Not exact matches
The findings suggest that while the response of Antarctic summer
sea ice to human -
caused climate change may be
less dramatic than in the Arctic,
sea ice cover may have declined by as much as 14 % over the last 100 years.
Or that the current deep freeze in europe is
caused by
less sea ice etc..
My take is that the tug of war over what's
causing today's telegenic heat waves, floods, tempests — and even Arctic
sea -
ice retreats — distracts from the high confidence scientists have in the long - term (but
less sexy) picture: that more CO2 will lead to centuries of climate and coastal changes with big consequences for a growing human population (for better and worse in the short run, and likely mostly for the worse in the long run).
I've been criticized by some environmentalists in recent years for writing that the long - term picture (more CO2 = warmer world =
less ice = higher
seas and lots of climatic and ecological changes) is the only aspect of human -
caused global warming that is solidly established, and that efforts to link dramatic weather - related events to the human influence on climate could backfire should nature wiggle the other way for awhile.
Results showed the storm
caused the
sea ice to pass the previous record 10 days earlier in August than it would have otherwise, but only reduced the final September
ice extent by 150,000 square kilometers (almost 60,000 square miles),
less than a 5 percent difference.
Simple physics dictates that with
less sea ice there is magnified warming of the Arctic due to powerful albedo feedback; this in turn reduces the equator to pole temperature gradient which slows the jet stream winds
causing them to become more meridional; this combined with 4 % more water vapor in the atmosphere (compared to 3 decades ago) is leading to much more extremes in weather.
The study said
sea level rise,
caused by factors including a thaw of glaciers, averaged about 1.2 millimeters (0.05 inch) a year from 1901 - 90 —
less than past estimates — and leapt to 3 mm a year in the past two decades, apparently linked to a quickening thaw of
ice.
None of this excuses Carrington's distortion, but we shouldn't let that
cause us to miss the point and ignore the information that the graphs do show us: The Arctic
sea -
ice is melting at an increased rate and there is
less of it now than 10 or 15 years ago.
What I find difficult with the «other» paper that it is again an a-posteriors explanation (like cold European winters
caused by
less Arctic
sea ice in the preceding fall) and just one.
Second, the ocean near the melting
ice sheet drops because the smaller
ice - sheet mass has
less gravitational attraction for ocean water than before, and thus the water released from the former gravitational attraction of the
ice sheet
causes additional
sea - level rise far from the
ice sheet.
Nearly every alarmist publication that asserts
less sea ice causes polar bears to suffer from nutritional stress references as «proof» a 1999 paper by Ian Stirling showing body condition of bears in the western Hudson Bay declined from the 1980s to 1997.
And against the backdrop of all of this is the fact that man -
caused global climate change is making it all possible — now that there's
less ice in the Arctic, ships (and oil rigs) can more safely navigate the
seas.
We have probably all heard about ways that climate change will threaten Indigenous peoples — by
causing rising
sea levels,
less sea ice, and so on.