Not exact matches
Cat Wars has a broader, more ecological focus, documenting the global
impact of
cats on wildlife, both by preying
on animals and by transmitting diseases.
Even small populations of feral
cats can have a negative
impact on public health and other
wildlife.
«Even
cats that are regularly fed can and do kill
wildlife,» states a commission report
on the
impact of outdoor
cats in Florida.
Instead, it opted for a low - key approach of meeting with the
cat - colony supporters and
cat owners in a public relations campaign «focusing
on responsible
cat ownership and the
impact on native
wildlife posed by feral and free - ranging
cats.»
These
cats are incredibly independent and can have a drastic ecological
impacts on the
wildlife surrounding their home ranges as they are not only skilled hunters, but they often carry diseases that can have a detrimental effects
on other animals.
Feral
cats can have a devastating effect
on wildlife, which can negatively
impact the environment.
These numbers are far too low to have any meaningful
impact on the daily risk of disease, injury, or
wildlife predation by
cats.
Although the actual
impacts of community
cats compared to pet
cats on wildlife are hotly debated, one issue that is not is that the capacities of most shelter programs are simply insufficient to decrease the overall number of outdoor
cats in a community.
To hear The
Wildlife Society's staunch opponents of TNR tell it, the media's just not interested in stories about «the
impacts of free - ranging and feral
cats on wildlife.»
Nevertheless, if we want to better understand the
impact of free - roaming
cats on wildlife, we can not ignore the distinction between — and inherent implications of — these two types of predation.
On the other hand, cats dumped near a managed colony are far more likely to be adopted and / or sterilized — thereby mitigating their potential impact on the overall population of unowned cats — as well any impacts to wildlife and the environmen
On the other hand,
cats dumped near a managed colony are far more likely to be adopted and / or sterilized — thereby mitigating their potential
impact on the overall population of unowned cats — as well any impacts to wildlife and the environmen
on the overall population of unowned
cats — as well any
impacts to
wildlife and the environment.
To determine the population
impact of trap and remove (culling) efforts
on two open population sites in Tasmania, researchers used
wildlife cameras and
cat counts to track the number of
cats at each site.
Indeed, the Plan's Justification for Management Action suggests that FWS has an insufficient and / or largely incorrect understanding of the
impacts of feral and free - roaming
cats on native
wildlife and the environment.
«Finally,» Cuomo concluded, «the return of feral
cats to the wild must be balanced against the
impacts these
cats can have
on wildlife,» which
impacts are most limited if feral
cats are not reproducing, including rapidly breeding back up to the carrying capacity of habitats from which
cats have been removed and killed.
Wildlife biologists have clearly documented the
impact of feral
cats on the environment, and feral
cat run - ins with
wildlife include competition, predation, and disease transmission.
The letter expressed strong opposition to free - roaming
cats within the U.S. «due to the adverse
impacts of these non-native predators
on federally listed threatened and endangered species, migratory birds, and other vulnerable native
wildlife.»
Complaining of the
impacts of free - roaming
cats on wildlife and the environment, along with a range of public health threats, dozens of veterinarians in Hillsborough County, Florida, have banded together to fight TNR.
By far the biggest
impact on native
wildlife is humans not
cats.
While these
cats become part of the natural ecosystem, often reducing the rodent population in our neighborhoods, they can also have a negative
impact on native
wildlife and songbirds.
Negatively
impacting the environment thru the spread of disease and
wildlife predation, the
cats themselves suffer
on the street.
«KittyCam» Reveals High Levels of
Wildlife Being Killed by Outdoor
Cats (2012) I suppose it's no surprise that HAHF would cite Loyd's overhyped «KittyCam» study as evidence of the impact of cats on wildl
Cats (2012) I suppose it's no surprise that HAHF would cite Loyd's overhyped «KittyCam» study as evidence of the
impact of
cats on wildl
cats on wildlife.
Due to their adverse
impact on wildlife, the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation commission does not issue permits to make lawful either the release of
cats to the wild or the establishment of feral / free - roaming
cat colonies.
If, as Schroeder claims, there are «well - documented
impacts of
cat predation
on wildlife,» how could an increase in the population of
cats possibly be a benefit?
Compound Errors Clearly, these errors are substantial — in some cases, doubling the apparent
impact of
cats on wildlife.
They want to learn what threats free - ranging
cats face and what their
impact is
on the area's
wildlife.
Do these «part - timers» have the same
impact on wildlife as feral
cats?
In urban areas in particular,
cats are one of the most common avian predators (Sims et al. 2008), but their total
impact on wildlife is difficult to estimate and varies greatly between studies (Fitzgerald and Turner 2000) and with study methodology (Krauze - Gryz et al. 2012a).
Here, I'll focus
on how feral
cat / TNR researchers often misuse averages to characterize skewed distributions, and how that error overestimates the
impact of free - roaming
cats on wildlife.
The evidence of the strong
impact of
cats on wildlife has focused the attention of conservation biologists towards possible methods of reducing that pressure.
While
cats do not belong outdoors for their own safety and outdoor
cats have a negative
impact on the
wildlife and environment, we live in a world where
cats are let outside every day.
Finally, the return of feral
cats to the wild must be balanced against the
impacts these
cats can have
on wildlife, including
on threatened and endangered species, habitats, and food sources for native predators.»
Additionally, the number of
cats impounded by shelters in most communities is far too low to have any meaningful
impact on the daily risk of disease, injury or
wildlife predation by
cats.
In recent years, concerns have been raised about what
impact outdoor
cats might have
on wildlife populations.
Although the actual
impacts of community and pet
cats on wildlife are hotly debated, one fact is clear: the capacities of most shelter programs are simply insufficient to decrease the overall number of outdoor
cats in a community.
A similar situation occurs in North American cities and countrysides, where coyotes vastly reduce the
impact of outdoor
cats on wildlife.
In Washington, D.C., for example, the City Paper (September 15, 2015) reported
on a controversial, regressive
wildlife plan proposed by a city agency: ``... Washington Humane Society's vice president of external affairs, Scott Giacoppo, wrote that the
Wildlife Action Plan as proposed «would result in the rounding up and killing of feral
cats — essentially a reversal back to the animal policies of the 1800s that were ultimately proven to have no
impact on the population at all.
Cats also have a profound
impact on wildlife, particularly bird populations.
Now, if, as Schroeder claims, there are «well - documented
impacts of
cat predation
on wildlife,» how could the inevitable increase in the free - roaming
cat population possibly be a benefit?
No TNR + No Feeding = More
Cats — But That's OK In the 22 months since launching this blog, I've been at pains to expose the flimsy nature of most complaints regarding the alleged impacts of free - roaming cats on wildlife and the environm
Cats — But That's OK In the 22 months since launching this blog, I've been at pains to expose the flimsy nature of most complaints regarding the alleged
impacts of free - roaming
cats on wildlife and the environm
cats on wildlife and the environment.
My copy of Patronek's 1998 article, «Free - roaming and feral
cats — their
impact on wildlife and human beings,» published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine Association (JAVMA), is becoming rather shabby, as I continue making notes in the margins and covering it with a rainbow assortment of highlighter.
Very few scientific papers receive the kind of press coverage that's been given «The
impact of free - ranging domestic
cats on wildlife of the United States,» published in the online journal Nature Communications.
Be prepared for the next news story, media release, position statement, local ordinance, House or Senate bill, or government report that (intentionally or not) misrepresents free - roaming
cats»
impact on wildlife and the environment, public health threat, etc. with Feral
Cat Witch - hunt Bingo!
In a 2011 paper published in the Journal of
Wildlife Management, Jeff Horn and his co-authors estimate the home range of owned and unowned
cats, arguing that «greater activity levels and ranging behavior suggest unowned
cats have a greater potential
impact on wildlife than do owned
cats.»
Patronek, G.J., «Free - roaming and feral
cats — their
impact on wildlife and human beings.»
American Bird Conservancy Concerned about the
impact of
cats on birds & other
wildlife in your local park or community?
Instead of listening to ABC, who provide no evidence that
cats are having a negative
impact on the District's
wildlife or habitats, the DDOE should look to the Washington Humane Society for guidance.
Additional Evidence Many researchers have disputed the kind of broad, overreaching claims Lebbin et al. make about the
impact of
cats on bird population (and
wildlife in general).
In the ongoing and polarized dialogue concerning the
impact cats have
on wildlife, detractors often argue there is not enough scientific data to prove that TNR works.
Nevertheless, they persist — grossly misrepresenting the
impacts of
cats on wildlife and public health in order to drum up support.
I am really concerned about the
impact of feral
cats on native
wildlife in Australia.