Sentences with phrase «cases respect its decisions»

For Kawhi case I respect his decision to not to play if he does not feel comfortable but I don't support it as the team doctors already cleared him to play.

True it is that the awarding of new trials falls properly within the province of the judiciary; but if the Legislature of Connecticut has been in the uninterrupted exercise of this authority in certain cases, we must in such cases respect its decisions as flowing from a competent jurisdiction or constitutional organ.

Not exact matches

If any of the court cases against Kinder Morgan land in our favour, the public will need to mobilize quickly to force governments to respect the decision.

In many cases, the children about whom the decisions are being made are too young to subscribe to the religious beliefs held by their parents, yet we continue to respect the parents beliefs.

It may well be the case that God so respects the «humanity» of each particular individual that he will seldom, if ever, override those decisions which are significant in an individual's own life history, even if the actualization of such decisions will negatively affect large numbers of people.

That respect for the past reasserted itself this term in the surprising 7 «2 reaffirmation of the benighted Miranda decision, and it played a part in the partial «birth abortion case.

The real situation in which the Christian of today has to make his moral decisions is in any case such that in very many and very important instances, the decision can no longer be the simple and obvious application of the principles concerning essences, even if he respects these as absolutely and universally valid.

I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by other departments of the government.

Selling him abroad this season to me will be one of Wenger's best and most brave decisions ever.He'll get my respect tor that.Who says we can't win the league with another player in his position?Have faith for all is not lost.The Van Persie case ws very different since at that time we were not financially strong and couldn't replace having to settle for second rate players except Cazorla at that time.In this case we can actually replace him.I can still see Arsenal getting Lemar because we still have a lot of money for transfers.If we can't get Lemar we should try other options for there's always better.

A statement on UEFA's website read: «UEFA has constantly insisted on the need for a rapid decision on the merits of the case and has therefore already confirmed its availability, in an effort to respect all of the dates proposed by the CAS.»

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

Staten Island DA Dan Donovan, who acted as the special prosecutor in Sen. Kevin Parker's assault case, released a statement in the wake of the Brooklyn Democrat's conviction on two misdemeanor charges, saying he respects the jury's decision despite the fact that it did not deliver a felony guilty verdict.

You can't precisely accuse George W. Bush of rigging Florida in 2000 by winning a court case, although some do accuse him of «stealing» the election, since they don't agree with all the various courts» decisions in respect of the recount.

The Crown Prosecution Service today thanked the woman for her «courage» during the case, saying that they respected the jury's decision after the footballer was found not guilty of rape.

«While we are disappointed by the Second Circuit's decision, we respect it, and look forward to retrying the case,» Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Joon H. Kim said in a statement.

In each and every case, Albany agreed and respected the right of New York City to make a decision on revenue.

«In each and every case Albany respected the right of New York City to make its own decision.

«While we are disappointed by the Second Circuit's decision, we respect it, and look forward to retrying the case,» Manhattan Acting US Attorney Joon H. Kim said in a statement.

And this has led to a district culture «of shared planning, decision - making, and responsibility» that is «built on respect, commitment, and trust,» as a 2011 case study puts it.

Parents for Educational Freedom NC's president, Darryl Allison, said in a statement following Judge Hobgood's decision to halt the program while the merits of the case are decided, «while we respect the court's decision, we are deeply disappointed on behalf of the thousands of working - class families who desired this educational option,» he said.

I am convinced that it is because Vallas operates on the basis of the Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott case: «Black people have no rights that Whites are bound to respect.»

The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.

The Division also provides extensive analytical support and advice to Department decision makers with respect to specific cases and matters before the Department, including airline mergers and alliances, selection of U.S. carriers in international route authority selection cases, and antitrust immunity cases.

But I think Mr. Mosher is making an excellent case for rejecting proxies in general as a basis for making drastic policy decisions with respect to climate.

GaryM June 26, 2013 at 5:20 pm But I think Mr. Mosher is making an excellent case for rejecting proxies in general as a basis for making drastic policy decisions with respect to climate.

In this respect, the evidence upon which a decision could be made was greater than the evidence that Prakash J. dealt with in SM Integrated Transware Ltd v. Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd. [6] However, in this instance, the learned judge took the view that the e-mail address was similar to an automatically generated name and facsimile number of the sender of a facsimile transmission, a state of affairs considered in the New York case of Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co., Inc. v. Estate of Fred Short, d / b / a Sime Construction Co. [7] Counsel for J Pereira Fernandes SA submitted that the intent to sign was not relevant, and mentioned Elpis Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Marti Chartering Co..

Because in this case both statutory decision makers (ie the Standards Board and the Adjudication Panel) comprise persons identified by Parliament «because of their experience knowledge and position to apply the relevant Code», therefore «absent an error of law the court is to pay considerable respect to the decision of what is an informed domestic tribunal».

Moreover, it is apparent from the case - law -LSB-...] that the legislation indicated «that property not belonging to private persons shall be administered and alienated according to the specific rules applicable to them; that, in respect of property belonging to public entities, even those pursuing industrial and commercial activities, the principle of non-seizability of that property precludes recourse to private - law enforcement remedies; that only the creditor who has obtained an enforceable favourable judicial decision having acquired the force of res judicata and ordering a public entity to pay, even provisionally, an amount of money, may have enforced the specific rules [applicable].

In this respect, the AG rightly recalls that, if this were true, the imputability to the State would not inevitably follow as Stardust Marine teaches us that, in case of decisions taken by public undertakings, the imputability to the State must be demonstrated by establishing «the actual exercise by the State of the supervisory powers which its status as majority shareholder confers upon it» or «the actual involvement of the public authorities» (para 99) in the adoption of the decision.

I educate my clients with respect to the potential strategies applicable to their situation so that they can participate in their case and offer informed decisions.

This emphasis — combined with our legal experience, our research resources, the strong network of professional relationships we have built, the respect and trust we have earned among our peers, and just as importantly, our enthusiasm — enables us to give the sound advice that enables you to make informed legal decisions regarding your case.

I believe, with respect, that this approach or principle can be found well expressed in a case that was cited to us, Lebon Construction Ltd. v. Wiebe (1995), 10 B.C.L.R. (3d) 102 (C.A.), a recent decision of this court.

Citing Walsh v. Mobil, 2008 ABCA 268 (CanLII) at 43, the Court of Appeal noted its role involved determining whether the reviewing judge's decision (in this case the decision of Topolniski J.C.Q.B.A. with respect to the Chief Commissioner's decision) chose and applied the correct standard of review.

Once that is determined, it is important that each family member respects that person's authority and decisions relating to that case.

Decisions in respect of the media will be made on a case by case basis.

This case has had such a significant impact on civil legal proceedings in the courts in Ontario, including with respect to the access to justice, that it has, in the course of one year since the decision was released, been cited in more than 400 reported decisions of the courts in Canada.

In both respects, the majority's decision typifies a troubling imbalance that plagues our case law in this area.

Ralph Steinhardt has authored a case book on what he calls «intermestic law,» that is the «the variety of foreign, domestic, and international sources from which domestic courts derive a rule of decision, as well as the logistical difficulties they face when rules, attorneys, clients, and issues show little if any respect for physical or political borders.»

But, the decision leaves Congress with the option of potentially changing that statute which currently limits the personal jurisdiction of federal trial courts to that of a state court of general jurisdiction in the same state, as it already does in cases that are predominantly «in rem» (e.g. interpleader cases and interstate boundary and real property title disputes), in bankruptcy cases, and with respect to the subpoena power of U.S. District Courts.

Applying case law: In the matter of Dacosta v. 2383924 Ontario Inc., the decision of the Tribunal assesses the appropriate compensation for injury to dignity, feelings and self - respect.

The starting point is that the decision - maker is under a duty of transparency and fairness (which in this case required full disclosure of the model and underlying data); it should not normally give undertakings as to confidentiality in respect of material that fairness dictates it should disclose as part of its consultation.

The provisions of paragraph 1 may, however, be declared inapplicable in the case of: - any agreement or category of agreements between undertakings, - any decision or category of decisions by associations of undertakings, - any concerted practice or category of concerted practices, which contributes to improving the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress, while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit, and which does not: (a) impose on the undertakings concerned restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of these objectives; (b) afford such undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the products in question.

This decision made in respect of a failure of lawyers to file a costs» budget — the opportunity to claim costs was effectively lost at the outset of the litigation by the failure to submit the costs» budget — is the touchstone for legal advisers and their clients in understanding the attitude of the courts to failure by a party to adhere strictly and accurately to the requirements of case management set out in the rules, practice directions, and the tailored orders of the court in the individual case.

The Appellant therefore applied to the Supreme Court to appeal the decision made in respect of B's habitual residence and sought consideration as to whether the circumstances of the case were «dire and exceptional», so as to allow the Court's inherent jurisdiction to be exercised.

In all cases, employers should strive to seek the least intrusive amount of information that gives them a sufficient understanding of the individual's disability - related needs in order to make an informed decision with respect to potential accommodations in the workplace.

This is not yet true with respect to earlier Supreme Court decisions on CanLII, which are also limited to cases originating in British Columbia or Ontario.

Rather than being about self - regulation, I see these cases as showing the importance of administrative law and the Charter to the Law Societies and the role of the courts with respect to Law Society decisions and with respect to the Charter.

Legal Realism Unpublished Decisions, Non-Citation Rules, and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 Existing Legal Scholarship and Empirical Data A DETAILED COMPARISON OF PRINT AND ELECTRONIC RESEARCH PROCESSES — IDENTIFYING SALIENT DIFFERENCES Electronic Researchers Are Not Guided by Key System Information to the Same Extent as Print Researchers with Respect to Identifying Relevant Theories, Principles, and Cases Electronic Researchers Do Not Encounter and Interpret Individual Cases Through the Lens of Key System Information to the Same Extent as Print Researchers Electronic Researchers Are Exposed to More — and Different — Case Texts than Print Researchers COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY - DERIVED PREDICTIONS ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF A CHANGED RESEARCH PROCESS: DIVERSITY IN FRAMING AND TILTING AT WINDMILLS Principles and Theories of Cognitive Psychology Influence of Labeling Influence of Categories Confirmatory Bias and Selective Information Processing Application of Cognitive Psychology Principles to Legal Research Diversity in Framing.

This decision has been the subject of considerable discussion among arbitration practitioners: as was discussed several months ago on Slaw, the case raises a number of difficult questions about how international arbitration and Canada's treaty obligations in that respect interact with local procedural law — specifically limitation of actions — when seeking to enforce the award, and more generally whether foreign judgments and arbitral awards should continue to be treated, for limitations purposes, as mere contract debts.

This case follows two earlier conflicting decisions of the High Court and Competition Appeals Tribunal in respect of the same subject - matter: Asda Stores Ltd v. Mastercard -LSB-...]