While it's not as widely known what caused the planet's destruction, it's usually some combination of
catastrophic natural causes, depending on the era.
Not exact matches
The recognition that economic growth has
caused natural disasters and is leading toward far more
catastrophic ones has had a different kind of effect.
The research by hydrologists and land - use experts at Rice University and Texas A&M University at Galveston was published in the journal
Natural Hazards Review just days before Hurricane / Tropical Storm Harvey inundated the Houston region and
caused some of the most
catastrophic flooding in U.S. history.
Issue: 23 U.S.C. 125 authorizes an Emergency Relief (ER) program for the repair or reconstruction of Federal - aid highways and of roads on Federal lands that have suffered serious damage as a result of
natural disasters or
catastrophic failures from an external
cause.
Despite the climate alarmists» misplaced concerns about the alleged risk of
catastrophic human -
caused climate change, the Earth has long had very effective
natural systems to control excessively high temperatures.
How about one compare
catastrophic outcomes of
natural causes and human
caused.
Even if
natural gas combustion creates approaching 50 percent less CO2 equivalent per unit of energy produced, an amount which is well beyond best case on ghg emission reductions, it will not create the much greater emissions reductions necessary in the next 30 years to give any hope of limiting warming from exceeding levels that will
cause catastrophic impacts.
We must see climate change as an ethical problem because: (a) it is a problem
caused by some people in one part of the world that puts others and the
natural resources on which they depend at great risk, (b) the harms to these other people are not mere inconveniences but in some cases
catastrophic losses of life or the ability to sustain life, and (c) those who are vulnerable to climate change cant petition their governments to act to protect themselves but must rely upon a hope that a sense of justice and responsibility of those
causing the problem will motivate them to change their behavior.
if you will argue with me on my results that we did not see anything
catastrophic happening around 1972, when we also had a standstill, in the speed of warming, I would agree with that but remember this was at the height of warming
causing more
natural clouds and moisture.
Warming to date, even if not exaggerated and all attributed to man - made and not
natural causes, is consistent with far less
catastrophic, and more incremental, future warming numbers.
E.g., research assumes greenhouse gas emissions
cause warming without explicitly stating humans are the
cause»... carbon sequestration in soil is important for mitigating global climate change» (4a) No position Does not address or mention the
cause of global warming (4b) Uncertain Expresses position that human's role on recent global warming is uncertain / undefined «While the extent of human - induced global warming is inconclusive...» (5) Implicit rejection Implies humans have had a minimal impact on global warming without saying so explicitly E.g., proposing a
natural mechanism is the main
cause of global warming»... anywhere from a major portion to all of the warming of the 20th century could plausibly result from
natural causes according to these results» (6) Explicit rejection without quantification Explicitly minimizes or rejects that humans are
causing global warming»... the global temperature record provides little support for the
catastrophic view of the greenhouse effect» (7) Explicit rejection with quantification Explicitly states that humans are
causing less than half of global warming «The human contribution to the CO2 content in the atmosphere and the increase in temperature is negligible in comparison with other sources of carbon dioxide emission»»
Peter Whale says: August 14, 2010 at 11:25 am Could someone on either side of the debate give me what weather conditions over an agreed period of time, that would then turn the observations so that they could be called climate, which would then either confirm
catastrophic warming or confirm
natural cause and variation =======================================================
Could someone on either side of the debate give me what weather conditions over an agreed period of time, that would then turn the observations so that they could be called climate, which would then either confirm
catastrophic warming or confirm
natural cause and variation.
He has defended cases involving a
natural gas fire at a compression station,
catastrophic injuries
caused by a broken leaf spring from a tractor - trailer, and brain damage
caused by a wayward trailer that detached from its towing vehicle.