The rescue captain argued that the demotion violated his First Amendment right to intimate association, but the lower court dismissed
his case on a motion for summary judgment, concluding among other things that «Starling's First Amendment right to intimate association with Smith was not clearly established.»
Not exact matches
More recently, The Third Circuit, in a
case from Pennsylvania, affirmed a school board's
motion for summary judgment in response to a teacher's claim that officials violated her free speech rights
for terminating her employment over comments she posted
on her blog (Munroe v. Central Bucks School District, 2015).
In the first
case, there is a
motion for summary judgment — this might come to an amicable end, itf the parties can compromise
on terms of disclosure.
This is not a
case where the standard of proof
on a
motion for summary judgment would be relaxed in the name of proportionality.
Researchers might conduct correlational studies of existing
cases, as Long and Christenson did in their study of readability and success
on appeal241 or as Moss did in his mixed - methods study of employment discrimination
summary judgment motions.242 Or they might conduct an experiment asking participants to simulated
cases, as in the proposed modification of Chestek's study of preferences
for narrative elements in briefs.243 Alternatively, researchers could conduct qualitative studies of decision - makers believe that legal writing influences their decisions.
And so we will work
on the initial strategy really throughout the life of the
case even, but we also do sort of traditional law work, like
motions for summary judgment and responses, jury charge work, objecting to jury charges and also the post-verdict sort of prejudgment
motions phase and then even post-
judgment motion.
17 As a result of this asymmetry, the court that makes the most authoritative pronouncements
on the standard
for granting
summary judgment — the Court of Appeal — tends to do so in
cases where the
motions court has denied the complainant her day in court.
The Superior Court allowed the defendant insurer's
motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff was covered only by her husband's policy in this
case.
2008)-- Denial of manufacturer defendant's
motion for summary judgment in
cases arising from explosion at facility in Groton, Connecticut
on grounds that there existed genuine issues of fact as to product liability and recklessness counts of
case against manufacturer based
on its claimed failure to account
for and disclose relevant safety and storage information of risks involved in the transport and storage of chemical reagent at ambient temperatures.
Weinstein said, «While no partiality could be construed in rejecting defendant's
motion for summary judgment based
on timeliness, recusal now is desirable to avoid the appearance of partiality by the undersigned judge in future decisions in the
case.»
In the most recent
case, a lawyer who appeared
on the show had his claim against the CBC dismissed
on a
motion for summary judgment.
AT&T's
motion for summary judgment in that
case is scheduled
for a hearing
on Oct. 30.
Drafted
motion for summary judgment on behalf of component part manufacturer in a products liability
case that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiff's claims against the manufacturer.
The Court hearing the
case agreed with the defendant and granted the defendant's
motion for summary judgment, based
on the legal principle of assumption of the risk.
On April 21, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted a motion for summary judgment filed by Brooks Kushman on behalf of its client, Ford Motor Company, in a case involving a patent for fuel injection system technolog
On April 21, 2016, the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted a
motion for summary judgment filed by Brooks Kushman
on behalf of its client, Ford Motor Company, in a case involving a patent for fuel injection system technolog
on behalf of its client, Ford Motor Company, in a
case involving a patent
for fuel injection system technology.
Because our existing
case law holds that a property owner does not violate the duty of reasonable care by failing to remove natural accumulations of snow and ice, see Sullivan v. Brookline, 416 Mass. 825, 827 (1994), the judge concluded that, as a matter of law, the plaintiff could not prevail
on his claims of negligence; therefore, the judge allowed the defendants»
motions for summary judgment.
The overall weight of each of the factors just noted (as well as any other relevant factors) will be determined when the
case proceeds to the merits and all of the evidence is presented and assessed at trial or
on a
motion for summary judgment.
He added: «The plaintiff who treats a defence
motion for summary judgment as a speed bump
on the long highway to trial risks crashing its
case in the deep ditch of dismissal.»
[22] Rule 20.04 (2.1) is a statutory reversal of the
case law that had held that a judge can not assess credibility, weigh evidence, or find facts
on a
motion for summary judgment.
Acting
on a
motion for summary judgment filed by Hueston Hennigan, U.S. District Court Judge William H. Orrick held that although courts «sparingly grant
summary judgment in trademark
cases because they are so fact - intensive,» the evidence here tilted so heavily in favor of the defendants as to make
summary judgment appropriate.
Moving from
cases where the moving party's brief is significantly less readable than the non-moving party's brief to the opposite situations, the likelihood that the moving party prevails
on the
motion for summary judgment more than doubles from 42 % to 85 %.
In class actions alleging securities fraud, we have won scores of
cases for clients
on motions to dismiss, class certification,
summary judgment and at trial.
It varies from
case to
case depending
on whether the parties attempt to resolve the
case through negotiation or mediation,
on whether the employer files a
motion for summary judgment, and
on the court in which the
case is filed.
KWIKA filed a
motion for summary judgment, and
on the eve of the hearing, the insurer agreed to settle the
case.
D. New Mexico, 2014 (Docket No. 11 - CV -784-BRB / RHS), a New Mexico federal court granted the defendants»
motions for summary judgment, ruling that the plaintiff's failure to designate an expert witness
on the issue of medical causation before an April 17, 2013 deadline required that the
case be thrown out.
I am not going to comment
on whether or not I believe that the discovery process should be permitted in all
cases to run its course when a
motion for summary judgment is pending.
[2] Given the directions made by the Supreme Court of Canada
on the issue of proportionality in
summary judgment motions in its recent decision in Hryniak v. Maudlin, 2014 SCC 7 (CanLII), 2014 SCC 7, in my view when a request is made in an action
on the Toronto Region Commercial List
for a
summary judgment motion date, one judge should
case manage the proceeding.
In August 2015, a California federal court granted Weil's
motion for summary judgment on behalf of CBS Interactive Inc. (CBSI) in another landmark right of publicity
case (Lightbourne) that dismissed all of plaintiff's claims.
In
cases that call
for multiple findings of fact
on the basis of conflicting evidence emanating from a number of witnesses and found in a voluminous record, a
summary judgment motion can not serve as an adequate substitute
for the trial process.
So, in the circle of life that is the Toronto
motions culture, an Issues List developed at the suggestion of an experienced
case management judge to avoid
summary judgment motions and to secure an expedited trial of a dispute
on its merits, now finds itself confined to the dustbin of «judicial nice tries», with the parties turning their backs
on the proffered expedited trial date and hunkering down
for summary judgment motions.
In reviewing the factors in Rule 57.01 (1) and the relevant
case law, Justice Healey noted that the applicant had total success
on the
motion for summary judgment and that there had been insufficient evidence to support the respondents» positions.
The Trademark Office in this
case stated that in order to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to its intent to use
on a
motion for summary judgment, an applicant must rely
on specific facts that establish the «existence of an ability and willingness to use the mark in the United States to identify [the goods in the application] at the time of the filing of the application.»
Prepared recommendation memo
for the court
on a
motion for summary judgment for a mortgage foreclosure
case.