Sentences with phrase «catastrophic warming models»

Over the last decade, when climate alarmists began running their catastrophic warming models backwards, they found they vastly over-predicted past warming.

Either way, the main point is that the IPCC catastrophic warming models due to increased anthropogenic CO2 are just not credible.

Not exact matches

Despite the «science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global - warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.

I said that I'm skeptical that it can be implemented fast enough to address the mitigation piece of the problem before we are committed to catastrophic levels of warming; and that there seem to me to be problems with model in terms of human behavior.

Christy, a noted skeptic of catastrophic man - made global warming, said his results reinforce his claim that climate models predict too much warming in the troposphere, the lowest five miles of the atmosphere.

Scientists proposing catastrophic majority anthropogenic global warming models (a.k.a. «Climate change») bear the burden of proof of providing clear robust evidence supporting validated model predictions of anthropogenic warming with strong significant differences from this climatic null hypothesis.

However, when comparing model outputs against Hurst climate persistence, I find that the catastrophic majority anthropogenic global warming hypothesis to be formally «Not Proven» per Bray (2005), and Johnson (2013).

The plan they came up with was to announce that (computer model - generated) predictions of sea ice decline due to (computer model - generated) predictions of human - caused global warming are so catastrophic that polar bears should be returned to their previous «vulnerable» classification, despite the fact that by all other criteria they are flourishing.

As Robert Pindyck demonstrates, the climate models projecting future warming and associated environmental impacts are crippled by what we don't know about a host of things, including — most importantly — the feedback loops that might produce catastrophic outcomes.

The best that can be said for the catastrophist side is that there is at least some evidence that future warming or changes in sea level or ocean chemistry could be catastrophic, even though this evidence is far from conclusive and is actively contradicting most models that predict catastrophe at present.

Andrew Dobbs writes «Because you don't need computer models to examine global warming, catastrophic or not, and the idea that GCMs are absolutely essential to the AGW case is a strawman that is endlessly repeated on many «skeptic» blogs.»

Not only have temperatures stagnated over the past 18 to 20 years — interrupted by a strong, naturally occurring El Niño — but computer models suggesting catastrophic global warming have continually overestimated global temperatures when compared with actual, real - world data.

Because you don't need computer models to examine global warming, catastrophic or not, and the idea that GCMs are absolutely essential to the AGW case is a strawman that is endlessly repeated on many «skeptic» blogs.

I don't have much doubt that there has been some mild warming due to AGW, but I think that there are many claims of * possible * catastrophic outcomes (based on sketchy models) that pose as * probable * outcomes and consensus science.

The «consensus» «experts» and billion dollar computer climate models predicted that human CO2 emissions would generate accelerating, catastrophic global warming.

In the face of Zwally's analysis, defenders of the CO2 warming meme retreated to stressing uncontested observations of lost ice due to dynamic glacier thinning or uncritically accepting speculative models of catastrophic deglaciation.

According to the IPCC and its computer models, without enormous emission cuts the world is set to get between two and six degrees warmer during the 21st Century, with catastrophic consequences.

There is potential bad news: The models suggest there will be catastrophic warming in the next century.

It took nearly no time to adjust from a catastrophic global cooling model to a catastrophic global warming model.

No quantitative model that fits recent data predicts catastrophic warming over the rest of the century.

Based on land - surface temperatures, Africa does not appear to be affected by the «unprecedented» global warming due to the «unprecedented» global CO2 levels, which represents a catastrophic prediction failure by the IPPC and its climate models.

The main evidence for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), the principal alleged adverse effect of human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), is climate models built by CAGW supporters in a field where models with real predictive power do not exist and can not be built with any demonstrable accuracy beyond a week or two because climate and weather are coupled non-linear chaotic systems.

But you say you can model catastrophic global warming on the horizon, even though the more logical hysteria should be about the pending cooling that is without question inevitable and our near term destiny.

Those catastrophic climate predictions of doomsday that proponents of human - made global warming rely are based on massive, complex, costly computer climate models - also know as simulations and virtual climate reality.

as temperatures have declined and climate models have failed to predict this decline, the IPCC has gained confidence in catastrophic warming and dismisses the pause as unpredictable climate variability

I have been arguing that the climate models are inadequate and that a catastrophic abrupt warming is inevitable, but I too am being scorned!

All of the models predict that the globe will warm as the result of the unrestrained emission of heat trapping gases, but different temperatures are obtained under the same conditions and both modest and catastrophic climate changes are foreseen.

The main evidence for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), the principal alleged adverse effect of human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), is climate models built -LSB-...]