Sentences with phrase «category average of»

Measuring 335 nits on ourlight meter, the Blackphone's screen is dimmer than that of the Alpha (371 nits) as well as the iPhone 6 (504 nits), not to mention the category average of 368 nits.

That's speedier than both the Y900 at 3:10 and the category average of 3:20.

That's miles off from the smartphone category average of 15,695, and even behind the scores posted by the Galaxy J3 (4,309) and the Moto E (4,492), which aren't exactly powerhouses.

The Galaxy S9 +'s runtime is comfortably ahead of the smartphone category average of 9 hours and 50 minutes.

The notebook earned a score of 52,374 on the 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited graphics benchmark, just surpassing the category average of 51,412.

On the Geekbench 3 overall performance test, the ZenBook Flip notched a score of 4,804, falling below the ultraportable category average of 5,457.

That's far below the category average of 2,728, but much better than the Fire 7 Kids Edition, which notched 1,174.

That's a little below the tablet category average of 97 percent, but really quite strong overall, especially considering the price.

That's nearly double the category average of 4 hours and 14 minutes and well ahead of the HP ZBook 15's time (3:31).

It's on the slow side compared to the Fire HD 8 Kids Edition, and well below the tablet category average of 2,728.

The Fire 7 Kids Edition can display 75.4 percent of the color gamut, which is well below the category average of 90.4 percent.

The fund's yields was higher than the category average of 9.44 percent during the same period.

This shows that the fund's yields were lower than the category average of 11.61 percent during the same period.

The fund has beaten the category average of 10.75 percent for the same period.

This ETF's expense ratio is the lowest in the group but, at 0.5 %, it is still above the small - blend category average of 0.38 %.

The five - year average annualized return of 6.17 % trailed the category average of 9.03 %, however, trading at $ 15.61 in mid-April 2016.

The fund's expense ratio is 0.6 %, well above the small - blend category average of 0.38 %.

The five - year average annualized return is 7.03 %, below the category average 8.53 %, but its 6.55 % one - month return in mid-April 2016 bested the category average of 4.78 %.

This ETF carries the highest expense ratio among micro-cap ETFs, 0.94 % versus Morningstar's small value category average of just 0.36 %.

The fund has low standard deviation amongst its peers at 1.75 against category average of 1.99.

The fund has low standard deviation amongst its peer at 1.63 against category average of 1.99.

The fund's Sortino ratio is 7.73 against category average of 5.39 thereby indicating that the fund has lower probability of downside deviation.

While the fund's mean return is higher than the category mean its Sortino ratio at 4.43 is lower than the category average of 5.39.

The fund manager seeks to maintain a balanced portfolio with beta of 0.93 against category average of 0.94 thereby indicating that the fund's performance is generally balanced and is not directly determined to the market performance.

The fund's mean return is higher than the category mean at 10.82 % against average of 9.85 % and also has better Sortino ratio at 2.73 is higher than category average of 1.84 thereby indicating that the fund has better downside capture.

The one - year return for AMZA is negative 1.2 %, underperforming the category average of 4.37 %.

Its expense ratio of.014 % is a 70 % discount to the category average of.051 %.

On Geekbench 3, which measures overall performance, the Fire scored 1,158, which is pretty far below the category average of 2,481.

That bests the category average of 8,357 and blows away the Kyros (3,362), Genesis Prime (2,684), D2 Pad (3,378) and the ASUS MeMO Pad 7's score of 3,992.

On PCMark 7, a synthetic benchmark that measures overall performance, the Tablet 2 scored a modest 1,428, less than half the tablet category average of 3,488, but on par with other Atom - powered Windows 8 tablets such as the HP Envy x2 (1,428), the Dell Latitude 10 (1,440) and the Acer Iconia W510 (1,305).

That couldn't beat the Air's 2,694, but it does beat the Note 10.1's score of 2,516 and the category average of 1,489.

That is less than half the category average of 7,996, and less than the Coby Kyros» score of 3,632.

That's a rate of 25.3 MBps, slightly below the tablet category average of 27.7 MB ps, but better than the Acer Iconia W3 - 810 (21.9 MBps), Dell Latitude 10 (22 MBps) and Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet (20.7 MBps).

At 259 lux, the A1000's display is dimmer than the category average of 368, as well as the brightness on the Slate 7 (313), MeMO Pad 7 (358) and Sero 7 Pro (369).

During our VidTrim benchmark, the A1000 transcoded a 1080p video to 480p in 11 minutes and 31 seconds, which is far slower than the category average of 7:41.

Its LAPTOP Battery Efficiency Rating of 31 is worse than the category average of 19.8 (lower is better), and way behind the original X200 tablet's rating of 13.9.

That's more than twice as fast as the category average of 2:23.

This was ahead HP Pavilion x360's 3,248 (2.17 - GHz Intel Pentium N3520), but behind the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 2 11's 3,348 (also Intel N3520), and the category average of 4,154.

However, color accuracy was below average, as the Inspiron 11 3000's Delta - E rating of 9.3 (closer to 0 is better) was worse than the HP Pavilion (7.4), the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 2 11 (6.6) and the category average of 6.1.

This surpasses the tablet category average of 62 MBps, but isn't quite as fast as the Samsung ATIV Smart PC Pro 700T, which copied the same files at a blazing 170 MBps.

The Excite 13's brightness of 241 lux fell well below the category average of 359, as well as other leading 10 - inch tablets such as the TF 300 (331 lux) and the iPad (386).

The Encore 2 registered a rating of 10.1, significantly higher than the category average of 5.4 and the Aspire Switch 10's near - perfect rating of 1.

At least this slate surpassed the tablet category average of 2,813, but only by a hair.

That's a rate of 17.7 MBps, which is well below the category average of 53.8 MBps.

At 344 lux, the Write failed to meet the tablet category average of 367 lux.

That's higher than the category average of 355 lux, and even the iPad's 386 lux rating.

It posted a score of 7,532 on An3DBench, outstripping the category average of 7,299.

The device took 11 minutes and 6 seconds to transcode a 230 MB 1080p video to 480p using Vidtrim, beating the tablet category average of 11:31.

That's far lower than the category average of 17,839.

The 101 XS» Benchmark CPU score of 4,009 is about 400 points higher than the ASUS TF300 (3,613) and 1,200 points higher than the category average of 2,836 and the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (2,834).