Not exact matches
Is there
dangerous, human -
caused global warming affecting the climate
of the continental U.S.?
It does not mean that human -
caused global warming is not potentially
dangerous... just read the published body
of research since 1842... or better yet talk to research scientists who are actively publishing in this like I talk to them weekly.
The study concluded that human emissions
of carbon dioxide (CO2)
cause dangerous global warming.
A human that
causes global warming is more
dangerous than natural
causes of global warming.
Much
of what they said meshed with the overall theme
of the meeting, which organizers said was aimed at proving that the recent consensus on
dangerous human -
caused global warming was shaped more by politics and passion than data.
The trigger was an e-mail chain maintained by Benny J. Peiser, a British social scientist who sends out daily summaries
of research questioning
dangerous human -
caused global warming and international climate treaties, along with other subjects.
Black carbon is the second largest
cause of global warming, and this bill will ensure that we have the information we need to address this
dangerous pollutant.»
It does not mean that human -
caused global warming is not potentially
dangerous... just read the published body
of research since 1842... or better yet talk to research scientists who are actively publishing in this like I talk to them weekly.
A central dispute was over how scientists can best discuss risks and responses related to inherent, and
dangerous, extremes
of climate in a world increasingly fixated on how to limit
global warming caused by human activity.
I am convinced next Monday there will be a newspaper explaining the cold and the snow was
caused by» extremely
dangerous human induced runaway
global warming as the driver
of climate change».
I regret deeply that the attacks on me now appear to have spilled over onto other scientists who have dared to question the degree to which human activities might be
causing dangerous global warming, a topic that ought rightly be the subject
of rigorous open debate, not personal attack.
How
dangerous it is to question the ruling paradigm
of human
caused global warming, a once interesting idea that the United Nations latched onto with all the enthusiasm
of a fox in a hen coop, simultaneously drawing the interest
of various national governments, and dragging with it many unwitting but eager scientifically credentialed sycophants.
But it is true that some
of the fossil - fuel funded groups that formerly argued that there is no
global warming have reacted to criticism by changing their argument to «the climate is always changing,» as if that somehow disproves the scientific consensus that human greenhouse - gas emissions are
causing dangerous warming.
That is decidedly not how this paper is used in public discourse though, I think in many instances this paper is used to say that not only do humans
cause global warming, but they are also the major
cause and the degree
of effect on nature / climate is in some way
dangerous and needs to be mitigated.
While the greenhouse effect is undeniably real, and while most scientists agree that there has been a rise in
global temperatures
caused in some part by human emissions
of carbon dioxide, no one knows how much more
warming will occur this century or whether it will be
dangerous.
For an increasing fraction
of the world's population, the real climate crisis is not the possibility that
dangerous human -
caused global warming may someday occur.
True believers in the theory
of man - made climate change can't understand how anyone can question the «overwhelming evidence» that mankind is
causing dangerous global warming.
The United States is needlessly penalizing itself and squandering its resource endowment, all because
of the big lie that carbon dioxide is
causing dangerous global warming.
This prescient statement merits careful examination by those who continue to assert the fashionable belief, in the face
of strong empirical evidence to the contrary, that human CO2 emissions are going to
cause dangerous global warming.
significant new peer - reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis
of dangerous human -
caused global warming. . .
Keep all this in mind when the President and other Washington politicos bring up «
dangerous manmade
global warming,» insist that we slash fossil fuel use, and tell us we need to give poor countries billions
of dollars a year to compensate them for «losses and damages» they incurred due to
warming we
caused.
I think actually that the tendency
of > scientists to insist that
global warming is real and
dangerous to convince > stubborn governments is the primary
cause of existence
of such radicals > like > McIntyre.
To fully understand the nature
of the harm
caused by this delay it is necessary to understand the policy implications
of a «carbon budget» that must limit
global emissions to avoid
dangerous warming levels..
Tim Ball was a student
of H.H. Lamb, who pioneered the modern study
of climate change before it was taken over by those promoting
dangerous global warming caused by carbon dioxide (CO2).
We agree that there are a lot
of scientists who seem to believe that humans are
causing dangerous global warming.
Although there is considerable scientific evidence that limiting
warming to 1.5 degrees C is necessary to prevent very
dangerous warming, a fact implicit in the recent Paris Agreement in which nations agreed to work to keep
warming as close as possible from exceeding 1.5 degrees C additional
warming, if the international community seeks to limit
warming to 2 degrees C it must assure that
global emissions do not exceed the number
of tons
of CO2 emissions that will raise atmospheric concentrations to levels that will
cause warming of 2 degrees C.
«Climate Change Reconsidered, the 2009 report
of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), is a comprehensive 880 - page tome that rigorously analyses the IPCC's claim that
dangerous global warming has «very likely» been
caused by human greenhouse emissions.
These climate scientists warned President Johnson in 1965 not just
of the dangers associated with human -
caused global warming, but also that we might eventually have to consider geoengineering the climate to offset that
warming and the risks that we're
causing by inadvertently running a
dangerous experiment with the Earth's climate.
From the administration that brought you «man -
caused disaster» and «overseas contingency operation,» another terminology change is in the pipeline.The White House wants the public to start using the term «
global climate disruption» in place
of «
global warming» — fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less
dangerous than it really is.
Proponents
of the CAGW gloom and doom disaster scenarios often say that we need to «connect the dots» to understand how CO2 emissions are
causing dangerous «accelerated»
global warming.
I was amazed at the Government and Green responses to the serious flooding in the English Midlands a couple
of years ago, when increassed rainfall due to alleged Man - made
Global Warming was trumpeted as a
cause for the flooding; anyone who pointed out that generations
of covering flood plains with buildings, concrete and ashphalt was quite a
dangerous thing to do was derided as a simpleton or an ignoramus.
Has two - decades worth
of cumulative CO2 growth in the atmosphere
caused the «experts»» predicted
dangerous and rapidly accelerating
global warming?
Despite the claims
of a handful
of crank scientists, the Washington Post, and a few big government tax and spend Republicans (Romney & Huntsman), the predicted
dangerous sea level increase from human -
caused global warming has not taken place.
CLIMATE change bedwetters love to trash Donald Trump for pulling out
of the failed Paris Climate Treaty designed to lower CO2 emissions that are apparently
causing dangerous global warming climate change.
The 1,018 - page report convincingly and systematically challenges IPCC claims that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are
causing «
dangerous»
global warming and climate change; that IPCC computer models can be relied on for alarming climate forecasts and scenarios; and that we need to take immediate, drastic action to prevent «unprecedented» climate and weather events that are no more frequent or unusual than what humans have had to adapt to and deal with for thousands
of years.
The letter casts doubt on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) «hypothesis
of dangerous human -
caused global warming», and argues that current climate change is within natural variations.
The claim is often made that climate realists (a.k.a. skeptics) can not point to peer - reviewed papers to support their position that there is no evidence
of «
dangerous global warming:»
caused by human emissions
of so - called «greenhouse» gases, including carbon dioxide.
From hazardous effects
causing potential loss
of life, injury, or other negative health impacts, to the potential exposure
of social, economic, and infrastructure assets to adverse impacts,
global warming places vulnerable human lives and systems in
dangerous jeopardy.
The conclusion
of the audit is that there is no scientific forecast supporting the widespread belief in
dangerous human -
caused «
global warming.»
First, Dr Rajendra Pachauri - chairman
of the official Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)- told a UN conference in Mauritius that the pollution which
causes global warming has reached «
dangerous» levels.
In stark contrast to the often repeated assertion that the science
of climate change is «settled,» significant new peer - reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis
of dangerous human -
caused global warming.
From Fox News From the administration that brought you «man -
caused disaster» and «overseas contingency operation,» another terminology change is in the pipeline.The White House wants the public to start using the term «
global climate disruption» in place
of «
global warming» — fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less
dangerous than -LSB-...]
The letter cast doubt on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) «hypothesis
of dangerous human -
caused global warming», and argued that current climate change is within natural variations.
Since it was published four years ago in a United Nations report, hundreds
of environmentalists, scientists and policy makers have used the hockey stick in presentations and brochures to make the case that human activity in the industrial era is
causing dangerous global warming.
In the comments, on Page 8 oldest - to - newest, Tom Harris
of the ICSC is still arguing that humans aren't
causing dangerous global warming anyway.
The Noble
Cause of Climate Change /
Global Warming / CAGW is as
dangerous as the anti-Semitism, anti-Black, anti-Protestant, anti-Catholic, ethnic tribalism
of the past.
It claims that passive smoking is no more
dangerous than «eating 50g
of mushrooms a week», and attacks «politically correct» beliefs such as «passive smoking
causes lung cancer» and «mankind's emissions
of carbon dioxide will result in runaway
global warming».
They appoint the members, control the data and fund most
of the research, mostly to prove the human -
caused dangerous global warming hypothesis.
«We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions
of carbon dioxide are
causing, or will in the foreseeable future
cause,
dangerous global warming.»