I think it would be very bad to wait for an ecological
catastrophe as a trigger.
Not exact matches
When ecosystems are lost,
as they have been through felling of forests and conversion of landscape to agriculture on a vast scale, havoc ensues,
triggering human and natural
catastrophe on an unprecedented scale.
Blakelock's
catastrophe, Tomiewicz and her colleagues believe, was probably
triggered in part by his use of a synthetic pigment known
as Van Dyke brown.
Since methane is a greenhouse gas 25 times
as potent
as carbon dioxide, such a scenario would
trigger a «climate
catastrophe», they say, increasing the methane content of the planet's atmosphere twelve-fold, and raising temperatures by 1.3 ˚C.
The game features: • Stunning visuals of the Earth heating - up and facing various disasters • Unleash varying
catastrophes that could destroy the Earth by
triggering domino effects, including earthquakes, tsunamis, cyclones, wildfires, draught diseases and more • Invest in wide array of profitable and carbon intensive industries, such
as oil, auto manufacturing, housing developments, and more • Reality - based events to provide a deep level of simulation • Several different potential scenarios with three difficulty levels each to explore • Various strategy combinations to win the game
The fact that CO2 has been almost twenty times higher in the past, for millions of years at a time without
triggering a
catastrophe is completely ignored due to the cognitive dissonance of the true believers in Al Gore's movie fantasies —
as is everything else that can be explained by natural climate variability.
The implicit value system of «
catastrophe», a powerful side topic worthy of whole bodies of work surely can't be lightly entered into under the terms of their paper; yet no, they use that example
as a guidance
trigger phrase for qualifying
as: