Sentences with phrase «caused by atheists»

So if I should take responsibility for events I did not partake in, it's only logical to make atheists realize just how much they deny about the evil caused by atheists.

Hugely more deaths have been cause by atheist dictatorships e.g. Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao.

Not exact matches

Politicians have used religion to advance their claims to just wars but in truth, they are not religious conflicts, just a facade created by atheists to avoid blame for the evil they cause.

So religion caused more deaths than the purges by atheists like Stalin or Mao?

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

As far as being a christian in the army, I can show you the chaos that is being caused by commanders who are christians and are forcing atheist to become christians or face the consequences.

Atheist reject the idea of a god and believe their view to be true or they would be agnostic unless they choose no stance at all of a god that of which would require unknowing of what the term «god» means so it would fall under a belief and since they can't prove that a god doesn't exist then by definition it requires faith for their view, meaning it would effect their view of the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe if a god was proven to be true.

Why aren't atheists ever swayed into belief by WLC's meanderings about his hypothetical «uncaused caused» (named god) which is made of nothing but poofed everything into existence from its nothingness?

The incredibly far - fetched postings here by the self - proclaimed religious folks are likely causing far more Americans to question their «faith» and beliefs» than anything we atheists could do on our own.

A new interview with Pope Francis by his friend Eugenio Scalfari (who is an atheist) that was just published in the paper La Repubblica is causing a major stir.

Please show me one comment comment by an atheist that says that only religion is the cause for every evil thing.

Most atheists will pick stories they know will make people enraged and will respond with emotion such as the flood or any other event caused by God.

Atheists think the universe was created by a catastrophic explosion with an unknown cause... unknown (and always will be if they can help it), because if they used scientific method (as logic and reason dictates), they would have to use the existence of an intelligent God as a variable in coming up with possibilities as to the outcome of their theory.

These people only differ from atheists on this subject by saying «God caused it to happen» where atheists would say «we have no idea why it happened».

Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?

Why don't you delusional automatons just practice your silly religious beliefs privately and quietly and stop subjecting us atheists to the collateral damage caused by the violence and destruction that is bred from the conflicts between all of your various different «faiths».

No sensible atheist would suggest that child abuse is caused by a belief in God.

Religion caused more deaths as atheists by FAR.

Billboards are expensive; the atheists could do much good — and get the attention they crave — by spending the money on a worthy cause instead of on this silly, childish nonsense.

Yeah atheists are causing trouble by making their beliefs known.

Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Benito Mussolini, Mao Zedong, Slobodan Milošević, NICOLAE CEAUSESCU... Atheists all... Just add up the deaths caused by Stalin and Chairman Mao... they dwarf the totals of the crusades and the inquisition and even the Spanish conquest of the New World... which had much more to do with gold than religion... but we will let it slide...

Shermer, editor of the magazine Skeptic, and himself an atheist, senses that these other writers are threatening their very cause by adopting styles of rhetoric which are hostile and condescending.

But when the Berrigan brothers made opposition to the Vietnam war a cause célèbre for the Catholic left, Wills began a journey that started with Bare Ruined Choirs (a book praising the Berrigans) and concluded with his appointment as the de facto lone Catholic voice on the secular - liberal New York Review of Books, where his articles jostle those by atheist Darwinians and defenders of Roe v. Wade.

Lets not forget the Crusades, the Nazi regime or the Boxer rebellion... next time you say atheist are promoting «violence», think about all the violence actually caused by religious beliefs...

The Big Bang Theory isn't just a theory that atheists / agnostics believe in; there are plenty of Christians (and I'm sure other religions) who believe that the Big Bang was caused by the Creator.

some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and mean to deceived others - those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach by the creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence fo the lord our God the reason we are here...

some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and mean to deceived others — those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach by the creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence of the lord our God the reason we are here...

it has been documented that only 7 % of all wars can be attributed to religious causes, as well, in this century alone more than 50million have been killed by atheists Mao / Stalin / Pol Pot»

«In recognising the distress caused to the society by our actions we have met with and apologised to The Atheist Society president and vice president.

It's a name that has caused considerable embarrassment to Peter Higgs, the physicist (and atheist) who postulated its existence — and by any reckoning the derogatory label might have been more appropriate, given the billions of dollars that have been spent chasing the elusive Higgs particle.

As for «causes and controls nature», the usual belief (based on blind faith) expressed by atheists is that this can only mean that a God causes everything to happen without any detectable physical process.

In particular, What if macroscopic evolution is not just another «a cultural consensus» imposed by like minded atheists / materialists who by definition preclude open science of testing it against the null hypothesis of known stochastic and chemical processes (as distinct from mutations causing microevolution)?

David L Hagan: What if macroscopic evolution is not just another «a cultural consensus» imposed by like minded atheists / materialists who by definition preclude open science of testing it against the null hypothesis of known stochastic and chemical processes (as distinct from mutations causing microevolution)?