They are meeting to try and agree to a global legally binding climate treaty to keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius, which is the agreed upon target that scientists say the world can not exceed if we are to avoid
catastrophic runaway climate change.
Not exact matches
Leading
climate scientists believe that maintaining carbon dioxide levels in excess of 350 ppm will result in
runaway global warming with
catastrophic impacts to humans, wildlife and ecosystems.
-- > a coming Ice Age — > global warming — > anthropogenic global warming — >
runaway global warming — >
climate change — > disastrous
climate change — > a «warming hiatus» (currently)-- > irreversible and
catastrophic climate changes (the future)
We can only hope that
climate change is not going to be like a
runaway train accelerating down - grade to some
catastrophic end.
that cloud response to warming acts similarly to the eye's iris, opening to let more heat radiate out to space as temperature rises and closing to hold more heat in as temperature falls, and generally supports the understanding that Earth's
climate is self - regulating and therefore not prone to a «tipping point» or a «
runaway greenhouse effect» or «
catastrophic warming.»..
What they are practicing is not science, it is propaganda based on an unsupportable
catastrophic AGW agenda designed to convince the public that a rise in a tiny trace gas comprising only 0.00038 of the atmosphere will cause
runaway global warming and
climate catastrophe.
The cumulative CO2 growth causes global warming that accelerates (they hypothesize) to a condition of «
runaway» temperature increases via positive feedbacks, leading to
catastrophic «tipping point»
climate change.
Then this type of anti-science insanity preached by the
climate modelers would finally be D.O.A., never again to poison a public scientific debate with «
runaway»
catastrophic climate absurdities.
The enduring myth of «accelerating» is a leftover from earlier IPCC
climate reports and the original AGW hypothesis that speculated greater levels of atmospheric CO2 would generate «
runaway» global warming leading to a
catastrophic «tipping point»
climate change.
The problem arises because
climate alarmist prefer to assume there are only positive feedback mechanisms in play with increasing CO2 emissions such that we will have
runaway temperatures and
catastrophic climate outcomes.
Candidates who are
climate thinkers will conclude that man - made warming is mild and manageable, not
runaway and
catastrophic.
Worm greenhouse emissions (primarily methane) from our global ocean sediment buddies could lead to that proverbial tipping point - initiating a
runaway global warming and
catastrophic climate change scenario.
Worse, around 1970 highly simplified computer models raised the specter of a
catastrophic climate runaway.