The letter to the Environmental Protection Agency from Attorney General Scott Pruitt of Oklahoma carried a blunt accusation: Federal regulators were grossly overestimating the amount of air pollution
caused by energy companies drilling new natural gas wells in his state.
The Guardian: «Electricity prices spikes
caused by energy companies «gaming» the system, report finds» 2016/08/11, by Michael Slezak.
Not exact matches
Among the factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the
Company's control, including natural and other disasters or climate change affecting the operations of the
Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the
Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and
energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those
caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the
Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the
Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
That's
causing problems for a wind project that's been in development
by Avangrid Renewables, an international
energy company with wind farms in Herkimer and Lewis counties, for years.
That has posed a significant challenge for state regulators and
energy companies trying to determine if methane pollution was
caused by industry.
The laboratory spun off a
company, Spirae, and built a futuristic, computer - driven test bed that could simulate the operations of a large power grid and instantly adjust for power fluctuations
caused by the often fickle nature of renewable
energy.
«It's a difficult time at the moment, and the policy uncertainty is the main
cause of it,» said Shaq Mohajerani, an Australian spokesman for wind farm
company Union Fenosa, owned
by Spanish
energy giant Gas Natural.
But those incidental take permits usually span only about 5 - 10 years, and a condition of those permits is that for every eagle killed
by a wind turbine, the
energy company has to offset the loss
by ensuring birth of a new eagle somewhere else or prevent an eagle in another location from dying from other
causes.
Investing in the
energy sector can be riskier than other types of investment activities because of a range of factors, including price fluctuation
caused by real and perceived inflationary trends and political developments, and the cost assumed
by energy companies in complying with environmental safety regulations.
Given the financial stakes, it is little wonder that alternative -
energy companies, «green» investment firms, and biofuel producers are lobbying hard for more government largesse, and marketing their
cause directly to the public
by highlighting its supposed benefits for the environment,
energy security, and even employment — none of which withstand scrutiny.
DTE noted there's «a substantial capacity and
energy supply need beginning in 2022, primarily
caused by the
Company's projected retirements of River Rouge, St. Clair, and Trenton Channel power plants from 2020 - 2023.»
The Daily Mail has published a bombshell secret memo sent
by leading #ExxonKnew activist - lawyer Matt Pawa to billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer, outlining a strategy to bring state - level class action lawsuits against
energy companies and charging them with
causing global warming.
If that case it would only have been a matter of time before the U.S. or at least some U.S.
energy companies could have been sued for potentially any damage
caused by any extreme climate event worldwide.
I think this comes not especially from Individualism per se, but from smart campaigning
by oil and coal
companies, which realised that
by depicting climate change action as a left - wing, environmentalist, Egalitarian conspiracy, they could enlist anti-Egalitarians as unwitting foot soldiers in the
cause of enduring profitability for the incumbent
energy suppliers.
This untold chapter in Exxon's history, when one of the world's largest
energy companies worked to understand the damage
caused by fossil fuels, stems from an eight - month investigation
by InsideClimate News.
In the past, these IPCC reports have turned into a lightning rod for attacks
by organizations like the Heartland Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, who claim to tout freedom and liberty as their
cause, but enjoy big dollar sponsorship from coal and oil
companies like Koch Industries, Murray
Energy, and ExxonMobil.
Now, let's assume that the «right» amount of margin for a duel fuel
energy company is # 50, and then that the current October price was
caused by increases in wholesale costs, and the other actual rises.
In equally significant work, the team successfully defended the
energy supplier RWE in climate liability proceedings against allegations brought
by a Peruvian Andean resident that the
company had
caused the melting of a glacier in the Andes
by CO2 emissions.
A lawyer for Trans Mountain, a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan Canada, told a judge at hearings on the injunction application that the protesters» goal was to
cause so much financial harm through delays that the
company would be forced to abandon the $ 7.4 - billion project, which has been approved
by the National
Energy Board and the federal government.
Offshore wind farm — claim against a well — known
energy company arising out of disruption of fishing grounds
caused by the construction of an offshore wind farm.
• Reduced HVAC repair and maintenance cost
by 30 % per annum through implementation of vigilant and proactive preventive maintenance SOPs • Hand soldered a damaged electrical equipment component, saving the
company a cost of up till $ 12K in terms of machine replacement • Implemented
energy saving and cost effective power usage strategies which led to a reduction in the
company's annual operational costs
by 15 % • Timely identified and rectified a fault in blue print implementation, saving the client from a massive loss of cabling and installation expenses
caused by shot circuiting