December.

An economist had written him, saying he had been interrupted by then - Senator Al Gore at a Washington lunch for daring to suggest that there was uncertainty about the case for global warming.

I'm writing a book called «The Case for Global Warming,» and Dr. O'Dell's discoveries about the peer - review system failure in the case of Lindzen and Choi 2009 would be relevant.

Climate scientists make a case for global warming by proving the existence of a hotspot in the Earth's troposphere.

The case for global warming has grown all but irrefutable, yet the skeptics have enjoyed enormous influence, for the audience that matters most to them occupies the White House.

Now, JJ goes on to claim that «I think you'll find the math doesn't work» which I interpret to mean the equation does not support the case for global warming alarmism.