And while a defect in design is
a cause for a product liability lawsuit, it may be difficult for Pa personal injury lawyers to bring such lawsuits, absent any real injury.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential
for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences
for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals
for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand
for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price
for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate
for our additional capital needs or
for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential
product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions
for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Other industries have already figured out how to handle
liability for products that can
cause harm
Many factors could
cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements, including, without limitation: BlackBerry's ability to enhance its current
products and services, or develop new
products and services in a timely manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new
product introductions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to mitigate the impact of the anticipated decline in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic developments in Venezuela and the impact of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating to network disruptions and other business interruptions, including costs, potential
liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to implement and to realize the anticipated benefits of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to intellectual property rights; BlackBerry's ability to expand and manage BlackBerry ® World ™; risks related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of confidential and personal information; BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers of functional components
for its
products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to government regulations, including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third - party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third - party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities in BlackBerry's
products; risks related to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders; government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short
product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry.
If science can nail climate change as a probable
cause of deadly weather events, like the heatwave that hit Europe in the summer of 2003, then global warming becomes a matter
for product liability law.
If a defect in a
product is found to have been a
cause of a child's flame - burn injury, the manufacturer of the
product and anyone in the chain of the
product's distribution may be found liable
for the injuries suffered by the child in a
product -
liability action.
Product liability refers to the liability of any or all parties along the chain of manufacture of any product for damage caused by that p
Product liability refers to the
liability of any or all parties along the chain of manufacture of any
product for damage caused by that p
product for damage
caused by that
productproduct.
We fight
for the rights of those who are the victims of personal injury, wrongful death, slip and fall, dog and other animal bites, car accidents, tractor trailer accidents, pedestrian injuries, medical malpractice claims, drug claims, healthcare injuries, nursing home abuse and neglect, Workmen's Compensation, Social Security disability, defective
product /
product liability, and consumer class action
causes / consumer fraud.
Product liability for medications that
cause injury is also known as pharmaceutical litigation when the manufacturer produces a defective drug.
However, when the SUV rollover accident was
caused by a
product defect, then the case is governed by strict
liability, meaning that the manufacturer is responsible
for the damages their
product caused regardless of whether they were at fault or not.
In other work, Henning Moelle has been acting as international lead counsel
for the pharmaceutical company Grünenthal in
product liability claims
for alleged birth defects
caused by thalidomide.
If a defective door latch has
caused you or a loved one to sustain injuries and other damages in an accident, it is highly recommended that you get in touch with an experienced
product liability attorney
for legal assistance.
If you or a loved one are seriously harmed following over-exposure, you may have
cause to file a
product liability lawsuit and seek compensation
for all of you damages.
A
products liability suit is a lawsuit brought against the seller of a
product for selling a defective
product that
caused physical injury to a consumer or user.
Even the largest and most influential pharmaceutical and medical
product makers are not immune to
liability under our civil justice system and must be held accountable
for the harm
caused.
Our litigation and trial lawyers are experienced with the common and statutory laws involving the prospective
liability of manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of
products to purchasers, users, and bystanders
for personal injury and property damage
caused by alleged defects in those
products.
If your injury was
caused by a defect in the design or manufacturing process, then the person or company responsible
for the defect may be liable to compensate you
for your injuries through a
product liability claim.
In the absence of expert testimony, there was no triable issue of material fact as to whether a defect in the speed control deactivation switch installed on a pickup truck was the proximate
cause of a fire that damaged a brake shop, a federal court in Mississippi ruled, granting the pickup truck maker's motions
for summary judgment on the business owner's
products liability and negligence claims (the latter of which was subsumed by the
products liability claim), and on the punitive damages claim (Mildemont, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., January 13, 2017, Ozerden, H.).
Find out more about the ways an experienced Worcester
product liability lawyer can help you recover the compensation you need
for injuries
caused by dangerous or defective
products.
Advising on a GBP multi-million
product stewardship /
liability claim
for environmental damage
caused by the release of chemicals from a
product into the aquatic environment.
Although
products liability law has evolved from the days of «caveat emptor» (let the buyer beware) to the imposition in appropriate cases of «strict
liability,» under which manufacturers are responsible
for injuries
caused by their defective or unreasonably dangerous
products even if they were not negligent, the personal injury plaintiff still has a job to do.
If a defective
product is found to have been a
cause of a fetus's death, the manufacturer of the
product and anyone in the chain of the
product's distribution may be found liable in a
product -
liability action
for the fetus's death.
Such
liability can occur,
for example, if a
product, such as a car that is involved in a vehicle accident, contains a defect in manufacture or design and the defect is found to have been a
cause of a fetus's death.
Like those other modules, the new
products liability module uses data derived from court dockets to provide insights and show trends in areas such as case timing, resolutions, findings, and damages
for injuries
caused by
product defects.
South Carolina
product liability law refers to the
liability of any or all parties along the chain of manufacture of any
product for damage
caused by that
product.
«
Products Liability» is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those product
Products Liability» is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make
products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those product
products available to the public are held responsible
for the injuries those
productsproducts cause.
Product liability is an area of law in which product manufacturers, suppliers or retailers are held responsible for injuries or deaths caused by defective pr
Product liability is an area of law in which
product manufacturers, suppliers or retailers are held responsible for injuries or deaths caused by defective pr
product manufacturers, suppliers or retailers are held responsible
for injuries or deaths
caused by defective
products.
Product liability refers to the area of law in which the legal liability a manufacturer, distributor, supplier, retailer and others who introduce a defective product into the hands of a consumer are held responsible for injuries caused by those pr
Product liability refers to the area of law in which the legal
liability a manufacturer, distributor, supplier, retailer and others who introduce a defective
product into the hands of a consumer are held responsible for injuries caused by those pr
product into the hands of a consumer are held responsible
for injuries
caused by those
products.
If a design, manufacturing or labeling defect
caused or contributed to your injuries, we can help you file a
product liability lawsuit to recover compensation
for your medical bills and other damages.
For instance, an injury
caused by a defective piece of equipment would fall under
product liability law, allowing you to seek compensation from the 3rd - party equipment manufacturer.
Peter Ventura is a Massachusetts
products liability lawyer dedicated to helping Massachusetts residents who have suffered injuries
caused by defective auto parts recover compensation
for their damages.
Children's
product liability attorney Jeff Killino believes in holding negligent companies liable
for the harm they
cause consumers.
Our Boston, Massachusetts
products liability lawyers at Altman & Altman, LLP have over 50 years of experience helping injured men, woman, and children throughout Massachusetts obtain financial recovery
for their serious injuries or the deaths of family members
caused by defective or dangerous
products.
Hathaway filed suit against Cintas, asserting
causes of action
for negligence, breach of warranty, and
products liability.
When drug defects or a drug that is inherently dangerous
causes injury or death to the patient, the victim and his / her family may be able to sue
for Boston
products liability or wrongful death damages.
Plaintiff May Sue Manufacturer of Name - Brand Prescription Drug
for Injury Allegedly
Caused by Different Company's Generic Drug, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, February 28, 2013 Federal Statute Preempts State
Products Liability Lawsuit Over Asbestos Exposure, According to Supreme Court: Kurns v. Railroad Friction
Products Corp., Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, October 18, 2012
For example, if a defective
product you were using at work
caused your injury, you may have the right to make a
product liability claim.
A proposed class action against Whirlpool Canada LP was a «
product liability claim
for pure economic losses
for an allegedly negligently designed non-dangerous
product» that disclosed no plain and obvious
cause of action, an Ontario court ruled.
Damages
for injuries and deaths
caused by vehicle or vehicle safety equipment defects are brought as
product liability actions against the manufacturer, designer, suppliers, assemblers, and others involved in the production of the defective vehicle or equipment and its release to the market.
At HLM, we are bringing
product liability claims against talc manufacturers
for the harm they
cause women and their families.
Product liability actions seeking to recover damages
for motorcyclists» personal injuries or death are usually brought as strict
liability claims, which enable a plaintiff to establish the
liability of certain defendants without the necessity of proving that any of the defendants was negligent in creating the defective vehicle that
caused the motorcyclist's injury or death or in releasing it to the market.
When a defect in a motorcycle or other motor vehicle is determined to have been a
cause of a motorcyclist's injury or death, the manufacturer of the motorcycle or other vehicle as well as others in the chain of the vehicle's distribution may be held liable
for the motorcyclist's injury or death under
product liability law.
Napa Home & Garden, which sold fire pots and candle fuel, said mounting
liabilities from a
product recall and injuries allegedly
caused by one of its
products, forced the company to file
for bankruptcy on July 5 in Atlanta.
Maritime law observes a strict
liability standard with regards to
product liability claims and even provides
causes of action
for wrongful death that are available to non-seamen injured on the high seas.
With regard to
product liability cases (injuries
caused by defective or unsafe
products), manufacturers are in the best position to ensure the safety of their
products prior to putting them on the market, and as such, they can be held strictly liable
for any foreseeable injuries
caused by a defect or safety flaw.
«
Product liability» is a legal mechanism by which a consumer may recover compensation for injury to persons or property caused by a defective p
Product liability» is a legal mechanism by which a consumer may recover compensation
for injury to persons or property
caused by a defective
productproduct.
Depending upon the type of
product that
caused your injuries, you may be able to file a
product liability claim against the responsible party
for negligence, strict
liability, or breach of warranty.
Representing Grünenthal on the major
product liability case involving a claim
for damages in over $ 204m filed by the Spanish Association AVITE (Asociación de Víctimas de la Talidomida en España) representing 184 victims of thalidomide,
for alleged damages
caused in the 1960's
for the administration of thalidomide.
Anyone in the chain of a
product's distribution may be held liable in strict
liability for injuries
caused by a
product's defect.
In certain situations, such as a
product liability case, the law says that manufacturers should be held financially responsible
for injuries
caused by their
products, regardless of whether or not they acted negligently in designing or manufacturing the item.