The closest to his «appearance» was some lawyers arguing
his case in absentia.
Not exact matches
Therefore,
in light of European
case law, the SCC concludes that the absolute content of the right to a fair trial does not require that a person convicted
in absentia has the chance of applying for retrial if the right has been voluntarily and unequivocally waived and the person was duly summoned and defended at trial by counsel.
Furthermore, although he concurs with the result
in this
case, he considers that there was no need to modify of the Court's doctrine on extradition
in cases of convictions rendered
in absentia.
The order contained three questions: (i) whether Article 4a (1) FD must be interpreted as prohibiting Member States from making the execution of an EAW subject to the possibility of retrial
in cases where a conviction has been rendered
in absentia; (ii) whether Article 4a (1) FD is valid
in light of Articles 47 and 48 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; and (iii) whether, under Article 53 of the Charter, it can grant a higher level of protection than that provided for under EU law.
100] Allowing the Spanish authorities to apply a different standard
in the present
case «would have the effect,
in particular, of seriously undermining the uniformity of the level of protection defined
in Article 4a (1) of the Framework Decision and might hinder the execution of European arrest warrants issued for the purpose of executing judgments given
in absentia.»
This distinction between both provisions is important because the possibilities for a conditional surrender regarding convictions
in absentia were broader under the old provision, leaving the Spanish Constitutional Court just enough leeway to continue the line of reasoning of its earlier
case law.
First of all, the national court wanted to know if the optional ground for refusal
in case of a conviction
in absentia as laid down
in the new Article 4a (1) FD EAW precludes the Executing State from making the surrender conditional on the right of a retrial
in the Issuing State, if deemed necessary by the Executing State, similar to what used to be possible on the basis of Article 5 (1) FD EAW 2002.
That jurisdiction is founded on statutory provision which requires the law of the DIFC to be first applied and only
in absentia to move on to the cascading subparagraphs» provisions, of which the last is the law of England and Wales, which for reasons which are apparent,
in the light of the decisions of the English Courts set out above (Burton J and Briggs LJ) on the absence of immunity of the KRG
in the present
case, does not assist the KRG.
If you have been convicted «
in absentia» (
in your absence), you have only 21 days to file a Request for Trial De Novo
in order to appear
in court to contest your
case from the date of mailing on your Notice of Decision on Trial
in Absentia.