'' [T] here's no discipline short of disbarment that would be appropriate in
this case given the magnitude of the offenses we have found and the effect upon the profession and the public.»
Not exact matches
Given the
magnitude of such a revelation, I suspect that isn't the
case, or we'd have already known.
They need to know the worst
case scenarios, and that the worst
case potential has gotten much worse over the past two years,
given the
magnitude of efects which we are seeing now, predicted for the year 2100.
Given that greater sensitivity matters for the
magnitude of imbalance a period during which this higher sensitivity is not activated should mean a slower rate of energy accumulation than would be the
case during a period of «normal» variability.
From the studies I've seen of UHI effects, I would expect the UHI to be substantial enough to show up in the adjustments — if that isn't the
case, then I doubt that the adjustments are doing thier job,
given the studies I've seen on the
magnitude of the UHI effect.
And in any
case,
given the amplitude and regularity of the dominant ~ 19.8 year cycle, the ~ sixty year cycle is about an order of
magnitude smaller than the 19.8 year cycle.