Not exact matches
Money is moving out
of iron ore but where it goes next is the more interesting question,
because it seems that some investors are developing a taste for agriculture — a shift that might prove to be a
case of leaving the frying pan to land in the fire.
That's
because one
of the advantages
of owning preferred stock is that preferred stock holders get their
money back before «common» stock - holders in the
case of a fire sale.
«Usually, data protection lawyers tell us, «I love your
case, I love what you're doing, but I make
money on the other side
of the game,
because that's the only place you can make
money»,» said Mr Schrems.
In all
of the above
cases the entrepreneur who is susceptible to the confirmation bias will look for information and analyze it in a way that will yield: 1) fewer competitors rather than more,
because it increases the viability
of the start - up, 2) underestimation
of the capabilities
of the competition
because stronger competitors will make life harder for the entrepreneur, 3) view
of the company's product as fully addressing the needs
of the customer
because otherwise the start - up is at a weaker position in the marketplace, and 4) need for less resources rather than more
because it generally makes raising the
money easier.
I have often seen
cases in which entrepreneurs are unable to repay relatives
because they subsequently raise
money from professional investors who do not look kindly on business owners who try to repay one class
of equity investors before others.
In the
case of the small business, most if not all
of the company's profits are used to pay salaries and fringe benefits, which are deductible, and double taxation may be avoided
because no
money is left over for distributing dividends.
In the
case of the small business, though, double taxation may not be a consideration,
because most, if not all
of the company's profits are reinvested in the business or go to pay salaries and fringe benefits, which are deductible, and no
money is left over for distributing dividends.
If both sides, through their eyes and their people's eyes, have concluded that the plaintiff is absolutely going to win this
case, and the plaintiff is going to get a lot
of money because they're totally on board with everything that has been presented, then that might be a good reason for the defendant to agree to a settlement with the plaintiff for less
money than the potential exposure if the jury comes back and finds willful infringement.
This decision probably shouldn't have been a surprise,
because it basically said that the court's 2010 decision in the Citizens United
case, upholding the right
of corporations to spend
money in federal elections, applies to the states as well.
As several key copyright
cases have shown — including the
case of Perfect 10 vs. Google, and a decision involving Google's book - scanning project — just
because someone uses content that another entity charges
money for doesn't preclude a finding
of fair use.
In the
case of a loan, even though you end up with new cash in your account, the
money is technically not yours
because you have to pay it back eventually.
While predatory pricing technically remains illegal, it is extremely difficult to win predatory pricing claims
because courts now require proof that the alleged predator would be able to raise prices and recoup its losses.405 Revising predatory pricing doctrine to reflect the economics
of platform markets, where firms can sink
money for years given unlimited investor backing, would require abandoning the recoupment requirement in
cases of below - cost pricing by dominant platforms.
'' Mr. Oundo [Living Goods Field Supervisor] discussed one
case in which a woman's young child had diarrhea and the child's condition was deteriorating, but the mother could not seek treatment
because she did not have
money to travel and her husband was out
of town.
Banks and other institutions could lend more
money every time the Fed reduced rates, and this led consumers to feel more confident in borrowing more, but it stressed their actual financial system beyond repair in many
cases, and it caused stress for those that didn't borrow
because they felt priced out
of the housing market.
He also mentions a
case study that demonstrated how most investors fail to make
money because of bad timing.
It is simply
because the amount
of money required to invest in this type
of businesses is in the range
of millions and in some
cases billions (all in dollars).
In a stock world, if I get a cash dividend
because I own the stock, that
money is not treated as a «treasure trove» and subject to ordinary income rates — in most
cases, it is a qualified dividend and subject to capital gain rates; in some
cases, some types
of stock dividends are completely non-taxable.
It will be interesting, at the end
of the process
of disbursing this
money, to learn just how many Jewish dormant accounts actually exist, and in how many
cases identifiable heirs were actually denied access to their
money because of Swiss machinations.
Neville there were times when dominionism worked for Israel which were the exceptions rather than the rule but generally it did nt sadly
because of the wickedness
of peoples hearts.Power tends to corrupt people ie in the
case of nebbucanezzar especially when they succeed.Like you i think Gods people have more impact by just letting Christ work through them could be me but i find politics tends to involve power
money and compromise.Regardless
of what political state we find ourselves Gods sovereign and his will be done on earth as it is in heaven.My focus is real simple just follow Jesus with all my heart mind soul and strength and love others as myself and that is just following Jesus daily and trusting him in everything.regards brentnz
In the
case of Aaron Ramsey, if Barca can give Arsenal a good
money for value, Arsenal can sell him to them
because both Arsenal and Barcelona have been partners in the transfer market for long.
I personally think he needs to bulk up some... Bielek is earning rave reviews though and his progression is going as planned, Akpom needs a proper talking to, his problem is more attotude than lack
of ability, just like Gnabry, I think
because both had a run with the senior squad they feel like they are big enough to.command regular shirts where they play which is not the
case, you have to earn the right to play on a Saturday afternoon, its never handed out to you... all in all, its been a disastrous season for us
of you look at progress Te English players are making at Spuds whilst our» s sit on their asses earning ridiculous
money for doing eff all....
Not the
case at ALL other big clubs,
because they expect progress straight away, especially considering the amount
of money they spend.
Because in Wenger's thinking, If Arsenal has a Stadium with the seating capacity closer to that
of Man Utd's Old Trafford Stadium, Arsenal will start to realise far much
money than they were getting at Highbury which will subsequently enabled them to be buying some world class prayers on regular basis than it's presently the
case.
Remember we got an Academy and some players need to come from within our system I for one would be delightedly happier if the solution comes out from within rather than buying and putting
money into agent pockets particularly when prices are inflated this inflation got to be burst before we all get bussed come on 100 milion for pogoba if thats the
case what
money is on messi or ronaldo or for the new messi and the new ronaldo you got to have limit this limitless soccer business got to stop some where and the
monies got to filter down I like the premier league
because all have equal opportunity but than you have guys like the moron morinho will just spend and get his player no matter what the costs are as I said they must be a limit and for that reason I salute MR wenger and the likes
of Leicester
And sometimes the only reason such popular players would want to play for you is the
money; and in some
cases, when you buy them they just under - perform
because of their ego.
Because of geography and shoe
money, Maryland fans can talk themselves into having a solid «sleeping giant»
case.
Young players might also go for the
money,
because they don't have the huge cash reserves
of older players to see them through in
case they face career - ending injuries.
The fact is especially problematic in the Broncos
case because they were paying for an elite product at the QB position and that took
money from the rest
of the team, and they won withone
of the worst QB's in the league.
Selling him abroad this season to me will be one
of Wenger's best and most brave decisions ever.He'll get my respect tor that.Who says we can't win the league with another player in his position?Have faith for all is not lost.The Van Persie
case ws very different since at that time we were not financially strong and couldn't replace having to settle for second rate players except Cazorla at that time.In this
case we can actually replace him.I can still see Arsenal getting Lemar
because we still have a lot
of money for transfers.If we can't get Lemar we should try other options for there's always better.
Talking about «artificial
money» insinuates that the reason we are dropping down the PL table fast is
because of money but that is not the
case.
I'm not for one minute suggesting
money was held back
because of that work, but it was one
of those quotes that I make a note
of in
case I ever need to come back to it a couple
of years down the line.
And going to court, even in the
case you get a lawyer, is a complete waste
of money,
because they will not pay a penny.
The progression
of thought appears to be: something bad happened to me (in this
case Mrs. Liew lost her husband); it was someone else's fault; I deserve lots
of money for no other reason than
because something bad happened.
The prosecutor said that given the allegations in the
cases he's brought this week, he's got some pointed questions he wants answers to, including finding out how many bills were born
of bribery and how many items in the state budget got there
because money changed hands.
As has been the
case in the past, both Democrats and Republicans have substantial pockets
of money unlikely to be spent on this year's campaigns,
because the funds belong to former members who have since died or been indicted.
Singas said those funds were some
of the same
monies at issue in Ippolito's federal
case — with a $ 400,000 difference
because Nassau prosecutors focused on Ippolito's return to a period
of government employment that started in 2009.
Half
of this day I've spent running between bank and police station
because I had to file the
case against some idiot who copied my credit card or something and used all
of my
money.
Many men are afraid
of dating Russian
because they think that they are only going for marriage and
money, but that is really not the
case.
In the
case of Mad
Money, I'll write a short review
because the movie won't sustain a long one.
The U.S. Supreme Court later applied similar reasoning in the 2011
case ACSTO v. Winn, rejecting the standing
of petitioners to challenge Arizona's scholarship tax - credit law
because the funds did not become public
money since they had not «come into the tax collector's hands.»
In the
case of charter schools, local
money provides a clear benefit to local students
because it follows them to their school
of choice, wherever it is.
A technician with air tools and a lift will have a much easier time diagnosing a problem like this and just replace what is necessary for the problem, but a DIY «home mechanic» may be safer in these situations by just doing both sides, and in some
cases, and in my
case, I saved myself some
money because I likely would've worn another pair
of pads and warped another rotor if I hadn't replaced both sides at the same time.
In some
cases, people skip over service appointments
because they are afraid
of the cost or simply don't have the extra
money at the time.
(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds
of listings on the Vault, and as a result
of doing so, won't see one thin dime
of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and
money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf
of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any
of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out
of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share
of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11
of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going
because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies
of my novels than I've sold,
because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools
of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part
of the Rise
of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every
case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour
of my time spent reading and commenting In spite
of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage
of my fellow authors.
So, to get back to the question from yesterday's post
of why should the Department
of Justice spend
money on this investigation, they should do it in order to enforce the antitrust laws
because consumers, authors and shareholders in the companies involved are being damaged by the price fixing, assuming the DoJ can prove its
case.
Even then,
money, fame and fortune were not guaranteed
because even though you had many authors and hundreds
of thousands
of books available, the reader market was not that great and publishers were really not focusing on new authors, but instead continued to support established and well marketed books.With the introduction
of new technology and the drive to store lot
of books electronically in
case of certain disaster lead to the eBook phenomena.
Understand What You're Really Selling: In this
case,
money is not made totally FROM self publishing, it is made
BECAUSE of it.
If you search for the app in the store, you will still see the little cloud beside it that lets you download the title again (which is good, I suppose...
because some
of these apps may have cost you
money, and you don't want to lose record
of that in
case you later change your mind about removing it).
So i think you should sell
cases because i would pay alot
of money to have one
of those beautiful
cases and i also do nt have the time and effort to make one myself so please just think about it.
Covers, editing, promotion, you can do them on the cheap but the most likely outcome is not going to be great (and the sad thing is that it's not even a
case of «you get what you pay for»
because sometimes you don't even get that; I spent a lot
of money on editors and ended up with error - ridden books nonetheless).