He is mixing politics with politics as is
the case in theocracies a la Iranian.
Not exact matches
... and as for atheists / agnostics commenting on religious matters, it is important since uncontrolled religion can lead to various levels of
theocracy (e.g. Iran
in the extreme
case) which obviously would be detrimental to all of us.
Case in point: largely secular government = USA,
theocracy = Iran.
It's basically a «field manual» for the management and application of a system,
in this
case a
theocracy.
For
in that
case, the central authoritative figure has too much power and we would become a
theocracy.
The
theocracies found
in Iran and Saudi Arabia, where the clerics play a major role
in government (or have the final say on any government action
in the
case of Iran), tend to be the exception, rather than the rule.
(This assumes we're using
theocracy in the broad sense
in both
cases, and not taking about strict rule by religious authorities, whereby only a few countries, such as Iran, qualify).