There have been rumours for some time that a set of Chambers is facing severe
cashflow problems.
Considering
its cashflow problems over the last year, it isn't going to be dropping $ 300 million plus on a company if they don't expect it to be a major part of its strategy going forward.
Raab recently expressed the opinion that people who use food banks typically do so because they have an occasional «
cashflow problem».
They have to solve the cash &
cashflow problem here...
That is an indication of an oncoming
cashflow problem.
But, that can then hamper future business needs, effectively creating
a cashflow problem.
Not exact matches
When borrowers are unable to repay debt out of operating
cashflow, the
problem is usually «managed» away by forcing losses onto some other entity.
A major
problem with Price / Sales (and also Price /
Cashflow) is that it is never adjusted for any minority ownership of subsidiaries.
The real
problem is that the market's now alarmed that the company will need extra funding to reach a positive
cashflow situation.
I don't consider this a serious
problem myself, all it needs is more money, time and brains... I'd be more concerned about their cash burn rate — the real negative for the share price was the fact the company strongly hinted they'd become
cashflow positive this year.
Then he talked about «square meters, transfer fees, and micro-financing for smaller galleries,» and concluded that the «real issue is
cashflow because galleries that have a lot of successful artists often have the
problem that they are funding a lot of museum and biennial shows and production costs.»
The only real
problems are the $ 100 Billion
cashflow of the coal industry, the $ 1 Trillion
cashflow of the total fossil fuel industry and people who object to nuclear for reasons unknown to me.
The
problem we have with GW is overcoming a TRillion dollar
cashflow.
But
cashflow can always be a
problem.