Sentences with phrase «cause harm another person»

It will also provide compensation in the event that you cause harm another person or their property or have legal fees to pay an accident.

Not exact matches

Alcohol and cigarettes, which also «hook» people, destroy health and lives, and cause death and harm to those who don't use them (second - hand smoke, drunk driving, abused families) are legal, billion - dollar industries, and these drugs are available and consumed everywhere.
«A lot of times an employer does not do a pre-employment background check to simply weed out people that can cause the company harm,» Ramos says.
But first, people who build and program all forms of AI need to ensure their wiring prevents robots from causing more harm than good.
«So many people who love you feel so betrayed right now because they know the harm that Trump's policies cause, especially to people of color.
For example, some people will have a very strong inclination to dismiss any claims that marijuana may cause harm as nothing more than old - fashioned reefer madness.
The test, he says, is whether a natural or legal person had a duty that was violated by acting unreasonably, in a way that causes harm.
I would prefer that people leave it at this, «What two consenting adults do with one another that doesn't cause physical or financial harm to others, should be legal and they should be left alone.»
People like «Free Thinker» do more harm than good to their cause (I guess you'd call it that).
This is a pretty terrific article by Matt Lewis about the struggles of people at the lower end of the income distribution and how bad decisions in one's teens and twenties cause more long - term harm for those whose families have the least.
Maybe he is a good person, but he heads an organization that continues to hide horrendous crimes by priests and insists on policies that cause harm to millions.
The most hotly debated issue in connection with the 1983 Rules, in fact, was whether a lawyer should be required, rather than merely permitted, to disclose information he has reason to believe necessary to prevent a client from causing death or serious bodily harm to another person.
Why should I encourage people to follow beliefs that are demonstrably false and lead to actions that cause real world harm to others?
I am TRULY wondering what type of communication would cause this type of person to do the LEAST amount of harm to others.
History is full of examples of people causing harm to other people justified by their religious beliefs and their «personal knowledge» of what God wanted them to do.
People do not choose it for themselves and it often causes them harm.
People need to focus less on being offended by what someone else believes (especially when it really does no harm except causing some offense) and be more secure in their own beliefs.
US should do something about people who r using american land to launch provoking movies which is causing harm to US interest in the outside world.
We have learned that when we focus on the harms caused by religious hostility toward gay people — its destructive role in the lives of gay and lesbian Americans and explaining that being gay is not a lifestyle choice but is how you are born — persons of faith can understand why religion must no longer be misused to justify hostile attitudes and actions toward LGBT people.
«people who r using american land to launch provoking movies which is causing harm to US interest in the outside world.»
If, on the other hand, the fantasies are used as cause to harm others, or to stop people from seeking truth, then I pity those lost fools and I cry for humanity.
Its up to those in church leadership to weed out the bad ones that cause harm to people and if they do nt they will be held just as accountable as the guilty.
The usual technique used to bring about this pseudo-change involves helping gay persons internalize self - hatred, an approach that frequently causes great psychological harm and suffering.
Worse, in allying themselves with conservative interests, people at and near the bottom wind up supporting economic causes» privatization, low taxes, deregulation» that objectively do them harm.
I don't mind the remote chance that I may be sacrificing myself in exchange for staying out of other people's business that causes no harm anyway.
According to the 1951 convention, genocide involves an intention to wipe out a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group by killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the group's physical destruction, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children to another people group.
Morality is causing needless harm to other people.
If sin is defined as anything that harms persons, whatever the cause, then addiction most certainly involves sin].
fishon — you may have misunderstood ttm's comment — we say «committed» to a mental institution ie they got sent there, to a hospital — because they cracked up — he's not saying the church is a mental institution, but once who's pressure can cause people mental harm.
You have crazy people in a whirlwind of religious delusion, a fantasy world, who act out against other people — and causing real harm in the process.
«Rape and pedophilia (or at least pederasty) are both condemned in scripture by virtue of them causing harm to other people» (Trey)
The church abuses LGBTI people horribly, causing numerous harms to all aspects of health.
Because people think it does exist and those people are causing harm to those of us who don't believe.
Obviously, there are more than one person who has lost someone on 9 - 11, so show some respect and don't cause any more pain and harm than what has already occurred.
Why do we keep protecting religious people's rights to cause harm to others in the name of their God?
Let me state some principles that may help us mediate between the range of state action and the scope of individual choice: (1) The state should limit freedom of choice when the exercise of that choice will cause significant, irreparable or unnecessary harm to another person or persons.
What is more evil / selfish: A person who inadvertently causes harm to many around him / her because they are so wrapped up in self they can not see / do not care about the pain they cause or someone who purposefully chooses to cause harm to one person because it brings them pleasure?
(here it means that all the nations realized the tremendous potential for great harm can be caused by just a few people..
Whereas, people who intentionally contribute (by financial means or other) to the unrest in the Middle East in the hopes it will cause Israel to be attacked and bring about the prophecies of Revelation may actually be doing legitimate harm to humanity.
Beyond that there is always the fear of the end of the world or the fear of large groups of people who might want to cause harm, the stuck place of being stereotyped and all of that frustration.
Atheists would not care if not for the harm these peoples belief systems cause.
One day we will agree to disagree, different strokes for different folks... my choice is what I choose to do and if I'm causing no harm it shouldn't bother you... your choice is what you choose to be and if you're causing no harm then you're allright with me... Lay off the hate people, please.
Look at stem cell research for a fine example of how these peoples bronze age myths are causing harm today.
So catholics are free to be catholics, why can't people be free to be anti-catholic as long as they're not causing damage or physical harm?
So gays are free to be gay, why can't people be free to be anti-gay as long as they're not causing damage or physical harm?
Its the believers that have caused so much harm to people just for being who they are.
I find it helps to have people around me who I can trust to help me with this — where I have any blind spot with harm I might be causing to point that out in order to facilitate change or indeed when I have good that I bring that I have not been aware that I am doing.
There are people specially trained to help crazy folk like you... please go see one before you cause great harm to society.
i wonder Yes, but I was also including how people are willing to shun members of their own family, consider them sinful, block people from their rights, hinder medical research that could save millions of lives, and a host of other things that cause harm to people because they were led to believe that it will increase their chances of living forever in bliss.
This guy stated and probably meaning no harm the following: «They didn't know what caused gay people, dwarfs, or harelips, webbed toes or fingers, or the millions of others errors that can occur.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z