Moscow - based cyber security firm Group IB said hackers had exploited code developed by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) which was leaked and then used in the WannaCry ransomware attack that
caused global disruption in May.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of
global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of
global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other
disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business
disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
The
global WannaCry cyber attack in May highlighted the vulnerability of medical systems when it
caused major
disruption to X-ray machines and other computer equipment in Britain's National Health Service, forcing hospitals to turn away patients.
Among the factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or climate change affecting the operations of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those
caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a
global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other
disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
The
global financial crisis
caused significant
disruption to financial markets and economic activity, albeit to a much lesser extent in Australia than in the north Atlantic economies.
While the
global economy supports our positive outlook, the risks of higher tariffs and possible trade
disruptions could
cause stocks to continue to be volatile in response.
Such a move is viewed as likely to
cause major
disruptions both in Europe and in
global financial markets.
«These are impressive results, particularly in light of the challenges posed by
global mega trends impacting our industry, from macroeconomic and political volatility, the continued rebalancing of the economic world, to shifting consumer preferences and increasing demand for healthier products, to the
disruption of retail
caused by the rapid growth of e-commerce and the blurring of channel lines,» Ms. Nooyi said.
Solar storms can
cause major
disruption to human civilization by crippling large electrical power grids,
global positioning systems (GPS), satellite operations and communications.
The latest version, more than a year in the making, reiterates findings that
global warming is unequivocal and primarily
caused by humans from the burning of fossil fuels, the clearing of forests, and the
disruption of agricultural activities.
Asteroid impacts that
cause global catastrophe are climate - changing events, and most of the resulting fatalities would be due to that change (which would
cause social
disruption that is expected to lead to starvation, disease and violence).
Those local
disruptions cause a domino effect through the
global atmosphere that can alter weather thousands of miles away.
Main results show that ice cap melt on Greenland and / or Antarctica injects fresh water into oceans near respective continents
causing rapid sea level rise and shuts down AMOC and / or SMOC leading to enormous
global climate
disruption, including massive storms.»
Deep economic and social inequalities, environmental degradation, biodiversity loss,
disruption caused by natural disasters and climate change are a litmus test for the
global community.
As the environmental effects of
global warming increase, the
disruption to the economy will be far worse than that
caused by banning the use of unnecessary transport.
During the 1950s, human -
caused disruptions of nature all the way up to
global destruction took on a veneer of scientific plausibility.
In the past few weeks there have been many newspaper and magazine articles that claim the weather in the month of December was absolute proof that climate change (or
global warming /
disruption) was already in effect and
causing most of the (bad) weather that happened in the month of December.
Yes, the simple term «
global warming» doesn't convey all the complexities of what can happen as that warming
causes air and ocean currents to shift, but climate change /
disruption provides even less information.
How much «climate
disruption»
global warming
causes, however, is a matter of legitimate scientific debate.
From «How much «climate
disruption»
global warming
causes, however, is a matter of legitimate scientific debate» to «totalitarians Trojan horse».
Most Popular Articles by this Author: (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author) American Energy Policy V — Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion The Link Between
Global Warming and Mega-Quakes - Reprise American Energy Policy Part II — Ammonia The Link Between Climate Change and Geological
Disruption: Can
Global Warming Be A
Cause of Earthquakes?
If the sun is primarily responsible for observed
global air temperature changes (even if heavily modulated by ocean behaviour as I contend elsewhere) then we need to know sooner rather than later otherwise a misdiagnosis of the
causes of climate change could
cause unimaginable
disruption and hardship through the imposition of incorrect remedies.
In this case, the strongest and best available data supports the proposition that humans are driving
global climate
disruption, that the
disruptions to the Earth's climate will continue to worsen this century, and the sooner we address the root
causes of climate
disruption, the better.
Energy security (this applies to the long term; e.g. years to decades, and most likely
caused by regional and
global disruptions to supply such as economic, trade, and military)
Amen to Hansen's calling on President Obama to personally and actively take up the
cause of climate science and to begin to speak in earnest about the threat posed by
global climatic
disruption.
But, expanding California's cap - and - trade program to enable polluters to buy REDD credits also harms Californians — overwhelmingly low - income communities and communities of color — those who live near the refineries, power plants, oil and gas extraction sites and other high - emission industries that are the main
cause of local and
global climate
disruption
I conclude that for the past 33 years there has been an increase of no more than 0,3 deg C, which would represent a «
global warming» trend of around 0.9 C per century, due to unknown factors related to the Sun, and surly nothing to warrant a huge economic
disruption caused by a fanatical U.S. war on carbon aimed at driving up the cost of conventional fuels aimed at unnecessarily reducing their consumption.
From the administration that brought you «man -
caused disaster» and «overseas contingency operation,» another terminology change is in the pipeline.The White House wants the public to start using the term «
global climate
disruption» in place of «
global warming» — fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.
Secretary Kerry has long paid attention to the concerns expressed by the leading climate scientists about human -
caused global climatic
disruption.
The report warned that poor and marginalized communities around the globe will be some of the first and hardest hit victims of climate change: «The poorest people in the world, who have had virtually nothing to do with
causing global warming, will be high on the list of victims as climate
disruptions intensify.»
There will be limits — probably very serious limits — to society's ability to adapt to the harmful consequences of human -
caused global climatic
disruption.
-LSB-...]
caused the California fires» of 2007, even if
Global Warming did fan the flames (see also Forest Chief Warns of
Global Warming threat) nor is possible to say that Moscow's clouded skies last year were due to Climate
Disruption -LSB-...]
From Fox News From the administration that brought you «man -
caused disaster» and «overseas contingency operation,» another terminology change is in the pipeline.The White House wants the public to start using the term «
global climate
disruption» in place of «
global warming» — fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than -LSB-...]
The letter requested that NASA in general and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in particular stop publishing the scientific conclusions about the human - driven
causes of
global climate
disruption.
RE: The Over-whelming scientific Consensus on man - made CO2
caused Global - warming - 97 % of the climate scientists surveyed believe «global aver temps have increased» during the past century [So do I]-- Your quotes: How «significant it is that 84 % of climate scientists have reached a «consensus» that «human - induced warming is occurring» «--RCB- 84 % «personally believe» [implies they may NOT have actually studied this topic — IE: may NOT be experts on this particular matter] human - induced warming is occurring -LCB--... — «In 1991 only 41 % of climate scientists were very confident that industrial emissions of greenhouse gases were responsible for climate disru
Global - warming - 97 % of the climate scientists surveyed believe «
global aver temps have increased» during the past century [So do I]-- Your quotes: How «significant it is that 84 % of climate scientists have reached a «consensus» that «human - induced warming is occurring» «--RCB- 84 % «personally believe» [implies they may NOT have actually studied this topic — IE: may NOT be experts on this particular matter] human - induced warming is occurring -LCB--... — «In 1991 only 41 % of climate scientists were very confident that industrial emissions of greenhouse gases were responsible for climate disru
global aver temps have increased» during the past century [So do I]-- Your quotes: How «significant it is that 84 % of climate scientists have reached a «consensus» that «human - induced warming is occurring» «--RCB- 84 % «personally believe» [implies they may NOT have actually studied this topic — IE: may NOT be experts on this particular matter] human - induced warming is occurring -LCB--... — «In 1991 only 41 % of climate scientists were very confident that industrial emissions of greenhouse gases were responsible for climate
disruption.
WITHOUT a shadow of a doubt, the greatest scientific hoax ever perpetrated against mankind is that human's modern life (including your sandwich) is
causing catastrophic «climate change» or «
global warming» or «climate
disruption» or «climate breakdown», depending on the day and the activist concerned.
Global Warming / Climate Change / Climate
Disruption / Carbon Pollution could easily be mistaken as a Hoax, given the constant name changing and how it is portrait as
causing everything from shrinking penises to the potential extinction of coffee trees
Ironically, the food industry is at serious risk from
global warming
caused by these greenhouse gases, through the
disruption of the predictable climactic cycles on which agriculture depends.
Conversely, destruction of forests leads to
disruption of the hydrological cycle, which expectedly
causes significant fluctuations of the magnitude of the
global greenhouse effect, up to complete loss of climate stability and transition of Earth's climate to a state incompatible with life.
If you define «
global climate
disruption» as being fewer and less severe hurricanes, fewer and less severe tornadoes, fewer and less severe instances of drought, wildfires, etc., well then I guess I would agree that
global warming is
causing tremendous [laughs] «
global climate
disruption.»
The scientific consensus is that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human agricultural and industrial activity are the principal
cause of this
global warming [1]--[3] and that such emissions must be severely curtailed to prevent further anthropogenic
disruption of the climate system [4].
Huawei, through its
global value brand, Honor, is
causing significant
disruption already, because it is able to manufacture and sell quality carrier - unlocked handsets for as low as $ 200.