We know how to aggressively litigate
cases against sexual predators while delicately handling all of the powerful emotions involved.
Not exact matches
But I don't quite see how all this rhetoric about «pervert [ing] justice,» «maximum protection to children 16 and under,» and «the greatest attainment of protection of society
against child
sexual predators» fits with the
case in which the debate is about one day.
Since then, they have been invoked in an ever - growing array of anti-crime objectives including the war on drugs, to battle the scourge of gun crimes, high - level fraud
cases, and in the protection
against sexual predators and child pornography.