Duck, I too may have confirmation
bias like Mike Ede, but dang it, you'll see it's well provoked when you look at the
actual food composition and details that I'm only now noticing
of what's raw and what's cooked / cooled and... Here's that email, in
case anyone wants to make this:
Using liquid and ice microphysics models reduces the
biases in cloud optical thicknesses to ≲ 10 %, except in
cases of mistaken phase identification; most
of the remaining
bias is caused by differences between
actual cloud particle sizes and the values assumed in the analysis.
(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call evidence after prosecution and defence
case closed; use
of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance
of a prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back
of the defence; whether such communication redolent
of actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent
bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct
of judge; legal effect
of serving BSB prosecutions department officer being 1
of 4 appointing members
of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power
of removal
of member
of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position
of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role
of BSB prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB
of notes
of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)