Sentences with phrase «caused heated debates»

As is well known, such terms as FET have caused heated debates among investment lawyers and investors might doubt whether domestic fora are capable of properly understanding how these terms should be interpreted.

This has caused some heated debates on the inter-web, with fans claiming Thanos never used the Soul Stone except when performing his devastating snap of the fingers.

Questions about whether pet food should contain gluten and whether is it causing more harm then good have caused heated debates amongst the pet owning public!

Surprising results of a new study will cause heated debate on drinking alcohol during pregnancy.

The move is likely to cause heated debate over who actually owns 31st DWM since former First Lady, Nana Konadu Agyeman Rawlings, is believed to be the founder and President of the movement at all material times.

But it turns out that our reader was asking a good question, one that still causes heated debate among top investing gurus.

Not exact matches

Those disagreements may cause friction and some heated debates from time to time, but they won't destroy your relationship if you don't let them.

No one can cause a more heated debate among parents than the mere mention of homeschooling.

The Lords voted by 306 to 178 against the reforms after a heated debate in which opponents on all sides of the House pointed out the new system could be used to stop any behaviour «capable of causing nuisance or annoyance to any person».

``... as debate regarding abandoned and feral cats has become more heated, concerns have emerged regarding the extent to which some activists will go to promote their cause.

There is still debate over what kind of ocean circulation change causes the change in heat transport.

It is still a matter of debate whether climate change will increase the number of hurricanes, but it is more and more clear that human - caused heating of the planet will boost their severity.

Most experts in the Kilimanjaro debate accept three things: for more than a century, its ice has been in a retreat that is almost assuredly unstoppable and was not caused by humans; so far, there is scant data on conditions there; and the main scientific question now is how, and how much, climate shifts driven by heat - trapping emissions are accelerating that trend.

It's very clear (thanks to Steve M, Willis etc) that there are issues with both but given the current hyped claim by the «warmers» that the past effects of man - caused global warming have largely been masked by the warming of the oceans and that unless we reduce CO2 emissions now that we won't be able to mitigate future global warming when this «stored heat» eventually comes back out of the oceans and leads to catastrophic effects, I'm very interested in getting to the punchline of this debate on SSTs.

If the public saw scientists from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) engaged in heated debate with skeptic climate scientists, it would be deadly to the notion of catastrophic man - caused global warming.

That has to be the crux of the AGW debate, because people like Mielser can procrastinate about penguins, polar bears and heat devouring oceans (how AGW, which is an atmospheric phenomenon, can keep the air at the same temperature but cause the seas to warm is beyond comprehension!)

However, as Mr. Outing points out, presenting a «balanced» view of global heating doesn't make sense — there isn't anything resembling a serious debate about whether human beings are causing global heating because the current scientific consensus is that human burning of fossil fuels is causing global heating.

In the midst of heated debates over human - caused global warming, intelligent, knowledgeable people are now presenting evidence that global cooling is currently under way.

And nobody could figure out which law he broke and this caused yet another heated debate.

There has been a heated debate about the harm caused by bitcoin mining with regard to high power consumption.

He said that it was never intended to cause strife, heated debate, or any other sort of negative repercussions.