Not exact matches
Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or
at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hi
at the very
least the
author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (
At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hi
At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this
case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.
Senior
author Madhav Dhodapkar, M.D., the Arthur H. and Isabel Bunker Professor of Medicine and Immunobiology, and chief of Hematology, said the study, using tissue and blood samples from humans and mice, shows that chronic stimulation of the immune system by lipids made in the context of inflammation underlies the origins of
at least a third of all myeloma
cases.
In
at least one
case, the
authors of a retracted article claim they didn't use an agency and did not propose fake reviewers — which suggests the journal's editors invited the fake review instead.
And back - to - back earthquakes are more than theoretical, say the
authors, who note that this worst -
case scenario has happened
at least once in Italy's recent history.
Because most
cases of Parkinson's disease appear to be
at least partially caused by environmental factors such as pesticide exposure, these findings support the approach that targeting α - synuclein could slow or stop the progression of Parkinson's in most people with the disease, said study lead
author Jeff Bronstein, a professor of neurology and director of movement disorders
at the David Geffen School of Medicine
at UCLA.
«Our results suggest a role for gestational maternal infection and innate immune responses to infection in the onset of
at least some
cases of autism spectrum disorder,» says first
author Mady Hornig, associate professor of Epidemiology and director of Translational Research
at CII.
Over the last two years since I jumped into the blogging game, I have seen
at least half a dozen
cases of well - known
authors doing something equivalent to sticking their foot in it and pissing readers off either in small numbers or large.
As before, these earnings are across all channels, and Amazon sales still dominate, though several
authors this time around reported Apple sales increasing, and in a few
cases at least equaling Amazon earnings.
These [Amazon] sanctions have driven down Hachette
authors» sales
at Amazon.com by
at least 50 percent and in some
cases as much as 90 percent.
We have to wonder if this isn't a
case of art mimicking reality,
at least as far as the
author is concerned.
Look in almost any
author's laptop
case and you'll find
at least one pair of earbuds.
In these
cases, we notify the
author that the reviewer did not feel they could rate the book
at least 4 stars.
But sometimes, that pseudonym can mean creative freedom,
at least in the
case of one of the most famous contemporary
authors.
When I began writing this post I didn't want to include this information because there were no
cases of indie
authors successfully pitching to Amazon,
at least none that I knew of.
This might work for published
authors, but those of us still struggling to make our first sale have to
AT LEAST have a detailed synopsis and in most
cases we need to have a complete (or nearly complete) story before submitting.
In most
cases,
authors should fine tune pricing after they've got
at least 25 reviews in there.
Where it becomes problematic (or
at least interesting) is in the impact it has on other players to do their own thing — in this
case, with
authors and publishers, to set their own prices.
The terms for the self publishing arm are wildly different than the terms given to the
authors who were commissioned to do this and
at least in my
case weren't told of the self publishing arm.
And Matt Cutts has done a tremendous job in distributing books by unknown
authors, who in most
cases, or
at least in my
case, could have never done it on their own.
On the basis of «CREATOR principles» previously set by the SoA, demands include that
authors should receive «
at least» 50 % of the revenue from e-book sales, «not a mere 25 %» they do currently, that
authors don't have their «hands tied with contracts that can not be terminated when a book is no longer being exploited», for publishers to drop non-compete clauses and for indemnity clauses, often included to help protect publishers financially against
cases brought on the basis of plagarism and libel, «to spread the risk fairly between the publisher and the
author».
The
authors added, «[O] ur analysis shows that carbon releases from the soil after planting corn for ethanol may in some
cases completely offset carbon gains attributed to biofuel generation for
at least 50 years.»
A number of well - written articles chronicle
at least some of the history of legal writing in the law school curriculum.1 However, those articles were written with a different purpose in mind: the
authors sought to employ history to show the pedigree of legal writing and argue for an equal place in the curriculum with doctrinal courses and an equal position for its teachers with other «
case - book» faculty.2 Because of this purpose, they understandably focused a large part of their historical narrative on legal writing in the «modern law - school,» an entity that has existed only since the late 1800s.3 The articles paid considerably less attention to the era that preceded it, beyond brief mentions of the Inns of Court in England, apprenticeship in America, and the private law schools and early attempts
at law teaching that preceded Langdell's introduction of the
case method.4
The credit required by this Section 4 (c) may be implemented in any reasonable manner; provided, however, that in the
case of a Adaptation or Collection,
at a minimum such credit will appear, if a credit for all contributing
authors of the Adaptation or Collection appears, then as part of these credits and in a manner
at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing
authors.
The
author also discusses the blood quantum rule, cultural appropriation, Indigenous use of intellectual property laws, Two - Spirit identities (Indigenous transgender individuals), the landmark Delgamuukw and Tsilhqot» in
cases (recognition of Aboriginal title), non-benign myths about Indigenous peoples, the six - volume Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) final report on the residential school system where
at least 6,000 Indigenous children died, Canada's Stolen Generations (between 1960 and 1990, 70 - 90 % of Indigenous children in Canada were removed from their homes and placed into non-Indigenous homes), Inuit relocations, the issue of access to safe drinking water for First Nations communities, the five - volume report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Indigenous lands, education, treaties, and treaty - making.
A dissent
authored by Justice Pirtle cited
cases from 12 courts of appeals that have
at least mentioned the cause of action.
The
authors note that in
at least four
cases...
All
cases presented here were referred to one or both of the authors for forensic evaluation or treatment of a seemingly intractable situation, Cases were selected for the study on the basis of at least one child in the family having intensely rejected one of the parents on the basis of trivial or unsubstantiated accusations, apparently meeting Gardner's criteria for «parental alienation syndrome,» There was no attempt to match these cases with a control group of children whose parents had also separated and / or divo
cases presented here were referred to one or both of the
authors for forensic evaluation or treatment of a seemingly intractable situation,
Cases were selected for the study on the basis of at least one child in the family having intensely rejected one of the parents on the basis of trivial or unsubstantiated accusations, apparently meeting Gardner's criteria for «parental alienation syndrome,» There was no attempt to match these cases with a control group of children whose parents had also separated and / or divo
Cases were selected for the study on the basis of
at least one child in the family having intensely rejected one of the parents on the basis of trivial or unsubstantiated accusations, apparently meeting Gardner's criteria for «parental alienation syndrome,» There was no attempt to match these
cases with a control group of children whose parents had also separated and / or divo
cases with a control group of children whose parents had also separated and / or divorced.
For example, the below commenting MHP — who has been a parenting coordinator («
case manager») on
at least one
case known to the
author in which a severely battered woman lost custody of her daughter to the abusive father, and who regularly performs custody evaluations as well — appears oblivious to the impact of MHP fees (which typically are divided equally between the parents) on a parent with substantially lower income than the other: [ANONYMOUS LISTSERVE COMMENT]: «If you want the parents to cooperate, why not add a provision that they must go back to mediation or to a parent coordinator if they can not come to an agreement.