The consensus regarding
the catastrophic global warming hypothesis is completely reliant on a proposed positive feedback producing runaway global warming that will destroy human civilization.
Velasco is one of many scientists who question the conclusions of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a political body which has been the primary force behind the promotion of
the catastrophic global warming hypothesis.
Not exact matches
The AGW
hypothesis is that human emissions of CO2 will lead to
catastrophic global warming, disappearing sea ice, rising sea levels, and numerous other
catastrophic events.
Scientists proposing
catastrophic majority anthropogenic
global warming models (a.k.a. «Climate change») bear the burden of proof of providing clear robust evidence supporting validated model predictions of anthropogenic
warming with strong significant differences from this climatic null
hypothesis.
However, when comparing model outputs against Hurst climate persistence, I find that the
catastrophic majority anthropogenic
global warming hypothesis to be formally «Not Proven» per Bray (2005), and Johnson (2013).
Their campaign depends on maintaining their fantasy world, which they do by defending their
catastrophic anthropocentric
global warming (CAGW)
hypothesis, claiming that failure to reduce CO2 emissions will result in various climate / extreme weather catastrophes.
The enduring myth of «accelerating» is a leftover from earlier IPCC climate reports and the original AGW
hypothesis that speculated greater levels of atmospheric CO2 would generate «runaway»
global warming leading to a
catastrophic «tipping point» climate change.
Nevertheless,
global warming hypotheses have been narrowed in the press and public debate to a «consensus» view of
catastrophic global warming in a political world that prizes agreement and confidence over exploration, and a media that thrives on crisis.
The
catastrophic anthropogenic (i.e. man - made)
global warming (CAGW)
hypothesis has four components.
Without that correlation, the high sensitivity water vapour feedback driven
catastrophic anthropogenic
global warming hypothesis is effectively dead in the water.
One of the major tenets of the anthropogenic
hypothesis of
global warming is that the number of extremely hot days would increase, potentially causing
catastrophic loss of life.
The orthodox anthropogenic
hypothesis of
catastrophic global warming that much of high - level governmental policy - making is based on, is for all practical purposes, invalidated.