This is also required in
case of any adverse action.
Not exact matches
Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was engaged in predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with high - interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many
of the Company's customers were using Qudian - provided loans to repay their existing loans, thereby inflating the Company's revenues and active borrower numbers and increasing the likelihood
of defaults; (iii) the Company was providing online loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the Company had understated the number
of its non-performing loans in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because
of the Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was subject to a heightened risk
of adverse actions by Chinese regulators; (vii) the Company's largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for loans provided by Qudian; (viii) the Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million Company customers had been leaked for sale to the black market, including names, addresses, phone numbers, loan information, accounts and, in some
cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed higher - education qualification verification institution in China, subjecting the Company to undisclosed risks
of penalties and financial and reputational harm; and (x) as a result
of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
No director, officer, employee, or volunteer
of the Rainforest Alliance who in good faith reports any
action or suspected
action taken by or within the Rainforest Alliance that he or she perceives to be illegal, fraudulent, or in violation
of any adopted corporate policy shall suffer intimidation, harassment, discrimination or other retaliation or, in the
case of employees,
adverse employment consequences.
In the employment situation, I think we'd see a lot more FCRA
cases challenging the accuracy
of those reports, not against the employer, but against the credit bureaus, growing out
of those
adverse action notices.
The Cooper Union requires Personnel to report to The Cooper Union good - faith concerns about behavior that appears to violate this Code, and under this Code a «Whistleblower» is the individual reporting such activity.The Cooper Union strictly prohibits any harassment, retaliation, or
adverse employment consequences against any Whistleblower who, in good faith, reports a violation or suspected violation
of this Code, and any person who retaliates against a Whistleblower is subject to appropriate disciplinary and corrective
action, up to and including termination
of employment in the
case of an employee.
The Cooper Union requires Personnel to report to The Cooper Union good - faith concerns about behavior that appears to violate this Code, and under this Code a «Whistleblower» is the individual reporting such activity.The Cooper Union strictly prohibits any harassment, retaliation, or
adverse employment consequences against any Whistleblower who, in good faith, reports a violation or suspected violation
of this Code, and any person who retaliates against a Whistleblower is subject to appropriate disciplinary and corrective
action, up to and including termination
of employment in the
case of an employee.
The new trustees now faced a classic dilemma; at the point where funds available were lowest, they had to decide whether to proceed with a
case against the original trustees with all the inherent risks that entailed in terms
of adverse costs if they lost or, not take
action but risk a future claim by the trust's beneficiaries for failing to carry out their duties in properly preserving the trust's assets.
Filing a Federal Rail Safety Act whistleblower retaliation complaint with OSHA within 180 days
of a railroad's
adverse action is a threshold issue that can derail the best
of cases.
To make out a prima facie
case of disability discrimination under the ADA or KCRA, a plaintiff must show that he or she is qualified, with or without reasonable accommodation, to perform the essential functions
of the job in which he suffered an
adverse employment
action.
Recent
cases have involved issues such as:
adverse possession
of farming land; nuisance due to flooding and contamination; a multi-party
action for breach
of contract as to farming subsidies, entitlements and negligence; and proprietary estoppel and a disputed trust
of land
action.
Discrimination
cases involve claims under federal statutes that prohibit
adverse employment
actions against members
of a protected -LSB-...]
The Texas Supreme Court ruled unanimously late last week in favor
of BP America Production Co. («BP») in a closely - watched
case involving two recurring issues: (1) the duty
of royalty owners to bring
actions in a timely fashion, and (2) the requisites
of adverse possession when unleased co-tenants mistakenly believe their mineral interests are under lease (more...)
To apply the
adverse inference for invocation
of the right against self - incrimination, a party in a civil
case must have been asked questions the answers to which would have been potentially incriminating in a future criminal
action, and the party must have invoked his Fifth Amendment rights.
If the competent authority intends to close the investigation without
action, it will inform the parties accordingly and, in some
cases, set a deadline for interested parties with
adverse interests to submit applications for the admission
of further evidence.
Nevertheless, it may be that the prospect
of adverse costs deters lawyers from bringing a class
action when the lawyers indemnify their clients; if this is the
case, then one would expect to see a marked difference in the number
of class
actions brought in Ontario compared to a jurisdiction with no cost shifting (such as British Columbia).
The FCRA requires any user
of a credit report to notify the consumer if the use
of that report resulted in an
adverse action, which, in the
case of insurance, would be denial
of coverage or a higher premium than a consumer with an average insurance credit score.
They must also ensure that they are not taking any form
of adverse action against their employment based on said
cases.
The FCRA requires that all background checks be conducted with consent and that in the
case an
adverse employment
action occurring as a result
of a background check, the applicant is entitled to certain notifications including a copy
of the report.