Sentences with phrase «cash per pupil»

This is described as «above flat cash per pupil to allow gaining schools to gain up to 3 %».

It is a simple fact that since 2011, education funding has been flat cash per pupil.

Not exact matches

If you drive per pupil funding towards a certain group - an extremely worthy group admittedly - but then hold cash funding per pupil at the same level overall then you are actually cutting * cash * spending per pupil for the majority.

The Spending Review admits as much as it only plans to maintain per pupil funding in cash terms.

«The Ethnic Minority Achievement Grant helps support the learning needs of some of the most vulnerable children in our schools yet the per - pupil value of the grants has been frozen in cash terms.

The Conservative party says it would protect school expenditure in cash terms per pupil, whereas Labour says it would protect school expenditure in real terms.

The net cost of these transitional arrangements is around # 290 million in 2019 --- 20, which temporarily boosts spending per pupil by about 0.7 per cent in cash - terms.

According to school choice supporters, such as Marquette University professor and former Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) superintendent Howard Fuller, MPCP saves the taxpayers considerable cash, as the voucher is smaller than per - pupil spending by MPS.

Typically, these surpluses are used to build operating reserves of about 5 percent of a school's yearly budget, to insure against normal cash - flow needs, temporary revenue interruptions, or fluctuations in annual per - pupil funding levels.

In that context, I am confirming that in 2017 to 2018 no local authority will see a reduction from their 2016 to 2017 funding (adjusted to reflect authorities» most recent spending patterns) on the schools block of the dedicated schools grant (per pupil funding) or the high needs block (cash amount).»

As in 2015, the 2016 research showed that for some schools (28 per cent in 2015/34 per cent in 2016) it was important that provision was made for cash based payers, allowing children or parents to bring cash into schools for various items, whilst in many secondary schools pupil's still queue to pay the money into a cash re-filer in the canteen, requiring students to take cash into school.

a minimum cash increase for every school of one per cent per pupil by 2019 - 20, with the most underfunded schools seeing rises of three per cent per pupil in 2018 - 19 and 2019 - 20

Ministers maintain they have protected funding by ensuring the cash per - pupil it hands to schools remains static.

uk which uses the DfE's forecasts for individual schools» funding per pupil in cash terms following the implementation of the proposed new funding formula, and the National Audit Office's predictions for cost increases facing schools, in order to produce forecasts for individual schools» funding per pupil in real terms compared to now.

On school funding, the prime minister promised to protect «flat cash» per pupil spending, but this would reduce in value with inflation.

Under the new formula, all schools will be guaranteed a 0.5 per cent cash terms rise in their per pupil funding in 2018 - 19 and 2019 - 20, while some schools will see their funding increase by 3 per cent in each of the next two years.

David Cameron has promised a future Conservative government would protect England's schools budget in cash terms, but per pupil funding would not keep pace with inflation.

But the Institute for Fiscal Studies says this will not match rising pressures on school budgets: «No school will see a cash - terms cut in spending per pupil, but most will see a real - terms cut.»

With multiple chartering authorities, local school districts can be adversely impacted as the per - pupil expenditures are re-allocated or deducted from operational revenue essential to maintain already cash - strapped school district operations.

And the state's per - pupil funding method allocates varying amounts of additional cash to North Carolina's poor and rural counties.

The plans, announced late last year, will change the way that per pupil funding for schools is allocated and will mean a cash boost for more than half of schools, according to the government.

For the first time in years, Prop. 30 offered financial relief for LAUSD's cash - strapped schools, which have weathered a budget crisis, teacher layoffs, and dismally low per - pupil funding.

(Schools with mobile pupils of at least 10 per cent get cash, but only for pupils that join in any month other than August of September).

A spokesman for the Department for Education said: «We're protecting the schools budget in cash terms per pupil, introducing a pupil premium for disadvantaged pupils, and putting money directly into heads» hands.

The survey also suggests that few schools have seen any benefits from the extra cash targeted at poorer pupils through the pupil premium - worth # 430 per eligible pupil.

What's next: The government has again vowed to protect cash spending per pupil although no details have been revealed.

When the pupil premium is included, ministers have protected per - pupil spending in cash terms until 2015 - but have admitted some schools will see their budgets drop.

Because it is a per pupil guarantee, the changes will only amount to a cash increase if schools have static or rising rolls.

And so the scramble for cash goes as charters are incentivized to pick off students from the most well - off districts so they can maximize their per - pupil revenues.

The NAO found that the DfE's planned cash increase of 7.7 % between 2016 and 2020 for Schools and High Needs DSG converts to an increase in funding per pupil of only 1.3 %.

Looking at the worst of all the political promises (flat cash funding per pupil) set against cost increases averaging at 1.5 % (approximately 8 % over five years), the situation looks very bleak, with the prospect of worse to come.

«In that context, I am confirming that in 2017 - 18 no local authority will see a reduction from their 2016 - 17 funding (adjusted to reflect authorities» most recent spending patterns) on the schools block of the dedicated schools grant (per pupil funding) or the high needs block (cash amount).

For example, if per pupil funding is frozen in cash terms, as it is now, and the minimum funding guarantee of -1.5 per cent remains in place, almost all schools will reach their formula level of funding by 2029 - 30.

«I am confirming that in 2017 - 18 no local authority will see a reduction from their 2016 - 17 funding (adjusted to reflect authorities» most recent spending patterns) on the schools block of the dedicated schools grant (per pupil funding) or the high needs block (cash amount).»

The government's decision to protect school funding only in flat cash terms per pupil leaves schools facing a real - term cut of # 3 billion by 2020, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).